C@LAg said:
D&D Off Star Wars. Trilogy dead.
https://deadline.com/2019/10/star-wars-setback-game-of-thrones-duo-david-benioff-d-b-weiss-exit-trilogy-1202771184/
WTF
C@LAg said:
D&D Off Star Wars. Trilogy dead.
https://deadline.com/2019/10/star-wars-setback-game-of-thrones-duo-david-benioff-d-b-weiss-exit-trilogy-1202771184/
Brian Earl Spilner said:
Ironic considering it's also the most controversial entry in the franchise.
If by "large room full of idiot writers" you mean a large room full of writers that outlined A New Hope on one side of the white board then mirrored it on the other, totally agree.redline248 said:
The reason it didn't have massive reshoots is BECAUSE it had a large room full of idiot writers that all loved what they came up with and no one to say "No, that's ****ing stupid!"
Urban Ag said:If by "large room full of idiot writers" you mean a large room full of writers that outlined A New Hope on one side of the white board then mirrored it on the other, totally agree.redline248 said:
The reason it didn't have massive reshoots is BECAUSE it had a large room full of idiot writers that all loved what they came up with and no one to say "No, that's ****ing stupid!"
How so?redline248 said:
It's hard to fathom how much Disney has ****ed up the most iconic property in film history, yet here we are.
Flip these.Quote:
one good film (Solo), one mediocre (TFA)
This is the biggest shortcoming of all, because it's the one that can't really be undone or rehabilitated. There was a divergence that occurred between 7 and 8 which took things in a permanently different direction than they could have gone. Maybe they'll be able to make something good out of 9 which will partially redeem the trilogy, but the lack of an overarching plan for the trilogy was the thing which kept if from being what it should have been.Quote:
And the fact the core trilogy had no guiding narrative from the start has been dumbfounding since Riann indicated he wanted to subvert everything and abandoned JJ's outline.
I'm willing to do that. Matter of opinion.Brian Earl Spilner said:Flip these.Quote:
one good film (Solo), one mediocre (TFA)
Understandable. Who wouldn't have at least a semi coherent outline for a three part multi-billion dollar undertaking?Belton Ag said:
I'd have to go back and find the post, but somewhere in this thread or on the Force Awakens thread I remember confidently stating how Lucasfilm has hammered out a basic story arc for the new trilogy and had fleshed out the characters, etc.
Boy was I wrong.
GiveEmHellBill said:How so?redline248 said:
It's hard to fathom how much Disney has ****ed up the most iconic property in film history, yet here we are.
Serious question. Not being confrontational...I haven't kept up on everything, so I don't know.
Wouldn't most of the chaos with the property all fall back on Kennedy?
I mean, we've gotten good things and bad things since Disney took over. Rogue One is maybe my favorite SW movie now while the Last Jedi is dogsh*t.
The Mandalorian looks like it could be great, but maybe that's because Favreau comes from that Disney system and knows how to work with them.
Is Disney really that bad for the franchise?
Let me be clear... I don't think I could do a better job. I'm simply saying I would do the job and have a hell of a lot of fun in the process.veryfuller said:
Right, I mean...sure all the fans think they could do a better job, so of course they want it. I meant quality, experienced producers who get that Lucasfilm has a fine line for success: getting new fans while appeasing the old ones. It seems like it would be a slam dunk, but after 4 films, its clear that those objectives may be opposed to each other.
redline248 said:GiveEmHellBill said:How so?redline248 said:
It's hard to fathom how much Disney has ****ed up the most iconic property in film history, yet here we are.
Serious question. Not being confrontational...I haven't kept up on everything, so I don't know.
Wouldn't most of the chaos with the property all fall back on Kennedy?
I mean, we've gotten good things and bad things since Disney took over. Rogue One is maybe my favorite SW movie now while the Last Jedi is dogsh*t.
The Mandalorian looks like it could be great, but maybe that's because Favreau comes from that Disney system and knows how to work with them.
Is Disney really that bad for the franchise?
My most simple answer is that I base things on the Saga films, and those have been a mess. It's no surprise the best of the new movies is the one that is a direct lead in to A New Hope. That movie literally had the major plot point developed for it and all they had to do was get from point A to B. And it still took 2 tries to get it.
The fact that the main saga has been cobbled together with no clear plan is a big screw up.
Rebels was awesome, I never watched resistance, and I'm really excited about the Mandalorian. But apparently Disney/Kennedy has stayed out of the way of those.
Maybe you're right that I should put the blame on Kennedy more than Disney, but they've kept her around during all the chaos and controversy.
Sounds like George during the prequelsredline248 said:
The reason it didn't have massive reshoots is BECAUSE it had a large room full of idiot writers that all loved what they came up with and no one to say "No, that's ****ing stupid!"