How about we move on and not attempt to argue fruitlessly on an anonymous message board over something that, in all likelihood, as very little impact on our lives as a whole? I have one opinion, you have another. Let's just leave it at that.
I think the overall point is that the social media world is a toxic cesspool and that Hollywood types are knee deep in the cesspool and help stoke it all - and they do, there are too many examples to count but you can start with Joss Whedon - and that the bottom line is that NONE of it is any good. There is a difference between Whedon wishing Trump to die or Paul Ryan to be raped by a Rhinoceros and what happened to Tran, yes, but it's all a part of the same scummy world. Ignoring Whedon's garbage and allowing it to continue in deference to Tran isn't going to help the problem.fig96 said:Not even remotely what I said or even implied, but whatever. You make it really easy to ignore your opinion when you post comments like this.AgMarauder04 said:fig96 said:Dude, give me a break.AgMarauder04 said:
Enough people from that world take to Twitter to tell us how to think and act. Like it or not, that's a fact. Tran was a pretty awful part of TLJ, bit what happened to her is wrong, but there is a role Hollywood played in the degeneration of civility. Not as much as Washington, but still.
Someone on Twitter "told you" how to act? So ignore them. Don't read what they said. Not hard.
Now go ignore thousands of people attacking you personally on every social media channel. Not even kind of the same thing.
You're right Hollywood is the victim. They are all wonderful people who are what we should all aspire to be like. How could I dare question their magnificence?
Please forgive my ignorance.
If you don't want to discuss a topic, don't respond to it.AgMarauder04 said:
How about we move on and not attempt to argue fruitlessly on an anonymous message board over something that, in all likelihood, as very little impact on our lives as a whole? I have one opinion, you have another. Let's just leave it at that.
I hadn't seen those specific comments from Whedon but I'd agree that's over the top and uncalled for.Belton Ag said:I think the overall point is that the social media world is a toxic cesspool and that Hollywood types are knee deep in the cesspool and help stoke it all - and they do, there are too many examples to count but you can start with Joss Whedon - and that the bottom line is that NONE of it is any good. There is a difference between Whedon wishing Trump to die or Paul Ryan to be raped by a Rhinoceros to what happened to Tran, yes, but it's all a part of the same scummy world. Ignoring Whedon's garbage and allowing it to continue in deference to Tran isn't going to help the problem.fig96 said:Not even remotely what I said or even implied, but whatever. You make it really easy to ignore your opinion when you post comments like this.AgMarauder04 said:fig96 said:Dude, give me a break.AgMarauder04 said:
Enough people from that world take to Twitter to tell us how to think and act. Like it or not, that's a fact. Tran was a pretty awful part of TLJ, bit what happened to her is wrong, but there is a role Hollywood played in the degeneration of civility. Not as much as Washington, but still.
Someone on Twitter "told you" how to act? So ignore them. Don't read what they said. Not hard.
Now go ignore thousands of people attacking you personally on every social media channel. Not even kind of the same thing.
You're right Hollywood is the victim. They are all wonderful people who are what we should all aspire to be like. How could I dare question their magnificence?
Please forgive my ignorance.
Belton Ag said:
yes, but it's all a part of the same scummy world. Ignoring Whedon's garbage and allowing it to continue in deference to Tran isn't going to help the problem.
See! There really is a valuable lesson to take from TLJ!CJS4715 said:Belton Ag said:
yes, but it's all a part of the same scummy world. Ignoring Whedon's garbage and allowing it to continue in deference to Tran isn't going to help the problem.
Good guys, bad guys, made-up words.
AgMarauder04 said:
Although I am SUPER disappointed she's back for IX
dromo07 said:
so does Thrawn make an appearance in TCW? At one point i think i remember a conversation about him knowing or meeting Anakin.
AgMarauder04 said:
The clip was good and the discussion warranted. I take some ownership for poor word choice in attempting to express that both sides have fault in the current climate.
But that horse is dead. Definitely time to move on.
Maybe JJ will take us to Tatooine and she'll fall into the pit of the SarlaccQuote:
Although I am SUPER disappointed she's back for IX
CJS4715 said:
TCW news was pretty big, but again, Disney is playing it pretty safe returning to a familiar era. I am curious which show or movie will break the mold into an unfamiliar era.
A early, hilarious death would make me damn day.Cinco Ranch Aggie said:Maybe JJ will take us to Tatooine and she'll fall into the pit of the SarlaccQuote:
Although I am SUPER disappointed she's back for IX
It's a shame, because a "birth of the First Order" during the Republic would be kinda awesome.Pro Ag said:CJS4715 said:
TCW news was pretty big, but again, Disney is playing it pretty safe returning to a familiar era. I am curious which show or movie will break the mold into an unfamiliar era.
I don'the have any idea how it works with the authors, maybe they have been told not to work beyond the scope of episode 9 which could be limiting them. I am hopeful we can get something different once episode 9 is out.
AgMarauder04 said:A early, hilarious death would make me damn day.Cinco Ranch Aggie said:Maybe JJ will take us to Tatooine and she'll fall into the pit of the SarlaccQuote:
Although I am SUPER disappointed she's back for IX
AgMarauder04 said:It's a shame, because a "birth of the First Order" during the Republic would be kinda awesome.Pro Ag said:CJS4715 said:
TCW news was pretty big, but again, Disney is playing it pretty safe returning to a familiar era. I am curious which show or movie will break the mold into an unfamiliar era.
I don'the have any idea how it works with the authors, maybe they have been told not to work beyond the scope of episode 9 which could be limiting them. I am hopeful we can get something different once episode 9 is out.
Urban Ag said:
Agreed. But in all fairness, Hollywood is getting a dose of what conservatives have been getting for decades. This is what Ag Marauder and CJS4715 are trying to point out. I think.
For example, I am opposed to illegal immigration. A massive swath of this country will call me a xenophobic, racist, backwards, redneck, because of this. In my world I am like, hold on, wait a moment, I have legitimate reasons I would be happy to discuss and debate, but you've just labeled me Hitler. And for crying out loud I am married to a Latina that grew up on the border. It hurts. It sucks. It makes you feel like complete sh** when people who don't know you, don't know a damn thing about what lies in your heart, completely eviscerate you.
That's the whole drag with this hyper sensitive BS culture this country is embracing. Roseanne should not have been fired, IMO. Gunn should not have been fired, IMO. Personally attacking that chick that played Rose in TLJ, or Boyega, or for the love of Christ, the absolutely demented level of hate thrown at George Lucas, Rian Johnson, etc, it's just simply unacceptable in what should be a polite society.
Everyone needs to chill the F out. Seriously.
let's just agree to disagree because at this point I can't even follow WTF you're even talking aboutfig96 said:See, I can't see how you can even look at those things and call them in any way similar. And I say that as someone who's pretty politicly moderate and was very conservative for a long time.Urban Ag said:Agreed. But in all fairness, Hollywood is getting a dose of what conservatives have been getting for decades. This is what Ag Marauder and CJS4715 are trying to point out. I think.fig96 said:Sorry, but that sounds like one big defense of often indefensible actions. And the big difference is that you don't have to listen to Hollywood.CJS4715 said:
I agree with most of that, but I do want to make one deviation, Hollywood is a target, because they have used the pulpit for years to lecture others. Now, the tables have turned and the masses have a medium that allows them to attack back, and it is making people uncomfortable.
You don't like what they're saying, feel they're "lecturing" (which IMO is pretty rare but to each their own), or whatever, then you're totally entitled to that. Don't buy the product/watch the show/play the game. Problem solved.
The way people are using the medium isn't making people "uncomfortable", it's making them often feel targeted, abused, unsafe, and worse. There's a massive difference between discussing or making your opinion known and making people who created something the targets of abuse.
For example, I am opposed to illegal immigration. A massive swath of this country will call me a xenophobic, racist, backwards, redneck, because of this. In my world I am like, hold on, wait a moment, I have legitimate reasons I would be happy to discuss and debate, but you've just labeled me Hitler. And for crying out loud I am married to a Latina that grew up on the border. It hurts. It sucks. It makes you feel like complete sh** when people who don't know you, don't know a damn thing about what lies in your heart, completely eviscerate you.
That's the whole drag with this hyper sensitive BS culture this country is embracing. Roseanne should not have been fired, IMO. Gunn should not have been fired, IMO. Personally attacking that chick that played Rose in TLJ, or Boyega, or for the love of Christ, the absolutely demented level of hate thrown at George Lucas, Rian Johnson, etc, it's just simply unacceptable in what should be a polite society.
Everyone needs to chill the F out. Seriously.
Yes, Hollywood typically leans liberal and has for a while for a number of reasons, and you see that more prominently in some aspects than others (talk shows and sketch comedy in particular). But are you really saying that people viciously attacking individuals via Twitter and other social media, launching campaigns to tank films because they don't like the direction (or even an executive) a studio has chosen, etc., is even remotely equivalent to that?
Our current political climate is garbage and doesn't actually encourage any discussion on issues where people are probably closer in opinion than not if they actually examined things, but that's a separate issue all together.
TCTTS said:AgMarauder04 said:It's a shame, because a "birth of the First Order" during the Republic would be kinda awesome.Pro Ag said:CJS4715 said:
TCW news was pretty big, but again, Disney is playing it pretty safe returning to a familiar era. I am curious which show or movie will break the mold into an unfamiliar era.
I don'the have any idea how it works with the authors, maybe they have been told not to work beyond the scope of episode 9 which could be limiting them. I am hopeful we can get something different once episode 9 is out.
I've said this before, but the birth of the First Order should have been The Force Awakens full stop. Or, rather, we should have seen them reveal themselves and should have been surprised with the Republic at their existence. We still could have had Rey, Finn, Luke, etc in their same, basic arcs, but it was a huge missed opportunity to have the First Order at least start out in the shadows and not be an already known quantity. It honestly wouldn't have taken that much reworking. Then, post-movie, Lucasfilm could have released at comic or novel detailing exactly how they came to be.
AliasMan02 said:
There is an Imperial remnant in the new canon, operating on Coruscant under NR supervision.
Just a tidbit.
Dekker_Lentz said:AliasMan02 said:
There is an Imperial remnant in the new canon, operating on Coruscant under NR supervision.
Just a tidbit.
I think because I haven't read the new canon books and comics, but is there a short summary of what exactly the New Republic is doing in TFA and TLJ?
The First Order blew up a planet that was not Coruscant and that effective ended killed the New Republic's leadership?
And is there an Imperial remnant that formed the First Order and an Imperial remnant that was on Coruscant? Did they coordinate? What if anything were they during the turmoil of the events of TFA and TLJ?
I think this may may be the most confusing item to me as a fan of the old EU, what is the deal with the New Republic and the Old Empire.
I am not interested in arguing if the story ideas are good or not, but just want to know what is going on from another fan's perspective.
Thank you.