Saban has 0 of those awards. So Patterson>Saban.
Is South Platte a woman?
Is South Platte a woman?
WE GET IT, GARY. YOU'RE PROUD OF YOUR ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND DON'T WANT ANY STOOPID AGGGYS TALKING DOWN ABOUT IT. GOOD LUCK AGAINST OHIO STATE.Quote:
Did you consider how many AFCA National Coach of the Year awards both have won? Patterson has 2 and is one of only five coaches in the last 60 years with multiple COY awards, which is given by his peers. There are a number of one hit wonders on that list. To get it twice is a really big deal. Bear, Paterno, Royal, Patterson and McKay. That's good company. Jimbo currently has 0.
Yes, of course I count GP's time pre-Big XII. He has won 11 games in 9 of 18 years. Before you bash GP's time as a group of 5 head coach, remember that Jimbo accepted the HC position at UAB before it was vetoed. Fortune smiled on him and he has had an excellent run as OC and HC at FSU.
These posts will obviously age . . . we will revisit in 5 years!
Huh? Give me a break.AgGrad99 said:
Doesnt matter what you think of A&M coaches, or any other coach. Doesnt matter if you think Patterson is great.
Fact remains that Patterson was actively ducking tough competition, because he was scared playing a real OOC team would prevent him from winning an MNC. He's never sniffed one anyway, so in hindsight, it didnt really matter...but it does show what chicken little's they are.
I'm telling you...he/she is worse. They're a Politics board poster.Ronnie Mund said:
Saban has 0 of those awards. So Patterson>Saban.
Is South Platte a woman?
Have no idea about South Platte but what do you have against women who love college football?Ronnie Mund said:
Saban has 0 of those awards. So Patterson>Saban.
Is South Platte a woman?
Flexbone said:Quote:
51-27
Same as Sumlin's record...in the SEC West.
And that's exactly why Patterson won't ever leave TCU. They wouldn't fire him with that record.Quote:
Since 2012 (the year TCU came to the Big 12 and A&M started playing in the SEC) Patterson and Sumlin both have 51 wins.
And Patterson has one more loss (27) than Sumlin (26).
I'd have lost money betting blind on that.
aggiehawg said:And that's exactly why Patterson won't ever leave TCU. They wouldn't fire him with that record.Quote:
Since 2012 (the year TCU came to the Big 12 and A&M started playing in the SEC) Patterson and Sumlin both have 51 wins.
And Patterson has one more loss (27) than Sumlin (26).
I'd have lost money betting blind on that.
GAC06 said:aggiehawg said:And that's exactly why Patterson won't ever leave TCU. They wouldn't fire him with that record.Quote:
Since 2012 (the year TCU came to the Big 12 and A&M started playing in the SEC) Patterson and Sumlin both have 51 wins.
And Patterson has one more loss (27) than Sumlin (26).
I'd have lost money betting blind on that.
Exactly. Even with the current state of the Big12, TCU is perfectly willing to take a few mediocre or even losing seasons as long as he has up years. That record would have gotten him fired here after a few years, even if he was able to get the same outcome in the much tougher conference.
I'm confused. Aren't you the big Baylor/Briles defender? Apologies in advance if I have mistaken you for another poster.Macarthur said:GAC06 said:aggiehawg said:And that's exactly why Patterson won't ever leave TCU. They wouldn't fire him with that record.Quote:
Since 2012 (the year TCU came to the Big 12 and A&M started playing in the SEC) Patterson and Sumlin both have 51 wins.
And Patterson has one more loss (27) than Sumlin (26).
I'd have lost money betting blind on that.
Exactly. Even with the current state of the Big12, TCU is perfectly willing to take a few mediocre or even losing seasons as long as he has up years. That record would have gotten him fired here after a few years, even if he was able to get the same outcome in the much tougher conference.
Disagree. Let's not forget there is a conf championship in there and several big bowl wins. Sumlinbiant anywhere close to the coach Patterson is.
The WL record for Patterson is a bit deceiving as he had two seasons when he had awful QB meltdown situations. To try and draw an equivalency to sumlin being as good as Patterson based on record is every bit as dumb as you are bashing platte for the fisher comments.
My apologies, again. I stand corrected.Macarthur said:
No. Can't stand Baylor. I have family that are frogs so I've spent a decent amount of time there.
H_Aggie said:
MacArthur is not only stupid but also a lib .
H_Aggie said:
MacArthur is not only stupid but also a lib .
HTownAg98 said:
When Baylol decided to get all rapey.
Quote:
Huh? Give me a break.
Quote:
He specifically asked to get out of that matchup.
Quote:
When Del Conte approached Patterson about the series, the coach said, "So you don't want me to win a national championship?"
As a school that was then set to join the Big East, he also needed four non-conference games per year; a home-and-home with Ohio State fit.
Patterson agreed to it because, as a member of a non Power 5 conference, he knew a win, or even a close finish, could help his team more than his conference schedule that would include Syracuse, Pitt, etc.
No. No it couldnt have.Quote:
As I said in an earlier post, that quote of his could have been meant any number of ways given context.
This is the whole point. He schedules games he can win against mediocre teams, and doesnt want to compete with the big boys.Quote:
Patterson consistently finds middle tier Power 5 teams to play, and TCU wins.
AgGrad99 said:No. No it couldnt have.Quote:
As I said in an earlier post, that quote of his could have been meant any number of ways given context.
Hence the story. From the article:This is the whole point. He schedules games he can win against mediocre teams, and doesnt want to compete with the big boys.Quote:
Patterson consistently finds middle tier Power 5 teams to play, and TCU wins.
Like Herman, Patterson has proven he can compete with the big boys with a lot of time to prepare like in bowl games. If he played Bama, LSU, Auburn etc in one season well that is just a unproven guess.Macarthur said:AgGrad99 said:No. No it couldnt have.Quote:
As I said in an earlier post, that quote of his could have been meant any number of ways given context.
Hence the story. From the article:This is the whole point. He schedules games he can win against mediocre teams, and doesnt want to compete with the big boys.Quote:
Patterson consistently finds middle tier Power 5 teams to play, and TCU wins.
So the LSU game?
You're cherry picking parts of the article and reading into it.
So I guess now that because a reporter writes something like this, we now are supposed to believe it because it's written with a slight slant against a team that I don't care for. I wonder what the reaction would be if it were written about my team?
Right after his quote, it specifically says he agreed that the game was needed.
Patterson has shown his entire career that he can compete w the big boys so that's just a silly position.