I took my FOM call profit and bought more $1 Jan2024 and Feb2024 WWR calls today than was reasonable. It felt so right to do something so wrong.
Yes, the FCF is likely a compounded collection of the cashflow.reineraggie09 said:
Excuse me for my ignorance, but I am here to learn.
How can the project have a NPV of 229M and FCF of 700+m? Is the FCF figure just an addition of all CF amounts without any discounting? I am just trying to understand.
No, JPM collar will roll last trading day of December, and is much larger.Charismatic Megafauna said:
But also$SPX More Bullish Prints đź‘€
— Cheddar Flow (@CheddarFlow) December 13, 2023
These have less premium than the $50M+ orders that we saw 2 days ago pic.twitter.com/Ry3urXZ4cX
Could it be the jpm collar?
Quote:
That while the Fed has been paring back the size of its balance sheet, beneath the surface, central banks have boosted support for markets by allowing bank reserves to expand, increasing the amount of capital available to be deployed into markets and the economy.
Quote:
The fact that the Fed has reduced its bondholdings to $7.8 trillion, from $9 trillion at its peak last year, isn't what investors should be focusing on.
Instead of the Fed's shrinking balance sheet, what really matters is how reserves in the U.S. banking system have increased by $500 billion since January, according to King.
The Fed isn't alone in this. Instead of withdrawing $1 trillion in liquidity after declaring war on inflation in 2022, the world's biggest central banks instead injected roughly an equivalent amount, King's research shows.
Quote:
"The first 10 days of December continued the recent trends of expanding U.S. liquidity, driven by draws from the RRP facility and the Treasury General Account," said a team of cross-asset analysts at Goldman Sachs in a recent report obtained by MarketWatch.
"Together with the lagged-behind effects from the U.S. policy impulse easing in the aftermath of the regional-bank funding pressures earlier in the year, the high liquidity should support risk-asset performance and tight credit spreads into year-end," the Goldman team added.
By Goldman's count, banking reserves expanded by roughly $50 billion on net during the first week of December alone.
Funny how this didn't get mentioned at FOMC. This is a ticking timebomb. The entire rally from March until present is 100% QE driven. It's just not the QE on the surface. It's the ticking timebomb under the hood.Quote:
"There is a reason why QE is so powerful," King said. "QE creates new money in the form of reserves, but not only that, it withdraws bonds and bills from the market, so the private sector then has more money, and fewer places to invest that money."
"When reserves change, that alters the balance between how much money private investors have got, and the amount of securities available to invest in," he said.
"When you give investors less money, and more securities to invest in, then we see prices go down. Reserves were coming down in 2022 when everything was selling off. But this year, that has stopped."
Heineken-Ashi said:
Wall Street has discovered what's really driving U.S. stocks higher in 2023. - MarketWatchQuote:
That while the Fed has been paring back the size of its balance sheet, beneath the surface, central banks have boosted support for markets by allowing bank reserves to expand, increasing the amount of capital available to be deployed into markets and the economy.Quote:
The fact that the Fed has reduced its bondholdings to $7.8 trillion, from $9 trillion at its peak last year, isn't what investors should be focusing on.
Instead of the Fed's shrinking balance sheet, what really matters is how reserves in the U.S. banking system have increased by $500 billion since January, according to King.
The Fed isn't alone in this. Instead of withdrawing $1 trillion in liquidity after declaring war on inflation in 2022, the world's biggest central banks instead injected roughly an equivalent amount, King's research shows.Quote:
"The first 10 days of December continued the recent trends of expanding U.S. liquidity, driven by draws from the RRP facility and the Treasury General Account," said a team of cross-asset analysts at Goldman Sachs in a recent report obtained by MarketWatch.
"Together with the lagged-behind effects from the U.S. policy impulse easing in the aftermath of the regional-bank funding pressures earlier in the year, the high liquidity should support risk-asset performance and tight credit spreads into year-end," the Goldman team added.
By Goldman's count, banking reserves expanded by roughly $50 billion on net during the first week of December alone.Funny how this didn't get mentioned at FOMC. This is a ticking timebomb. The entire rally from March until present is 100% QE driven. It's just not the QE on the surface. It's the ticking timebomb under the hood.Quote:
"There is a reason why QE is so powerful," King said. "QE creates new money in the form of reserves, but not only that, it withdraws bonds and bills from the market, so the private sector then has more money, and fewer places to invest that money."
"When reserves change, that alters the balance between how much money private investors have got, and the amount of securities available to invest in," he said.
"When you give investors less money, and more securities to invest in, then we see prices go down. Reserves were coming down in 2022 when everything was selling off. But this year, that has stopped."
It was purely reacting to the banking scare. Remember, no matter what they say, the FED's one true mandate is to enrich the banking sector and protect them from reaping the mistakes they sow. When a banking crisis shows signs of happening, it will do anything in its power to provide liquidty to support it. In this case, it couldn't provide direct liquidity through QE. So it provided it in an indirect manner. ELI5 terms - The FED put a bandaid on a deep, wide gash.Red Pear Luke (BCS) said:Heineken-Ashi said:
Wall Street has discovered what's really driving U.S. stocks higher in 2023. - MarketWatchQuote:
That while the Fed has been paring back the size of its balance sheet, beneath the surface, central banks have boosted support for markets by allowing bank reserves to expand, increasing the amount of capital available to be deployed into markets and the economy.Quote:
The fact that the Fed has reduced its bondholdings to $7.8 trillion, from $9 trillion at its peak last year, isn't what investors should be focusing on.
Instead of the Fed's shrinking balance sheet, what really matters is how reserves in the U.S. banking system have increased by $500 billion since January, according to King.
The Fed isn't alone in this. Instead of withdrawing $1 trillion in liquidity after declaring war on inflation in 2022, the world's biggest central banks instead injected roughly an equivalent amount, King's research shows.Quote:
"The first 10 days of December continued the recent trends of expanding U.S. liquidity, driven by draws from the RRP facility and the Treasury General Account," said a team of cross-asset analysts at Goldman Sachs in a recent report obtained by MarketWatch.
"Together with the lagged-behind effects from the U.S. policy impulse easing in the aftermath of the regional-bank funding pressures earlier in the year, the high liquidity should support risk-asset performance and tight credit spreads into year-end," the Goldman team added.
By Goldman's count, banking reserves expanded by roughly $50 billion on net during the first week of December alone.Funny how this didn't get mentioned at FOMC. This is a ticking timebomb. The entire rally from March until present is 100% QE driven. It's just not the QE on the surface. It's the ticking timebomb under the hood.Quote:
"There is a reason why QE is so powerful," King said. "QE creates new money in the form of reserves, but not only that, it withdraws bonds and bills from the market, so the private sector then has more money, and fewer places to invest that money."
"When reserves change, that alters the balance between how much money private investors have got, and the amount of securities available to invest in," he said.
"When you give investors less money, and more securities to invest in, then we see prices go down. Reserves were coming down in 2022 when everything was selling off. But this year, that has stopped."
This makes me wonder if it's related to the feds rate cut forecast? Do they know this as well and are prepared to add more QE to the system to try and shore up the gaps and limp this thing along until after the election?
the JPM collar is the last day of the quarter, and is in the billions.Charismatic Megafauna said:
But also$SPX More Bullish Prints đź‘€
— Cheddar Flow (@CheddarFlow) December 13, 2023
These have less premium than the $50M+ orders that we saw 2 days ago pic.twitter.com/Ry3urXZ4cX
Could it be the jpm collar?
cryption said:
I just bought a starter position in $DNA. The just announced a partnership with PFE focused on the discovery of RNA based drug candidates. The 10/20 2c is getting some action - my plan is sell at 2.30 and a stop at 1.57. I'm playing shares.
While I'm not txaggieacct85 to tell you to unload, I am definitely trimming some things back (covered calls that I'm not going to roll).EnronAg said:
VIX 30+ on or near 11/5/24
where is txaggieacct85 to tell us to unload?
Bob Knights Paper Hands said:
Speaking of bull**** small cap stocks, is SAVA going to have a data release in Dec/Jan like I'd hoped?
You are not correct.Heineken-Ashi said:Markets react to what's behind them. They do not predict anything. Markets have been predicting no more rate increases for a year now. Markets predicted rates going down starting end of this year. Markets predicted 2023 at new lows, not almost back to ATH. Though markets might try to forecast future growth, they will pivot on a dime, sometimes on no news and at unpredictable times.aggiebrad94 said:Markets are predicting no more hikes at a 98% probability.EngrAg14 said:
Market should be expecting the 1/4 rate increase that should be announced tomorrow correct?
Haven't seen rumblings of a 1/2 %, and if they hold again then the market booms.
If the market was predictive rates would have dropped in 2023. Right one time and wrong a bunch others is nothing more than blind squirrel material. Markets are not omniscient.aggiebrad94 said:You are not correct.Heineken-Ashi said:Markets react to what's behind them. They do not predict anything. Markets have been predicting no more rate increases for a year now. Markets predicted rates going down starting end of this year. Markets predicted 2023 at new lows, not almost back to ATH. Though markets might try to forecast future growth, they will pivot on a dime, sometimes on no news and at unpredictable times.aggiebrad94 said:Markets are predicting no more hikes at a 98% probability.EngrAg14 said:
Market should be expecting the 1/4 rate increase that should be announced tomorrow correct?
Haven't seen rumblings of a 1/2 %, and if they hold again then the market booms.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonmoore/2023/12/05/markets-see-spring-2024-interest-rate-cuts-but-the-fed-isnt-there-yet/?sh=370b21cc20fc
Bob Knights Paper Hands said:
The sad part is everyone that was paying attention knew this is what was happening. And why wouldn't they, when it is politically beneficial to show a strong economy just before an election, rather than the pile of dog excrement that it is?
So we get a pile of dog excrement covered in a thin layer of frosting. But it's that good buttery frosting that everyone loves so the media can focus on the wonderful frosting we all get to eat and feed to the next generations.
Trade what's in front of you. Move stops up to support levels. This way, you aren't trying to time a top. You might not sell at tops. But you won't get caught with pants down. And if this keeps going, you keep going with it while knowing you have risk management in place.ravingfans said:Bob Knights Paper Hands said:
The sad part is everyone that was paying attention knew this is what was happening. And why wouldn't they, when it is politically beneficial to show a strong economy just before an election, rather than the pile of dog excrement that it is?
So we get a pile of dog excrement covered in a thin layer of frosting. But it's that good buttery frosting that everyone loves so the media can focus on the wonderful frosting we all get to eat and feed to the next generations.
So can we confidently make money on the frosting up until day before the election with this knowledge/belief?
HoustonAg_2009 said:
Look at WAL and TFC keep running with rates…. Where's Prog at??