rounded formation
Failed to claim daily 5ema at $288.08. I won't get bullish till we claim that level.BREwmaster said:
another bearish perspective...
rounded formation
SMRs are just waiting for the first domino to fall in a state willing to take a chance and then trumpet their success to the rest of the country.texagbeliever said:My bet is that SMRs displace wind & solar. At least large scale penetration of wind and solar. They will also displace a fair bit of natural gas and probably the remaining coal plants. I just am not a believer in battery technology. It's been 7 years since they were lauded as the energy game changer. And 7 years later they are nothing more than giant surge protectors.FrioAg 00 said:
As battery technology advances, those unstable but sustainable energy sources like wind and solar become much more viable
Txducker said:I see your take on your chart (2 min?). I am on a 10min. chart and different time frames definitely give different perspectives (especially for drawing trend lines ).irish pete ag06 said:case can be made for an inverse H&S too.Txducker said:
qqq has a possible intraday head and shoulders forming. watch out
10 min intraday trend line is now also broken.
yep and this pattern is even playing out after hours, funny how it worked out...Txducker said:Failed to claim daily 5ema at $288.08. I won't get bullish till we claim that level.BREwmaster said:
another bearish perspective...
rounded formation
JUST IN: Joe Biden has said he would use military force against Iran to stop it from acquiring nuclear weapons.
— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) July 13, 2022
Boom. March 31. Reminder: the only tool the FED has to drop inflation is to kill jobs.Bonfire1996 said:
Regarding 2yr/10yr Treasury rate inversion, I particularly enjoyed the talking heads who downplayed it and said, "It doesn't mean an absolute recession", "it may not happen", or my favorite "it isn't a real inversion since the yield curve is so flat from Covid"
These people. Shake My Damn Head.
Nonetheless, we will shut them up in July - Sept with a true inversion by around 50 basis points. The FED is going up 100 bp over the next two meetings. The 2 year treasury is going to 2.9%.
Everyone says the fed is watching this inflation gauge or that inflation gauge……wrong. Inflation already happened. It's endemic, to borrow a word. It's time to destroy demand. The Fed is going to watch jobless claims. Until jobless claims rise, the Fed is going to make it effing hurt.
Invest accordingly. This is a medium term dead cat bounce through June.
LOL, circle back jr. will be along shortly to tell us all he misspoke.BaylorSpineGuy said:JUST IN: Joe Biden has said he would use military force against Iran to stop it from acquiring nuclear weapons.
— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) July 13, 2022
Just a guess….he went off the teleprompter?
texagbeliever said:My bet is that SMRs displace wind & solar. At least large scale penetration of wind and solar. They will also displace a fair bit of natural gas and probably the remaining coal plants. I just am not a believer in battery technology. It's been 7 years since they were lauded as the energy game changer. And 7 years later they are nothing more than giant surge protectors.FrioAg 00 said:
As battery technology advances, those unstable but sustainable energy sources like wind and solar become much more viable
To date, NuScale (a subsidiary of Fluor) is the only company to receive approval to build test reactors by the DOE. To highlight the insanity of this whole deal, these reactors aren't scheduled until '29 and '30.irish pete ag06 said:texagbeliever said:My bet is that SMRs displace wind & solar. At least large scale penetration of wind and solar. They will also displace a fair bit of natural gas and probably the remaining coal plants. I just am not a believer in battery technology. It's been 7 years since they were lauded as the energy game changer. And 7 years later they are nothing more than giant surge protectors.FrioAg 00 said:
As battery technology advances, those unstable but sustainable energy sources like wind and solar become much more viable
Speaking of SMR, is there a long term stock to buy to bet on nuclear long term?
Bob Knights Liver said:
I really can go either way, but a relatively low p/c ratio, a bounce after bad inflation news, and reclaiming some levels... I don't want to be bullish because there's so many reasons to bear.
$30,000 Millionaire said:
Opex Friday, but I think tomorrow is a really big day for determining if there will be rally continuation. Bears couldn't spike the football today.
I'd probably lean short below 3790, I'd probably lean bullish above 3815. I think the space in between will be chop zone.
Hey @thehoneybee0101 , I was wondering, Do your $SPY trades still look like the ones you've posted in the past or do they finally have the 24 hr symbol on them now like in the example shown on the right ?
— Xiuying (@Xiuying) July 10, 2022
Thanks to @Guruleaks1 for making the post that got me curious about them. pic.twitter.com/kTaEDDNsFT
How it started...How it's going
— GuruLeaks (@Guruleaks1) July 13, 2022
FintwitPaidGuru @MagicMikeTrader aka @MagicTickersLLC
Is CharlatanMike Dead or Alive?
cc: @Trendspider @Jake__Wujastyk pic.twitter.com/D8pM33slKS
FintwitCharlatan @MagicMikeTrader
— GuruLeaks (@Guruleaks1) July 13, 2022
His followers mourned his sudden passing, until they realized he was alive
cc: @FBIKnoxville @TBInvestigation @Trendspider @Juake__Wujastk pic.twitter.com/ZhSjM1vB6J
Yep, go to a casino and put it all on black at the roulette wheel. Although all intelligent people know nuclear is the only way, you'll be parking money that will just be dead money. You've found a successful way that you're growing your account based on your posts, why deviate from success, especially in a maybe? Nuclear involves too much politics and your money would be at more risk than reward imo.irish pete ag06 said:texagbeliever said:My bet is that SMRs displace wind & solar. At least large scale penetration of wind and solar. They will also displace a fair bit of natural gas and probably the remaining coal plants. I just am not a believer in battery technology. It's been 7 years since they were lauded as the energy game changer. And 7 years later they are nothing more than giant surge protectors.FrioAg 00 said:
As battery technology advances, those unstable but sustainable energy sources like wind and solar become much more viable
Speaking of SMR, is there a long term stock to buy to bet on nuclear long term?
This Aggie was my next door neighbor for 3 years. I always thought he would lead America in some way in the nuclear field. Last job I remember him having at Ford was developing their EV's. Guess he got a better gig with Amazon. I remember we had a conversation about 3 Mile Island after he returned as an intern with the nuclear regulatory agency, if I recall correctly. He spent some time there. Ever since that conversation, nuclear & the U.S. just didn't seem like it wanted to come together....and that's been a long time ago.ProgN said:Yep, go to a casino and put it all on black at the roulette wheel. Although all intelligent people know nuclear is the only way, you'll be parking money that will just be dead money. You've found a successful way that you're growing your account based on your posts, why deviate from success, especially in a maybe? Nuclear involves too much politics and your money would be at more risk than reward imo.irish pete ag06 said:texagbeliever said:My bet is that SMRs displace wind & solar. At least large scale penetration of wind and solar. They will also displace a fair bit of natural gas and probably the remaining coal plants. I just am not a believer in battery technology. It's been 7 years since they were lauded as the energy game changer. And 7 years later they are nothing more than giant surge protectors.FrioAg 00 said:
As battery technology advances, those unstable but sustainable energy sources like wind and solar become much more viable
Speaking of SMR, is there a long term stock to buy to bet on nuclear long term?
ProgN said:Yep, go to a casino and put it all on black at the roulette wheel. Although all intelligent people know nuclear is the only way, you'll be parking money that will just be dead money. You've found a successful way that you're growing your account based on your posts, why deviate from success, especially in a maybe? Nuclear involves too much politics and your money would be at more risk than reward imo.irish pete ag06 said:texagbeliever said:My bet is that SMRs displace wind & solar. At least large scale penetration of wind and solar. They will also displace a fair bit of natural gas and probably the remaining coal plants. I just am not a believer in battery technology. It's been 7 years since they were lauded as the energy game changer. And 7 years later they are nothing more than giant surge protectors.FrioAg 00 said:
As battery technology advances, those unstable but sustainable energy sources like wind and solar become much more viable
Speaking of SMR, is there a long term stock to buy to bet on nuclear long term?
Nuclear makes too much sense to be the solution, which is maddening. If the greenies truly want to be green, this is the way to go. The nuclear of tomorrow bears no resemblance to the nuclear of yesterday. Finding the right mix for an individual utility has to involve nuclear if the state regulators won't approve new gas. If you live in a blue state like I do, you can't retire coal fast enough and they have already turned their sights on gas. It's not physically possible to run our state on renewables, even though we are blessed with abundant sunshine and wind.Farmer @ Johnsongrass, TX said:This Aggie was my next door neighbor for 3 years. I always thought he would lead America in some way in the nuclear field. Last job I remember him having at Ford was developing their EV's. Guess he got a better gig with Amazon. I remember we had a conversation about 3 Mile Island after he returned as an intern with the nuclear regulatory agency, if I recall correctly. He spent some time there. Ever since that conversation, nuclear & the U.S. just didn't seem like it wanted to come together....and that's been a long time ago.ProgN said:Yep, go to a casino and put it all on black at the roulette wheel. Although all intelligent people know nuclear is the only way, you'll be parking money that will just be dead money. You've found a successful way that you're growing your account based on your posts, why deviate from success, especially in a maybe? Nuclear involves too much politics and your money would be at more risk than reward imo.irish pete ag06 said:texagbeliever said:My bet is that SMRs displace wind & solar. At least large scale penetration of wind and solar. They will also displace a fair bit of natural gas and probably the remaining coal plants. I just am not a believer in battery technology. It's been 7 years since they were lauded as the energy game changer. And 7 years later they are nothing more than giant surge protectors.FrioAg 00 said:
As battery technology advances, those unstable but sustainable energy sources like wind and solar become much more viable
Speaking of SMR, is there a long term stock to buy to bet on nuclear long term?
https://www.freep.com/story/money/cars/ford/2021/06/24/chief-technology-officer-ken-washington-amazon/5328732001/
We have the people and the technology. The "why not" is the bigger piece of the puzzle.