AMX looks almost too obvious.
Farmer @ Johnsongrass, TX said:
Idaho was a well kept secret until the Californians started moving in a few years ago.
This is a little bit frustrating to read, as there are many in this thread who research technical analysis to study the best possible entries and exits, and take the time to chart and analyze for the benefit of others in the thread. There are others here that provide great fundamental analysis. Regardless, most in this thread are trying to help others add more tools to their toolboxes.Brian Earl Spilner said:Thanks. But fyi, we're all gambling.sts7049 said:you pretended as if your strategy was sound, but nevertheless congrats that your gamble worked so farBrian Earl Spilner said:
Never called a bottom. I wasn't the one who pretended to be in the know and calling everyone else crazy.
And I haven't pretended any of my strategy isn't a risk. In fact I've pointed it out several times. What I said is I'm willing to take the risk to go long at the current levels.
I deployed about half of my cash yesterday as posted in 5 stocks. I'm usually a bit early so not surprised that I didn't pick the bottom. The rest will go in either <SPX 3400 or once it looks like we've bottomed and consolidated higher.BaylorSpineGuy said:
A number of people on here have said that they would deploy half their capital at 3700 and the remainder at either 3500-3200.
Given the relative facility with which we have arrived at 3700 with so much more rate hikes, etc., to come, is anyone changing their tune?
I'm not saying to call a bottom, but this seems like we are in the early stages. Seems like this may persist for a year or more. And a lot of circulating commentary about a lost decade type of environment similar to 1968-82, where S&P/DJIA made no nominal gains over a nearly 15 yr period.
59 South said:
Watch out for a bloody red open just below previous lows and then a red to green day. Common trick to F retail.
The other route is a capitulation flush down to next support around 3500-3600.
Carlo4 said:
Today will be massive. Tomorrow will sell off massively right?
Bob Knights Liver said:59 South said:
Watch out for a bloody red open just below previous lows and then a red to green day. Common trick to F retail.
The other route is a capitulation flush down to next support around 3500-3600.
Spot on, govn'a. When a saw the markets this morning I said to me self I says, "I know Asia is Barney rubble, but if you take a butcher's hook at max pain, it's still north of 4000. It doesn't seem unlikely for us moving back up and trading in that 3750-3800 range again by this afternoon, mate."
GreasenUSA said:
We're all at different points in our trading journeys, but I would bet that many of us have tried the buy long, average down, average down, average down strategy before. It works great, until you blow an account. I did precisely that over a decade ago. Never again.
Maybe it would help others understand better if you outlined your strategy. Just an idea...
GreasenUSA said:This is a little bit frustrating to read, as there are many in this thread who research technical analysis to study the best possible entries and exits, and take the time to chart and analyze for the benefit of others in the thread. There are others here that provide great fundamental analysis. Regardless, most in this thread are trying to help others add more tools to their toolboxes.Brian Earl Spilner said:Thanks. But fyi, we're all gambling.sts7049 said:you pretended as if your strategy was sound, but nevertheless congrats that your gamble worked so farBrian Earl Spilner said:
Never called a bottom. I wasn't the one who pretended to be in the know and calling everyone else crazy.
And I haven't pretended any of my strategy isn't a risk. In fact I've pointed it out several times. What I said is I'm willing to take the risk to go long at the current levels.
They don't view what they do as gambling. There are also some here that earn their living doing this.
We're all at different points in our trading journeys, but I would bet that many of us have tried the buy long, average down, average down, average down strategy before. It works great, until you blow an account. I did precisely that over a decade ago. Never again.
Maybe it would help others understand better if you outlined your strategy. Just an idea...
ProgN said:Bob Knights Liver said:59 South said:
Watch out for a bloody red open just below previous lows and then a red to green day. Common trick to F retail.
The other route is a capitulation flush down to next support around 3500-3600.
Spot on, govn'a. When a saw the markets this morning I said to me self I says, "I know Asia is Barney rubble, but if you take a butcher's hook at max pain, it's still north of 4000. It doesn't seem unlikely for us moving back up and trading in that 3750-3800 range again by this afternoon, mate."
Sorry, but you're wrong. It's totally different than blackjack. As I've stated before, solely using charting is a fool's errand in selecting investments, but even if it is used (instead of more thorough due diligence or just investing in a broad index fund), you can expect much better results than playing blackjack. Some simple numbers:Jet Black said:GreasenUSA said:This is a little bit frustrating to read, as there are many in this thread who research technical analysis to study the best possible entries and exits, and take the time to chart and analyze for the benefit of others in the thread. There are others here that provide great fundamental analysis. Regardless, most in this thread are trying to help others add more tools to their toolboxes.Brian Earl Spilner said:Thanks. But fyi, we're all gambling.sts7049 said:you pretended as if your strategy was sound, but nevertheless congrats that your gamble worked so farBrian Earl Spilner said:
Never called a bottom. I wasn't the one who pretended to be in the know and calling everyone else crazy.
And I haven't pretended any of my strategy isn't a risk. In fact I've pointed it out several times. What I said is I'm willing to take the risk to go long at the current levels.
They don't view what they do as gambling. There are also some here that earn their living doing this.
We're all at different points in our trading journeys, but I would bet that many of us have tried the buy long, average down, average down, average down strategy before. It works great, until you blow an account. I did precisely that over a decade ago. Never again.
Maybe it would help others understand better if you outlined your strategy. Just an idea...
It's no different than having a system for black Jack, imo. You maybe able to take some of the risk out but it's still a roll of the dice every time you make a trade.
Unless I'm unaware of how successful people can be playing blackjack in a casino, I just don't see it this way. I do understand this mindset from someone who is new to trading, but if you take time (usually years) to learn technical analysis, screen time with charting, the ebb and flow of the market, and when to sit on your hands, you can be successful as a trader. The final keys being risk management and your emotions.Jet Black said:
It's no different than having a system for black Jack, imo. You maybe able to take some of the risk out but it's still a roll of the dice every time you make a trade.