Mac is outraged!Farmer1906 said:
Chase Utley - 45.0% (this feels disrespectful)
Mac is outraged!Farmer1906 said:
Chase Utley - 45.0% (this feels disrespectful)
Quote:
Could it be Billy Wagner's year?
This year's Hall of Fame ballot has a pretty high number of divisive candidates. OK, let's be real: It's the Hall of Fame voting process; there are always divisive candidates. For me, Billy Wagner, now in his ninth year on the ballot, has been a conundrum for the better part of a decade.
First, the numbers. As Tyler Kepner points out in this profile, Wagner's 2.31 ERA is lower than every reliever in Cooperstown not named Mariano Rivera. But his 903 innings would be fewer than any of them.
The thing is, Wagner could have stuck around and padded those numbers. His final year 2010 with Atlanta saw him make his seventh All-Star game, and his 1.43 ERA in 71 games was the best of his career, not counting 1995 (when he faced and retired one batter). But as Wagner told Kepner, he was ready to go home and be with his family.
So is he a Hall of Famer? It didn't look like it when he hit the ballot for the first time in 2016 and he earned just 10.5 percent of the vote. Some of that might have been that the 10-player limit meant voters had to clear a backlog of other players first. But at time of writing, he's sitting at 79 percent on Ryan Thibodaux's vote tracker, with 152 ballots (42.2 percent of the expected total) accounted for. If he can manage 72.1 percent on the remaining ballots, he's in.
I think he should be in. He was the platonic ideal of the modern closer decades before it became the norm. From 1996 to 2010, only one pitcher had a higher K/9 than Wagner's 11.92 (min.100 innings) that would be Brad Lidge (12.00), who pitched 574 2/3 innings, more than 300 fewer than Wagner. His 82 percent strand rate on base runners is better than all but seven guys, none of whom pitched more than 255 innings.
He's not a first-ballot guy, but I think if he's a ninth-ballot guy, the voters will have made the right decision.
Yes, but it comes with slow, non-exceptional Coors Field specials like Helton getting 83+% of the vote. What a joke.ChipFTAC01 said:
One positive in the last few years at least the no question HOFers are basically getting in with 98% of the vote. None of this Joe Dimaggio and Mickey Mantle getting 88% of the vote.
From a small town to the biggest stage, Billy Wagner's baseball story is one of determination and dominance.
— MLB Network (@MLBNetwork) January 23, 2024
🎙️ Craig Biggio
🖊️ @jonmorosi pic.twitter.com/DKf71Wieiy
The Porkchop Express said:
Is anyone else confused that Adrian Beltre who failed to hit 500 home runs and batted .286 for his career with 0 MVP wins is getting 99% of the vote?
Very strangeW said:
the problem with Beltre's candidacy...
there were numerous times during his career...I forgot he was still in the league
had a very non-spectacular career
(and yes, got a free pass for the 2004 HR outburst)
The Porkchop Express said:
Is anyone else confused that Adrian Beltre who failed to hit 500 home runs and batted .286 for his career with 0 MVP wins is getting 99% of the vote?
He won 2 MVPsAgRyan04 said:The Porkchop Express said:
Is anyone else confused that Adrian Beltre who failed to hit 500 home runs and batted .286 for his career with 0 MVP wins is getting 99% of the vote?
Dale Murphy sure is
But the 3,000 hits is essentially and auto-qualifier
The Porkchop Express said:
Phil Rizzuto.
He was the shortstop and one of the most popular players of the greatest dynasty of the Game's history. His offensive production was likely far better than most shortstops of his era and losing three full season to WWII is an easy way to dismiss his less than stellar counting numbers. It certainly didn't hurt that he was a very popular announcer and media personality for 40+ seasons.Quote:
Phil Rizzuto.