Forgive me if it was already brought up, but has anyone looked to see if it's true that there's never been a WS rematch in back-to-back years?
Which is insane. WS Springer levelBregxit said:redline248 said:
Schwarber is up to 20 career postseason homers? Did teams forget that he likes to strike out?
A fourth of those he has hit in this NLCS.
DustysLineup said:
Forgive me if it was already brought up, but has anyone looked to see if it's true that there's never been a WS rematch in back-to-back years?
stoneca said:
Does anyone know if Abreu has officially appealed yet?
If (big IF) he's suspended then no he can't be replaced.BCSGrubber said:
So if Abreu is suspended do we get to add a pitcher? If so I wonder if Graveman is ready,
how can he appeal at 7pm when the game starts at 7pm? So he will appeal right as the game starts and then will be able to play? TIAamercer said:stoneca said:
Does anyone know if Abreu has officially appealed yet?
Has to wait until 7pm tomorrow so the 48 hour clock let's him play 6/7 if needed
They have to actually hear his appeal before they can rule. It isn't as simple as he says "I appeal" and they say "Denied". He gets to plead his case why he thinks the suspension is unwarranted. Would be a shame if there was no easy time to schedule them to hear it until after game 7 (if necessary).Ags #1 said:
When he appeals that starts the 48 hr clock, whose to say mlb doesnt already have their ruling ready? They dont have to wait the full 48 do they?
txags92 said:They have to actually hear his appeal before they can rule. It isn't as simple as he says "I appeal" and they say "Denied". He gets to plead his case why he thinks the suspension is unwarranted. Would be a shame if there was no easy time to schedule them to hear it until after game 7 (if necessary).Ags #1 said:
When he appeals that starts the 48 hr clock, whose to say mlb doesnt already have their ruling ready? They dont have to wait the full 48 do they?
There was a time when the appeal had to be heard in NYC at MLB Headquarters. So yes the next time you were in NYC was a common time.Willy Wonka said:txags92 said:They have to actually hear his appeal before they can rule. It isn't as simple as he says "I appeal" and they say "Denied". He gets to plead his case why he thinks the suspension is unwarranted. Would be a shame if there was no easy time to schedule them to hear it until after game 7 (if necessary).Ags #1 said:
When he appeals that starts the 48 hr clock, whose to say mlb doesnt already have their ruling ready? They dont have to wait the full 48 do they?
I seem to remember that appeals used to be heard the next time your team was in or near New York City.
Not sure if the 48 hour rule for the post season means they will do appeals via teleconference, but it would certainly be a considerable imposition to make him travel to NY and back between games 6 & 7.Mathguy64 said:There was a time when the appeal had to be heard in NYC at MLB Headquarters. So yes the next time you were in NYC was a common time.Willy Wonka said:txags92 said:They have to actually hear his appeal before they can rule. It isn't as simple as he says "I appeal" and they say "Denied". He gets to plead his case why he thinks the suspension is unwarranted. Would be a shame if there was no easy time to schedule them to hear it until after game 7 (if necessary).Ags #1 said:
When he appeals that starts the 48 hr clock, whose to say mlb doesnt already have their ruling ready? They dont have to wait the full 48 do they?
I seem to remember that appeals used to be heard the next time your team was in or near New York City.
jkag89 said:
There have been numerous back to back rematches in World Series history. with most being Effin' Dodgers vs Damn Yankees.
1907-08 - Chicago vs Detroit (Cubs won both)
1921-23 - NY Giants vs Damn Yankees (Giants won 2 of 3)
1930-31 - Philadelphia A's vs St. Louis Cardinals (Split)
1936-37 - NY Giants vs Damn Yankees (NYY won both)
1942-43 - Damn Yankees vs St. Louis Cardinals (Split)
1952-53 - Effin' Dodgers vs Damn Yankees (NYY won both)
1955-56 - Effin' Dodgers vs Damn Yankees (Split)
1957-58 - Milwaukee Braves vs Damn Yankees (Split)
1977-78 - Effin' Dodgers vs Damn Yankees (NYY won both)
I think I didn't miss any.
The legend continues...#Ready2Reign pic.twitter.com/dSHcYIt2rd
— Houston Astros (@astros) October 21, 2023
Mathguy64 said:There was a time when the appeal had to be heard in NYC at MLB Headquarters. So yes the next time you were in NYC was a common time.Willy Wonka said:txags92 said:They have to actually hear his appeal before they can rule. It isn't as simple as he says "I appeal" and they say "Denied". He gets to plead his case why he thinks the suspension is unwarranted. Would be a shame if there was no easy time to schedule them to hear it until after game 7 (if necessary).Ags #1 said:
When he appeals that starts the 48 hr clock, whose to say mlb doesnt already have their ruling ready? They dont have to wait the full 48 do they?
I seem to remember that appeals used to be heard the next time your team was in or near New York City.
jkag89 said:
Very meh game tonight.
Hoping for just as meh of a game with the 'Stros closing it out tomorrow.
Big Puma was a wrecking machine in the playoffs, he'd be a good addition. Beltran was unreal with 8 HRs in 8 games in his rental year with us, and he was a better CF than we have now. Prime Bagwell (pre-shoulder injuries) would be insane at MMP.tjack16 said:If you could add any former Astro to this current lineup to help win a WS who would it be? I’ll start: Nolan Ryan
— 2x World Champs 🏆🏆 (@AlarkClex) October 21, 2023
98 Randy Johnson coming out of the pen tomorrow