99.9%texasaggie2015 said:
99% of fans who get mad at a player for taking the bigger contract would do the exact same thing
Doesn't change they aren't judgemental people.
No different than when a co-worker leaves and struggles.
99.9%texasaggie2015 said:
99% of fans who get mad at a player for taking the bigger contract would do the exact same thing
I guess I don't hold it against him since that whole thing happened just moments after losing the World Series. Emotions are high.W said:
there's a gracious way to leave an organization...and a not so gracious way
he chose the wrong path
This is why I was pissed to see him get a rest day on Sunday. He's finally getting it together and sees the bench on the same day the Altuve is DH and Maldy is behind the plate.Beat40 said:He's looked a lot better to me. He's brought the toe-tap back since the ASB. Glad to see the numbers support it.bearkatag15 said:Jeremy Pena is quietly slashing .328/.419/.391 in the his last 74 PA's, which spans 17 games.
— Jeremy Branham (@JeremyBranham) August 14, 2023
I'm impressed and a bit shocked. It has been pretty quiet for him while putting up those numbers.
Would like to see a couple more HRs, but it's good to see him looking better at the plate.
texasaggie2015 said:
Serious question- why the hate towards Gerrit Cole? I've never really understood that. Not being critical, just asking. The way I see it, he pitched his ass off, was rightfully frustrated after the WS loss and then took the bigger contract. No hard feelings there.
For me it's how he handled the loss. Having to be begged to talk to the media after the game...saying stuff like "I'm not employed by the Astros anymore. Why should I talk to the media? I guess I'll talk, but I'll represent myself" and then coming out in his agent's hat. He just came across as a complete ******. I loved watching him pitch for Houston, but sometimes last impressions make all the difference.AgLA06 said:Eh, it's hard to feel sorry for a guy who supposedly took the money over a better team who isn't getting the support he claimed was the reason going. I'm sure it comes off as Karma from a lot of Astros fans who realized another stud pitcher could mean leading the division today.Mr President Elect said:I feel the same. He was lights out from June onward that season and was a lot of fun to watch.texasaggie2015 said:
Serious question- why the hate towards Gerrit Cole? I've never really understood that. Not being critical, just asking. The way I see it, he pitched his ass off, was rightfully frustrated after the WS loss and then took the bigger contract. No hard feelings there.
Oh, I don't feel sorry for him at all. He is a very rich guy playing a game that we all love for a living. Just saying, I don't root against him at all.AgLA06 said:Eh, it's hard to feel sorry for a guy who supposedly took the money over a better team who isn't getting the support he claimed was the reason going. I'm sure it comes off as Karma from a lot of Astros fans who realized another stud pitcher could mean leading the division today.Mr President Elect said:I feel the same. He was lights out from June onward that season and was a lot of fun to watch.texasaggie2015 said:
Serious question- why the hate towards Gerrit Cole? I've never really understood that. Not being critical, just asking. The way I see it, he pitched his ass off, was rightfully frustrated after the WS loss and then took the bigger contract. No hard feelings there.
He put on a freaking Scott Boras hat on after we lost the WS and acted like a ***** on his way out. He couldn't make it another hour or two? Nobody likes losing, but come on dude.texasaggie2015 said:
Serious question- why the hate towards Gerrit Cole? I've never really understood that. Not being critical, just asking. The way I see it, he pitched his ass off, was rightfully frustrated after the WS loss and then took the bigger contract. No hard feelings there.
Danwell Home said:He put on a freaking Scott Boras hat on after we lost the WS and acted like a ***** on his way out. He couldn't make it another hour or two? Nobody likes losing, but come on dude.texasaggie2015 said:
Serious question- why the hate towards Gerrit Cole? I've never really understood that. Not being critical, just asking. The way I see it, he pitched his ass off, was rightfully frustrated after the WS loss and then took the bigger contract. No hard feelings there.
Ag_07 said:
Because fck that guy...That's why
texasaggie2015 said:
Serious question- why the hate towards Gerrit Cole? I've never really understood that. Not being critical, just asking. The way I see it, he pitched his ass off, was rightfully frustrated after the WS loss and then took the bigger contract. No hard feelings there.
Jose Altuve was named AL Player of the Week.
— Matt Kawahara (@matthewkawahara) August 14, 2023
Really just highlighting an unrelated point. The Astros have been extremely top heavy.Quote:
The Astros currently rank third in the American League in runs scored not an uncommon sight for a franchise that has only been outscored by the Dodgers and Red Sox over the last decade. But they've done it with a lineup with some pretty big holes, with half of their eight players with at least 300 plate appearances this season posting an OBP under .300. The team's offense has been driven this year mainly by four players: Kyle Tucker, Yordan Alvarez, Alex Bregman, and Chas McCormick, with an assist from Yainer Diaz. A year ago, Houston signed Alvarez to a six-year, $115 million contract extension that ensured he would remain in town until the end of the 2028 season. Tucker, though, does not have a long-term deal and is scheduled to hit free agency after the 2025 season. What would a possible deal look like?
[url=https://www.fangraphs.com/players/gerrit-cole/13125/stats][/url]This would be uncharted territory. Altuve's deal is kind of a good comp. He was on a team friendly deal not too dissimilar from what a player would get in arbitration. He also signed with 2 years remaining. And he would have hit FA at 30 vs Tucker at 29. The new money was basically 5/151.5.Quote:
Based on franchise history, being one of Houston's stars doesn't necessarily grant a ton of leverage when it comes to landing big contract extensions. Jose Altuve signed a seven-year, $163.5 million deal before the 2018 season, but that remains the largest contract in team history. The Astros didn't participate in any bidding wars for previous stars like George Springer, Carlos Correa, and Gerrit Cole
TED is very good. In case anyone was confused.Quote:
Tucker has certainly earned a big payday. Since grabbing the a full-time spot in the lineup in 2020, he's hit .280/.351/.516 with a wRC+ of 137. That's good enough to rank fifth in baseball among outfielder in WAR, at 15.1, behind only Aaron Judge, Mookie Betts, Juan Soto, and Ronald Acuña Jr. This year, Tucker's on track to hit the five-WAR mark for the first time.
This is the good info. If I am reading this correctly this would buy out 24 and 25 then add on another 7 years. If we assume 12.5 and 17.5 M for 24 and 25 (taking a stab at arbitration #s) then it would basically be a 7/214 deal when he hits FA. That sounds perfectly reasonable.Quote:
In my chat last week, I mentioned ZiPS suggesting nine years and $220 million as a reasonable extension for Tucker, but that was also from the start of the season. If he were a free agent, this projection suggests a nine-year, $284 million extension (or $265 million over eight years). Tucker obviously is not a free agent, and his next two years the most likely best seasons remaining in his career will be under team control. ZiPS expects the difference between what he would get in free agency the next two years versus what he's likely to get in arbitration as about $40 million, taking it to a nine-year, $244 million deal. Hurting Tucker's chances of hitting the $300 million threshold is the simple fact that while he's not as old as Judge was when he hit free agency, he's also going to be 29 at the start of his new contract, not a mid-20s phenom like Soto or Manny Machado.
Would the Astros do that deal? I'm not sure, since we're talking an $80 million bump over their largest deal to date, and that's way more years than the team is typically comfortable with. A six-year deal comes out at $176 million, in the same ballpark as Altuve's deal (which runs out after 2024). It's more than Alvarez got, but in that case, the team was able to lock up a deal before the slugger got to arbitration and so had considerably more leverage.
More good points. 100% agree with not out of the question for the Astros to be more willing to do this deal because the next crop is less of a sure thing. It makes more sense to sign a 29-year-old than it does a 31 or 35-year-old.Quote:
Would the Astros do that deal? I'm not sure, since we're talking an $80 million bump over their largest deal to date, and that's way more years than the team is typically comfortable with. A six-year deal comes out at $176 million, in the same ballpark as Altuve's deal (which runs out after 2024). It's more than Alvarez got, but in that case, the team was able to lock up a deal before the slugger got to arbitration and so had considerably more leverage.
But in this case, I'm not positive that the Astros wouldn't come to such a deal, either, especially if we're talking six or seven years. They've let players walk before, but Tucker's free agency would come a year after Altuve and Bregman reach the end of their deals; even if they stay with the organization, their next contracts will probably cover their declines (almost certainly for the former). That's an awful lot of offensive production to replace quickly. When Springer was in his arbitration years, the Astros knew Alvarez and Tucker were coming; I don't see anyone in the organization right now that fits that role. I think there's a real chance that when Brown expressed an interest in keeping Tucker on the team for the long term, it was more than the usual fan-friendly soundbites that every public-facing front office member knows how to do by heart.
texasaggie2015 said:
Anyone have an educated guess as to who will start Saturday? Urquidy? I have tickets so I'm curious
just fyi, lineup complaints on this thread are usually ~4 hrs prior to gametime.BadAggie said:
Hey Dusty, got a game in a couple hours, where's the lineup?
Danwell Home said:He put on a freaking Scott Boras hat on after we lost the WS and acted like a ***** on his way out. He couldn't make it another hour or two? Nobody likes losing, but come on dude.texasaggie2015 said:
Serious question- why the hate towards Gerrit Cole? I've never really understood that. Not being critical, just asking. The way I see it, he pitched his ass off, was rightfully frustrated after the WS loss and then took the bigger contract. No hard feelings there.
texasaggie2015 said:
Serious question- why the hate towards Gerrit Cole? I've never really understood that. Not being critical, just asking. The way I see it, he pitched his ass off, was rightfully frustrated after the WS loss and then took the bigger contract. No hard feelings there.
Dusty and his misplaced belief that Diaz can't hit lefties.BadAggie said:
Dusty gets alternating RL through top 7 in lineup.
Don't hate the lineup other than when you DH Yordan by default Diaz loses potential ABs
BMX Bandit said:Quote:
Dave Parker and Willie Stargell hit back-to-back for the mid-to-late 70's Pittsburgh Pirates
Interestingly, against lefty starters they were split up by bill Robinson