SpaceCityAg05 said:
Regardless of the numbers, I think you see more attempts to hit the ball the other way than outright bunts for two reasons: (1) the possibility of moving the runner over without automatically recording an out, (2) there are fewer reliable bunters in baseball than ever as it has become a lost art.
That is why even in scenarios where the sac bunt COULD make sense, it may still not be the right play if you don't have confidence in the bunting ability of your hitter. The nightmare scenario is where the bunter pops one up for an out or fouls off two bunts before meekly striking out and wasting an out.
Likewise, strikeouts are the biggest killers in these one-run scenarios.
I think we're overall on the same page. I think overall, whether your just trying to score 1 run or multiple runs, teams aren't willing to give up the run expectancy from either scenario to get a guy on 2B to 3B and 1 out. That's my inference based on all teams' actions.
It doesn't mean the bunt doesn't work or wouldn't be the right decision in the right circumstances.
It just doesn't mean the Astros wouldn't be 0-5 in extra innings if they bunted a guy to 3B and just tried to put the ball in play every time.