Quito said:
I don't understand why a player or parent would enjoy this. My 12U plays major and we are middle of the road major team in most tourneys we play. I love that all our games are close and competition has been good. Love the struggles and how they can overcome at times.
There are usually 1-2 top tier major teams that are only teams with chance to win unless something drastic happens
I guess it's folks taking Malcolm Gladwell's study of youth hockey in Canada and relative ages/birth dates to a somewhat extreme end.
Look at the roster for
Banditos LLT6- they're the #3 13U team in the country and all but 2 of their players are older than my oldest who plays 14U. And I know for a fact that 6 of the 11 on their roster used to be class of 2028 but reclassified to 2029 and I'm told the one 2028 kid is in the process of reclassifying to 2029. We've been asked if we'd have our son play on age-level with 2 of these nationally-ranked 13U teams here in Houston instead of 14U and one asked us if we'd pull him out of school to home-school and reclassify to 2029- we declined.
I'm not convinced that it does any good, especially once you get to HS and are playing with older kids. I know there are 2 freshman on the varsity at Summer Creek HS where my son will attend next year. It's been a rebuilding year and the team is 14-14 but 2nd in district and just clinched a playoff spot. Anyway, one freshman has zero ABs but has 10 IP with 14 BB and 10 K with a 3.5 ERA. The other has just 27 PA over the season and a .130 BA, .200 OBP, and .330 OPS. He also has 26.1 IP with 17 BB and 37 K with a 2.13 ERA. Both of them are highly considered as prospects by PG.
So 2 kids who are studs and will be fine as they mature in HS and as long as they stay healthy and take care of business off the field both will play beyond HS, but are struggling right now vs. older, more mature players. Based on what I know of these 2 kids and families, this is the first time ever for either one that they are not the unquestioned stud and best player on their teams.
My point being that even if you hold a kid back and have them play youth baseball (14U and younger) where they're as old as they can possibly be for their division with an eye on getting ready for HS and beyond, when they get to HS they are going to have to compete with kids who are older, more mature (physically & mentally), and more experienced. If you're playing 6A baseball in Texas, unless you're an absolute freak on the level of a Bryce Harper or Mike Trout as a hitter or Josh Beckett or Clayton Kershaw as a pitcher you're going to struggle. And even those guys (except for maybe Harper) probably needed to develop physically between their respective freshman & senior seasons (Harper dropped out, got his GED, and went juco at like 16) to become as dominant as they were in HS.