None of these areas are likely to get a new ballpark anytime soon, well maybe the ChiSox and I know there is discussion of replacing Kaufman Stadium (boo!). Of course I didn't think the Rangers or Braves needed new parks so who knows.bluefire579 said:I said this same thing back when the delay happened against the Yankees. I'm also of the firm stance than any new stadium not built on the California coast needs to have a retractable roof. No one should be forced to play baseball in early April weather in places like Minneapolis, Boston, Denver, etc., and that need only grows when it gets to be late October or early November with how volatile cold fronts in those places are.Beau Holder said:
No but it is annoying as hell.
It's a drizzle. Play the game. It's the least you can do if you're not requiring new parks to have retractable roofs.
Simple question, who is mandate this rule? I would think owners would have to vote on it and I'm not sure that the votes are there. There has been a number of new parks built since the Orioles debut Camden Yards in 1990 and only two clubs where weather might be a chilly in April or Oct/Nov changed their roof status; Twins ditched the roof, Brewers added one. I have plenty family in Wisconsin and the most ardent Brewers fans among them while appreciative of the modern amenities the newer park really miss the openness of the old County Stadium.