3 years?! **** that
that tweet wasn't accurate... its 2 years for $30mMr.Bond said:
3 years?! **** that
Wabs said:And be around this/theseAustinCountyAg said:this is what logic tell me as well......my astros fan boy in me is telling me he wants to play on one of the best current rosters in the league and compete for a title, hang out with Bregs in the clubs, enjoy the tax benefit of TX, and bang texican chicks.Wabs said:
Then main reason I don't see Harper in Houston is that he probably wants to play in either NY, LA, CHI, or maybe PHI. The Astros will have to pay a premium to get him to commit to Houston long term. The Nats offered 10 years for $300M. It seems the Astros would have to go something like $32-35M per year to get him to listen.
I wonder if he would have taken the qualifying offer (1 year, $18M) over 3 & 30. I guess he would have, or we would have offered it and at least gotten the draft pick out of the deal.CFTXAG10 said:
Can't blame Charlie gettin' that paper
The two things can both be true at the same time. The market is what someone is willing to pay for him. Time will tell whether the Rays overpaid or not.AustinCountyAg said:
Or the rays are severely over paying??
He's only made 40 million prior to this season... guaranteed another 30 is a lot to him.Farmer1906 said:
We offered 1 year and 1 option year right after the season ended. It was probably for under the QO, but I can't imagine it being that much less than what Tampa offered. I guess he wanted to comfort of 2 years.
1996 said:
Only 40 million....