***********2024-2025 San Antonio Spurs Thread********************

597,765 Views | 5039 Replies | Last: 9 mo ago by AggieEP
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?


I think he's a solid late 1st or 2nd D&3 choice
West Texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Edgecombe measured better than I thought he would.

Bailey is smaller, but he's still gonna be 6'9 in shoes and has a good wingspan.

Jase Richardson…. Brutal measurements.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2md round stretch 4

Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
West Texan said:

Edgecombe measured better than I thought he would.

Bailey is smaller, but he's still gonna be 6'9 in shoes and has a good wingspan.

Jase Richardson…. Brutal measurements.


I might move VJ over Ace. I thought he would be 6'1-6'2
West Texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guitarsoup said:

West Texan said:

Edgecombe measured better than I thought he would.

Bailey is smaller, but he's still gonna be 6'9 in shoes and has a good wingspan.

Jase Richardson…. Brutal measurements.


I might move VJ over Ace. I thought he would be 6'1-6'2


I still have Bailey higher. 6'8-6'9 wings that can shoot like him don't come around very often. He also wouldn't have to come in and try and do too much, so he'd have plenty of time to develop his on ball skills in a controlled environment (like we were able to with Kawhi). I do like VJ a lot, we just have to start adding more size on the wings at some point and if I'm choosing between the two, I'm taking Bailey.
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oof oof oof on Kon's measurements also. There's just no way I see him being a contributor defensively, so that means he needs to be elite offensively and I'm not sure he can be.

Sorber and Fleming's wingspans are very impressive and would obviously contribute to causing deflections and challenging shots.

Bryant measured smaller than I thought he would, the game tape though shows him to be disruptive defensively, so we'll see how the rest of the draft process treats him.

If we stay put, I'd take a draft of Bryant and Fleming.
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
West Texan said:

Guitarsoup said:

West Texan said:

Edgecombe measured better than I thought he would.

Bailey is smaller, but he's still gonna be 6'9 in shoes and has a good wingspan.

Jase Richardson…. Brutal measurements.


I might move VJ over Ace. I thought he would be 6'1-6'2


I still have Bailey higher. 6'8-6'9 wings that can shoot like him don't come around very often. He also wouldn't have to come in and try and do too much, so he'd have plenty of time to develop his on ball skills in a controlled environment (like we were able to with Kawhi). I do like VJ a lot, we just have to start adding more size on the wings at some point and if I'm choosing between the two, I'm taking Bailey.


I agree on the length and skill, we need it in the worst way to make us into real contenders.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?


First choice for our 2nd round pick
West Texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieEP said:

Oof oof oof on Kon's measurements also. There's just no way I see him being a contributor defensively, so that means he needs to be elite offensively and I'm not sure he can be.

Sorber and Fleming's wingspans are very impressive and would obviously contribute to causing deflections and challenging shots.

Bryant measured smaller than I thought he would, the game tape though shows him to be disruptive defensively, so we'll see how the rest of the draft process treats him.

If we stay put, I'd take a draft of Bryant and Fleming.



I'm not surprised by Kon's measurements at all. His selling point is his offense and having enough IQ to find a way to not be a total waste on defense.

Sorber and Fleming both very impressive wingspans. Having +9" arms is crazy length.
West Texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Soup has gone into more detail on our cap situation recently, but here's a graphic for it.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
West Texan said:

AggieEP said:

Oof oof oof on Kon's measurements also. There's just no way I see him being a contributor defensively, so that means he needs to be elite offensively and I'm not sure he can be.

Sorber and Fleming's wingspans are very impressive and would obviously contribute to causing deflections and challenging shots.

Bryant measured smaller than I thought he would, the game tape though shows him to be disruptive defensively, so we'll see how the rest of the draft process treats him.

If we stay put, I'd take a draft of Bryant and Fleming.



I'm not surprised by Kon's measurements at all. His selling point is his offense and having enough IQ to find a way to not be a total waste on defense.

Sorber and Fleming both very impressive wingspans. Having +9" arms is crazy length.


He came in a little heavier, which is good, but he's shorter than Steph with just a +1 wingspan.

So the question is if he will be closer to Luke kennard or Tyler Herro. He's got both those guys a little bit on size but they're both negative Defenders.

Herro has a negative wingspan

I still think Kon might be gone by 8/9 so that means we might do Bryant+Fleming or Bryant+Sorber.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
West Texan said:

Guitarsoup said:

West Texan said:

Edgecombe measured better than I thought he would.

Bailey is smaller, but he's still gonna be 6'9 in shoes and has a good wingspan.

Jase Richardson…. Brutal measurements.


I might move VJ over Ace. I thought he would be 6'1-6'2


I still have Bailey higher. 6'8-6'9 wings that can shoot like him don't come around very often. He also wouldn't have to come in and try and do too much, so he'd have plenty of time to develop his on ball skills in a controlled environment (like we were able to with Kawhi). I do like VJ a lot, we just have to start adding more size on the wings at some point and if I'm choosing between the two, I'm taking Bailey.
I just think that VJ is a much higher IQ player and a much better defender. VJ coming in 2-3 inches over expectations and Ace coming in 3" under is a pretty big deal.

If we get the 3rd pick with the Hawks, I might consider VJ at 3 and Carter Bryant at 9.
West Texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guitarsoup said:

West Texan said:

AggieEP said:

Oof oof oof on Kon's measurements also. There's just no way I see him being a contributor defensively, so that means he needs to be elite offensively and I'm not sure he can be.

Sorber and Fleming's wingspans are very impressive and would obviously contribute to causing deflections and challenging shots.

Bryant measured smaller than I thought he would, the game tape though shows him to be disruptive defensively, so we'll see how the rest of the draft process treats him.

If we stay put, I'd take a draft of Bryant and Fleming.



I'm not surprised by Kon's measurements at all. His selling point is his offense and having enough IQ to find a way to not be a total waste on defense.

Sorber and Fleming both very impressive wingspans. Having +9" arms is crazy length.


He came in a little heavier, which is good, but he's shorter than Steph with just a +1 wingspan.

So the question is if he will be closer to Luke kennard or Tyler Herro. He's got both those guys a little bit on size but they're both negative Defenders.

Herro has a negative wingspan


I think Kon is/will be stronger than both of those guys and rebounds better, so he'll hold his own on switches to bigs better imo. Getting switched into quicker guards, he's gonna struggle.

Offensively, I think he'll be closer to Herro than Kennard. He's got some really nice passing instincts and looked really good with the ball in his hands as the primary guy during those games in the ACC tournament where Flagg was out.
West Texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guitarsoup said:

West Texan said:

Guitarsoup said:

West Texan said:

Edgecombe measured better than I thought he would.

Bailey is smaller, but he's still gonna be 6'9 in shoes and has a good wingspan.

Jase Richardson…. Brutal measurements.


I might move VJ over Ace. I thought he would be 6'1-6'2


I still have Bailey higher. 6'8-6'9 wings that can shoot like him don't come around very often. He also wouldn't have to come in and try and do too much, so he'd have plenty of time to develop his on ball skills in a controlled environment (like we were able to with Kawhi). I do like VJ a lot, we just have to start adding more size on the wings at some point and if I'm choosing between the two, I'm taking Bailey.
I just think that VJ is a much higher IQ player and a much better defender. VJ coming in 2-3 inches over expectations and Ace coming in 3" under is a pretty big deal.

If we get the 3rd pick with the Hawks, I might consider VJ at 3 and Carter Bryant at 9.


I like VJ a lot and wouldn't be upset at all if we're able to move up and get him. Just saying I like Bailey's potential over his.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
West Texan said:

Guitarsoup said:

West Texan said:

AggieEP said:

Oof oof oof on Kon's measurements also. There's just no way I see him being a contributor defensively, so that means he needs to be elite offensively and I'm not sure he can be.

Sorber and Fleming's wingspans are very impressive and would obviously contribute to causing deflections and challenging shots.

Bryant measured smaller than I thought he would, the game tape though shows him to be disruptive defensively, so we'll see how the rest of the draft process treats him.

If we stay put, I'd take a draft of Bryant and Fleming.



I'm not surprised by Kon's measurements at all. His selling point is his offense and having enough IQ to find a way to not be a total waste on defense.

Sorber and Fleming both very impressive wingspans. Having +9" arms is crazy length.


He came in a little heavier, which is good, but he's shorter than Steph with just a +1 wingspan.

So the question is if he will be closer to Luke kennard or Tyler Herro. He's got both those guys a little bit on size but they're both negative Defenders.

Herro has a negative wingspan


I think Kon is/will be stronger than both of those guys and rebounds better, so he'll hold his own on switches to bigs better imo. Getting switched into quicker guards, he's gonna struggle.

Offensively, I think he'll be closer to Herro than Kennard. He's got some really nice passing instincts and looked really good with the ball in his hands as the primary guy during those games in the ACC tournament where Flagg was out.
Keldon was 6'4.5 216lb 6'9 wingspan with 8'8 standing reach.

Kon is essentially in Keldon's body with less arms (8'5 standing reach.)

Herro put up 24/5/5 this year and has good shooting numbers. If you think that's what Kon can be, he is a no brainer. He's also 20-30lbs heavier than Herro.

I think you take him because maybe that is who he is. But the possibility that he's a 6th-7th man.
West Texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guitarsoup said:

West Texan said:

Guitarsoup said:

West Texan said:

AggieEP said:

Oof oof oof on Kon's measurements also. There's just no way I see him being a contributor defensively, so that means he needs to be elite offensively and I'm not sure he can be.

Sorber and Fleming's wingspans are very impressive and would obviously contribute to causing deflections and challenging shots.

Bryant measured smaller than I thought he would, the game tape though shows him to be disruptive defensively, so we'll see how the rest of the draft process treats him.

If we stay put, I'd take a draft of Bryant and Fleming.



I'm not surprised by Kon's measurements at all. His selling point is his offense and having enough IQ to find a way to not be a total waste on defense.

Sorber and Fleming both very impressive wingspans. Having +9" arms is crazy length.


He came in a little heavier, which is good, but he's shorter than Steph with just a +1 wingspan.

So the question is if he will be closer to Luke kennard or Tyler Herro. He's got both those guys a little bit on size but they're both negative Defenders.

Herro has a negative wingspan


I think Kon is/will be stronger than both of those guys and rebounds better, so he'll hold his own on switches to bigs better imo. Getting switched into quicker guards, he's gonna struggle.

Offensively, I think he'll be closer to Herro than Kennard. He's got some really nice passing instincts and looked really good with the ball in his hands as the primary guy during those games in the ACC tournament where Flagg was out.
Keldon was 6'4.5 216lb 6'9 wingspan with 8'8 standing reach.

Kon is essentially in Keldon's body with less arms (8'5 standing reach.)

Herro put up 24/5/5 this year and has good shooting numbers. If you think that's what Kon can be, he is a no brainer. He's also 20-30lbs heavier than Herro.

I think you take him because maybe that is who he is. But the possibility that he's a 6th-7th man.


If we stay at 8 and Kon is there I think he's a no brainer. He very well may be gone before we pick though. But if we came away with Kon at 8 and Fleming or Sorber at 14, that fills several holes on our current roster.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
West Texan said:

Guitarsoup said:

West Texan said:

Guitarsoup said:

West Texan said:

AggieEP said:

Oof oof oof on Kon's measurements also. There's just no way I see him being a contributor defensively, so that means he needs to be elite offensively and I'm not sure he can be.

Sorber and Fleming's wingspans are very impressive and would obviously contribute to causing deflections and challenging shots.

Bryant measured smaller than I thought he would, the game tape though shows him to be disruptive defensively, so we'll see how the rest of the draft process treats him.

If we stay put, I'd take a draft of Bryant and Fleming.



I'm not surprised by Kon's measurements at all. His selling point is his offense and having enough IQ to find a way to not be a total waste on defense.

Sorber and Fleming both very impressive wingspans. Having +9" arms is crazy length.


He came in a little heavier, which is good, but he's shorter than Steph with just a +1 wingspan.

So the question is if he will be closer to Luke kennard or Tyler Herro. He's got both those guys a little bit on size but they're both negative Defenders.

Herro has a negative wingspan


I think Kon is/will be stronger than both of those guys and rebounds better, so he'll hold his own on switches to bigs better imo. Getting switched into quicker guards, he's gonna struggle.

Offensively, I think he'll be closer to Herro than Kennard. He's got some really nice passing instincts and looked really good with the ball in his hands as the primary guy during those games in the ACC tournament where Flagg was out.
Keldon was 6'4.5 216lb 6'9 wingspan with 8'8 standing reach.

Kon is essentially in Keldon's body with less arms (8'5 standing reach.)

Herro put up 24/5/5 this year and has good shooting numbers. If you think that's what Kon can be, he is a no brainer. He's also 20-30lbs heavier than Herro.

I think you take him because maybe that is who he is. But the possibility that he's a 6th-7th man.


If we stay at 8 and Kon is there I think he's a no brainer. He very well may be gone before we pick though. But if we came away with Kon at 8 and Fleming or Sorber at 14, that fills several holes on our current roster.
Yeah, I agree. I think that is the way you play it. My choice at 14 is probably Bryant then Fleming then Sorber, but Fleming's size really makes me want to pick him.

Fleming is going to be 6'10 235 in shoes with a 7'6 wingspan and he shot 56/39/74 this year.

Bailey shot 46/35/69 this year and is shorter and doesn't defend as well.

Bryant is a more polished defender and defended against higher level competition. But Fleming is 2" taller, 6" longer wingspan, and 20lbs heavier. And we need a PF that can stretch the floor. Fleming just feels like a taller/longer Naz Reid starter kit to me.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Miles Byrd is the Bruce Bowen of this draft... without the corner three. However, he shot 83% from the line.

He can't finish at the rim, hit threes (38/30/83 shooting), dribble, or pass, but he's a menace on defense.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1 hour count down. ESPN and/or StreamEast.

TyHolden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guitarsoup said:

1 hour count down. ESPN and/or StreamEast.


was this after she found out she got the Showgirls role?
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't really like KOC's draft opinions so far this year, but he's going live for the draft. That's probably better than ESPN:

https://www.youtube.com/live/HgoiEdpdMxA
TyHolden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is there any other place to watch this besides ESPN? Do people typically watch this stuff? Compared to TNT, it's dreadful. Who are these chicks talking?
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Click the link in the post above yours.
DTP02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When the Spurs won the lottery two years ago I threw on my 5 trophy spurs shirt and drove around the neighborhood honking and yelling out Go Spurs Go much to the amusement and confusion of several neighbors.

I've got my shirt ready.
TyHolden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guitarsoup said:

Click the link in the post above yours.
this is good - thanks!
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In addition to the Spurs getting two top 4 picks, we also want Sacramento to get a top 4 pick. If they do, Atlanta only has the Laker's pick in the 20s.

Sacramento pick is top 12 protected and will be 13 or 14 if it does't go top 4.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KOC just moved this D&3 guy from Wazzu up to 14th on his big board.

Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This guy is interesting. Put up big numbers at UAB.

superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Watched a bit of UAB hoops this past season (i live there) and got kinda a Paul Millsap/DeJuan Blair type. Had some eye opening games in the AAC tournament. He passed my eye test as someone who had canine internal immeasurables.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hawks pick and Kings picks stayed 14 and 13.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mavs get a top 4 pick

Houston didnt move.

SPURS MOVE UP TO TOP 4
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lmaooooo spurs in top 4
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Philly keeps their pick, OKC doesnt get it
AGpops1923
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whoop!!
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Spurs have never moved down in the draft.

This is the first time the Mavs have moved up.
First Page Last Page
Page 92 of 144 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.