I think the series is a coin flip. I'm picking Spurs in 7.
Go Spurs.
Same. I don't think either team has a huge advantage and there are variables that are impossible to know (will the shooters show up for Houston, will LMA and Tony Parker show up for SA?)
I think it is a coin flip. If the Rockets don't close out in 6, I have a hard time believing they will win in San Antonio in game 7.
I think the series is a coin flip. I'm picking Spurs in 7.
Go Spurs.
Same. I don't think either team has a huge advantage and there are variables that are impossible to know (will the shooters show up for Houston, will LMA and Tony Parker show up for SA?)
I think it is a coin flip. If the Rockets don't close out in 6, I have a hard time believing they will win in San Antonio in game 7.
I pretty much agree, coin flip but Spurs have the edge in game seven. Looking forward to the series!
Watch listed. Although judging from the dialogue so far I doubt that I will get into this sesspool thread.
I'll leave it here. This is a great matchup and very even. I think the Spurs will enjoy playing against the Rox defense and these will be relatively high scoring games. The x-factor is the Spurs bigs. If LA, Pau, Lee and Dedmon can really and truly dominate the glass while not getting killed too badly on the peri meter then we'll see the Spurs win.
The 2nd x-factor is Ariza on Kawhi. If Kawhi doesn't score 30+ each night then the Rockets win.
I think the most deciding factor in the series will be the Rockets 3 shooting. It's really hard to beat them when they're shooting 40%. I doubt they will do that, though. I think the series will either be Rockets in 6 or Spurs in 7.
The 2nd x-factor is Ariza on Kawhi. If Kawhi doesn't score 30+ each night then the Rockets win.
Especially the fact that Houston doesn't have a second option to guard Kawhi. If Ariza is getting tired or gets in foul trouble, then what is plan B? Beverley is too small - Kawhi will just back him down. Kawhi will blow past Anderson and Gordon and Harden are poor defenders.
If the Rockets try to go small ball with Ariza at 4, then if the Spurs stay big (because really who cares if LMA or Lee is guarding Ariza?) then the Rockets have huge matchup problems on defense.
Capela -> LMA Ariza -> Lee Gordon -> Kawhi Harden -> Green Bev - > Parker
That's going to be a beating for Houston unless Gordon and Bev are getting clean looks. But the other way around, because Ariza isn't really a threat to put the ball on the floor consistently and Kawhi can guard players much smaller, you can play Lee or LMA on Ariza without worrying.
Having Bev helps the Rockets a lot defensively with every team in the WC except the Spurs because the Spurs don't really rely on PGs as much because Parker is way past his prime and Patty is super streaky. But against a team like GSW or LAC where their PG runs the team, it helps a ton.
So Ariza being able to man up on Kawhi for 44m/game and hitting some timely shots is going to be hugely important.
Watching these highlights from this season, Ariza's defense doesn't scare me too much.
Watch listed. Although judging from the dialogue so far I doubt that I will get into this sesspool thread.
I'll leave it here. This is a great matchup and very even. I think the Spurs will enjoy playing against the Rox defense and these will be relatively high scoring games. The x-factor is the Spurs bigs. If LA, Pau, Lee and Dedmon can really and truly dominate the glass while not getting killed too badly on the peri meter then we'll see the Spurs win.
The 2nd x-factor is Ariza on Kawhi. If Kawhi doesn't score 30+ each night then the Rockets win.
You think this is a cesspool? I think it's been pretty civil. As a Houston fan, I respect the Spurs and generally cheer for them when they're not playing Houston. It's pretty hard to find something not to like about Pop, Ginobli, Leonard, or Robinson and Duncan for that matter. LMA is a POS, but he's the exception.
This is the Canadian version of a cesspool, I think.
Watch listed. Although judging from the dialogue so far I doubt that I will get into this sesspool thread.
I'll leave it here. This is a great matchup and very even. I think the Spurs will enjoy playing against the Rox defense and these will be relatively high scoring games. The x-factor is the Spurs bigs. If LA, Pau, Lee and Dedmon can really and truly dominate the glass while not getting killed too badly on the peri meter then we'll see the Spurs win.
The 2nd x-factor is Ariza on Kawhi. If Kawhi doesn't score 30+ each night then the Rockets win.
You think this is a cesspool? I think it's been pretty civil. As a Houston fan, I respect the Spurs and generally cheer for them when they're not playing Houston. It's pretty hard to find something not to like about Pop, Ginobli, Leonard, or Robinson and Duncan for that matter. LMA is a POS, but he's the exception.
This is the Canadian version of a cesspool, I think.
Sure I've seen worse. I'm in the same boat in that I generally like the Rockets despite being a life long Spurs fan. I like D'Antoni and I'm one of the few SA natives who likes Houston (the city). It will be interesting to see where this goes.
So, the consensus seem to be that the biggest X-factor is the Rockets' 3-shooting: if it's on, they likely win; if it's off, they likely lose. But it's not as if that's a random occurrence, right? If a traditionally hot 3-pt shooting team goes cold, isn't it probably because the other team did something deliberate to take that away from them, rather than them mysteriously being "off"? Yes, a player can have an "off" game, but if a whole team has an "off" game, or an "off" series, then ... no, something specific is happening. Either the other team is simply more talented, or they specifically sought to take away the 3.
So the question is: whatever OKC did, can the Spurs do it too? More to the point: Will they?
The rockets get PLENTY of open looks against most teams, including the thunder. They were just straight up missing wide open 3s a lot, it had nothing to do with it being contested or well defended. They've had streaks of good and bad all year. They need the good to show up this series because it didn't last series.
Now obviously, San antonio will be better about cutting down on those wide open looks, but we'll still get our looks and we have to hit them.
"They were just straight up missing wide open 3s a lot, it had nothing to do with it being contested or well defended."
But that makes no sense. Teams shoot the 3 better uncontested than contested; otherwise the opposing team wouldn't bother to contest them. That's what I'm saying: when a team goes cold from 3-pt land for a whole series, there is a reason. It's not just bad luck or whatever. The Rockets aren't going to magically rediscover the deep ball against the Spurs. They may indeed get it back, but if they do it will just mean that OKC had a way to shut it down that the Spurs don't.
I guess we just disagree on OKC "having a way to shut it down" when they obviously didn't. We just weren't shooting good. It's not like 3 pt shooting is something you have to have a consistent percentage with under the same conditions week in and week out.
Rockets are the only Western Conference team Tim Duncan never eliminated in the playoffs. (Because they were never in the playoffs long enough, if at all.)
Rockets are the only Western Conference team Tim Duncan never eliminated in the playoffs. (Because they were never in the playoffs long enough, if at all.)