rhp said:
I agree with you. I think the money for the buyout is the issue. TA has talked about money issues with the coming of profit sharing in July.
The ghost of Jimbo haunts us.
rhp said:
I agree with you. I think the money for the buyout is the issue. TA has talked about money issues with the coming of profit sharing in July.
MadDog73 said:
G has too big of an ego to step aside.
TA is not responsible for giving G the extension and shouldn't be on the hook to buy out a bad contract. He also was not involved with the Jimbo mess that created our financial situation. So, stop whining about it. It is what it is. We will have to suffer through another bad season.
But, I will still be there next year rooting for whoever dons the Maroon and White. And I know you will be too.
Whether we want to acknowledge it or not, there is this big event, perhaps the biggest single one time event ever in college athletics finance called House vs NCAA. Before anything like Jimbo's buyout, our AD has a fully new expense line item in his budget of ~$20M annually due to this.Quote:
The budget the AD has, this buyout is a rounding error. It tells me he doesn't give a **** about non rev sports.
Gap said:Whether we want to acknowledge it or not, there is this big event, perhaps the biggest single one time event ever in college athletics finance called House vs NCAA. Before anything like Jimbo's buyout, our AD has a fully new expense line item in his budget of ~$20M annually due to this.Quote:
The budget the AD has, this buyout is a rounding error. It tells me he doesn't give a **** about non rev sports.
But if someone wants to step up and be the benefactor for a sport (soccer or any other) that loses money and has very little revenue associated with it, then I'm sure that person could have significant influence over said program's hirings and firings..
That's great. Cut capex (not in the P&L) for projects already committed and funded by a different entity (12th Man Foundation) and it will somehow be treated as annual revenue or a reduction in expense into perpetuity by the Athletic Department.Astroag said:Or Perhaps we stop spending on unnecessary facilities for programs that aren't winning up to expectations and use the money instead for a coach that gets us to expectation (then build facilities)Gap said:Whether we want to acknowledge it or not, there is this big event, perhaps the biggest single one time event ever in college athletics finance called House vs NCAA. Before anything like Jimbo's buyout, our AD has a fully new expense line item in his budget of ~$20M annually due to this.Quote:
The budget the AD has, this buyout is a rounding error. It tells me he doesn't give a **** about non rev sports.
But if someone wants to step up and be the benefactor for a sport (soccer or any other) that loses money and has very little revenue associated with it, then I'm sure that person could have significant influence over said program's hirings and firings..
MadDog73 said:
How the hell can G look at what is going on and think everything is ok?