Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

**** 2024-25 Transfer Portal Thread ****

63,982 Views | 360 Replies | Last: 2 min ago by soleta27
Jelly Kelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So who have we communicated with and who do you think the Ags will end up getting in this portal season
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The who is completely unknown. Even the coaches probably don't know for sure. They may have an idea on a couple. Most likely as of now is Jacob Zeno and/or Micah Hudson. But even those are too early to know.

So far, it seems DL, WR, and TE are by far the most action, with the right fit at QB. Some of the guys you have mentioned are definitely in the running.
Dex_Mick_Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
beerad12man said:

My guess is:

QB 1
TB 0-1
WR 3-4
TE 2
OL 1
DL 3-4
LB 0-1
DB 1-2

12-16 total.


I don't see that many WRs. We only need 10, with only 6 actually playing. We currently have 9.

I predict we lose one more (maybe Bostick) and add only 2; One proven alpha and one talented unproven like Hudson.
Jelly Kelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ok yeah I believe we will get 2 good edge people and 1 powerful interior DL, and we will get the prude TE and Hudson and KC and fill out or WR. If we are able to pull all of that out I believe we will be able to go far next season
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
beerad12man said:

My guess is:

QB 1
TB 0-1
WR 3-4
TE 2
OL 1
DL 3-4
LB 0-1
DB 1-2

12-16 total.


Very unlikely we take more than 3 WR. My gues it's more like 2-3 with 3 being unlikely.

And the number of transfers i heard was in the 10-15 range.
World's worst proofreader
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't see 12-16 as much different than 10-15. Call it 13-14 in the median.

I think it will be 3 WRs. 4 is possible. Just depends on who we can get in on.
Walton2016
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think the Purdue tightend may be Notre Dame bound at this point
Bogey1996
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What about Daniels from OSU in the S/LB role since we missed on J Williams in recruiting. Wasn't he committed or actually enrolled here and transferred out. I also think we definitely need another RB. Some of the top teams take 2 RB's every year in recruiting. We only have one, that from what some have said did not have the most impressive senior year.
TxAg76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
vander54 said:

TxAg76 said:

vander54 said:

90ags said:

I think we need 3-4 WRs, but want 2-3 that are immediate impact starters / rotation. K Concepcion would be (well, could be -- think in the slot as smaller) while Hudson has 'potential' to be (think would take time and part of the season). We need another 1-2 if they land these 2 regardless.

Not to get confused, Conepcion is above avg and production down in a piss poor offense play at NC State. The KY WR would be better, but don't recall if he's even looking at A&M.


We don't need 3 or 4. That would mean we have no worthy starters.

Grab a true WR1 from the portal and have Thomas outside with Bussey in the slot. Then add a talented guy for depth that may become a starter.



Why do we think we have "worthy starters" right now?
I understand we have guys on the roster who are currently "starting", but if they aren't NFL potential, we need to be rethinking things.

Always be looking to upgrade the roster where you can. If it's a toss up, then make a depth decision. But if it's a legit upgrade, we've gotta try. We're either trying to build a championship caliber roster, or we're not. And right now we don't have one.

As for Bussey, weren't we trying to keep him at DB? And just slid him to WR this year because of how bad we are at WR right now? And is he slated to move back to DB once we get legit "worthy starters"?


You are WAY over simplifying recruiting and roster management. You can't just go replace every guy with NFL talent. You have to pick and choice.
Well gee whiz, no *****? Thanks for pointing out the obvious, Captain.
Doesn't change what I said....if the portal player in question is neutral and not an upgrade, then you make a depth decision.
But if the portal player is a clear upgrade, you HAVE to try for them. Or at least gauge their interest.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
TxAg76 said:

vander54 said:

TxAg76 said:

vander54 said:

90ags said:

I think we need 3-4 WRs, but want 2-3 that are immediate impact starters / rotation. K Concepcion would be (well, could be -- think in the slot as smaller) while Hudson has 'potential' to be (think would take time and part of the season). We need another 1-2 if they land these 2 regardless.

Not to get confused, Conepcion is above avg and production down in a piss poor offense play at NC State. The KY WR would be better, but don't recall if he's even looking at A&M.


We don't need 3 or 4. That would mean we have no worthy starters.

Grab a true WR1 from the portal and have Thomas outside with Bussey in the slot. Then add a talented guy for depth that may become a starter.



Why do we think we have "worthy starters" right now?
I understand we have guys on the roster who are currently "starting", but if they aren't NFL potential, we need to be rethinking things.

Always be looking to upgrade the roster where you can. If it's a toss up, then make a depth decision. But if it's a legit upgrade, we've gotta try. We're either trying to build a championship caliber roster, or we're not. And right now we don't have one.

As for Bussey, weren't we trying to keep him at DB? And just slid him to WR this year because of how bad we are at WR right now? And is he slated to move back to DB once we get legit "worthy starters"?


You are WAY over simplifying recruiting and roster management. You can't just go replace every guy with NFL talent. You have to pick and choice.
Well gee whiz, no *****? Thanks for pointing out the obvious, Captain.
Doesn't change what I said....if the portal player in question is neutral and not an upgrade, then you make a depth decision.
But if the portal player is a clear upgrade, you HAVE to try for them. Or at least gauge their interest.


You don't go after talent just because it's there. You go after talent if it will make a large enough impact on your team. Saying you need to upgrade at all times is blatantly false. You upgrade where it makes sense. And going after 3-4 WR with 2-3 starters does not make sense.
World's worst proofreader
TxAg76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
vander54 said:

TxAg76 said:

vander54 said:

TxAg76 said:

vander54 said:

90ags said:

I think we need 3-4 WRs, but want 2-3 that are immediate impact starters / rotation. K Concepcion would be (well, could be -- think in the slot as smaller) while Hudson has 'potential' to be (think would take time and part of the season). We need another 1-2 if they land these 2 regardless.

Not to get confused, Conepcion is above avg and production down in a piss poor offense play at NC State. The KY WR would be better, but don't recall if he's even looking at A&M.


We don't need 3 or 4. That would mean we have no worthy starters.

Grab a true WR1 from the portal and have Thomas outside with Bussey in the slot. Then add a talented guy for depth that may become a starter.



Why do we think we have "worthy starters" right now?
I understand we have guys on the roster who are currently "starting", but if they aren't NFL potential, we need to be rethinking things.

Always be looking to upgrade the roster where you can. If it's a toss up, then make a depth decision. But if it's a legit upgrade, we've gotta try. We're either trying to build a championship caliber roster, or we're not. And right now we don't have one.

As for Bussey, weren't we trying to keep him at DB? And just slid him to WR this year because of how bad we are at WR right now? And is he slated to move back to DB once we get legit "worthy starters"?


You are WAY over simplifying recruiting and roster management. You can't just go replace every guy with NFL talent. You have to pick and choice.
Well gee whiz, no *****? Thanks for pointing out the obvious, Captain.
Doesn't change what I said....if the portal player in question is neutral and not an upgrade, then you make a depth decision.
But if the portal player is a clear upgrade, you HAVE to try for them. Or at least gauge their interest.


You don't go after talent just because it's there. You go after talent if it will make a large enough impact on your team. Saying you need to upgrade at all times is blatantly false. You upgrade where it makes sense. And going after 3-4 WR with 2-3 starters does not make sense.

Dude, aren't we essentially saying the same thing?

You're saying "go after talent if it will make a large enough impact on your team"....followed by "you upgrade where it makes sense"....

I'm saying "if they're a clear upgrade, you HAVE to try for them, or at least gauge their interest"....

I think our only disconnect is you apparently think we have a bunch of good WR's on the current roster. And I disagree completely.
Not sure about our younger guys that we never saw, but the guys that saw the field this season, i don't know that any top tier team would be overly interested in any of them. Noah included.

Bussey would be the outlier given his youth, but he was slated to be a DB anyway.
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bussey is almost for sure staying at WR and many in the program think it's what he is better at anyways.

But I still think we take 3 WRs. Unless we just simply can't get 3 quality ones.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
I could see 3 but that is probably the max
World's worst proofreader
Bogey1996
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like Ole Miss is spending big again. Already have top Edge, DL and IOL committed.
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They have crystal balls. But not committed.

Either way, portal rankings are probably even worse than high school rankings. Read the tea leaves on who we want and/or who we are recruiting against for a player That's more telling, IMHO. The rankings will be very unreliable. I think they were even worse than HS rankings last portal rankings.

Not to mention that there are probably about 500+ more guys to enter.
SECTAMU#1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It would be nice if we could get William Nwaneri, an edge rusher from Missouri.
Dex_Mick_Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Travis Shaw, NT from UNC.

Very intriguing name...
Dex_Mick_Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SECTAMU#1 said:

It would be nice if we could get William Nwaneri, an edge rusher from Missouri.


If he can play SDE to replace #4 Stewart, that would be great!
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Got somebody, right?

Dex_Mick_Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Duce Robinson, TE from USCw (former 5*) in the portal.
gigem1223
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zeno
Danny Vermin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I will not be shocked if he ends up at Texas.
aggiedad7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dex_Mick_Bear said:

Duce Robinson, TE from USCw (former 5*) in the portal.
Little bit of USC I saw this year, he's pretty damn good.
gigem1223
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dex_Mick_Bear said:

Duce Robinson, TE from USCw (former 5*) in the portal.


He also played baseball at USCw
KCup17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiedad7 said:

Dex_Mick_Bear said:

Duce Robinson, TE from USCw (former 5*) in the portal.
Little bit of USC I saw this year, he's pretty damn good.


I'd rather get Joyner from USC. But this guy is also a potentially huge pick up in a position we need depth at
ahpetty33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Duce had Georgia as his runner up, and his visits were all the biggest brand programs. we never got a visit during his recruitment. Seems like a tall order- is he good enough for a roster spot on our baseball team? Doubtful but maybe that interests him
gigem1223
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well looks like we'll have a shot at Umanmielen. He has A&M in his standout options for schools, along with LSU, Ole Miss, Auburn, FSU and Tech.
TexAgs23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gigem1223 said:

Well looks like we'll have a shot at Umanmielen. He has A&M in his standout options for schools, along with LSU, Ole Miss, Auburn, FSU and Tech.
247 has Umanmielen 100% prediction to Ole Miss
Jelly Kelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is there any updates today about the players we are going to have visit and that we really want to turn this team around?
AggieDub04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mario Craver visiting tomorrow. Speedster who had a good freshman year at Miss State.
TheRatt87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Daniels from Okie State, Perry from Louisville, or someone else similar from the portal is an absolute must. We don't have anyone on the roster to fill the Star role except a current FR (Davis) & an incoming FR.
Kozmozag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And thr 1st portal get is no help.
Jelly Kelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When do those WR come in and visit we need those. Do you think we have a shot at getting them
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Jelly Kelly said:

When do those WR come in and visit we need those. Do you think we have a shot at getting them


Yes we will get a couple and most will be happy
World's worst proofreader
Batty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
beerad12man said:

They have crystal balls. But not committed.

Either way, portal rankings are probably even worse than high school rankings. Read the tea leaves on who we want and/or who we are recruiting against for a player That's more telling, IMHO. The rankings will be very unreliable. I think they were even worse than HS rankings last portal rankings.

Not to mention that there are probably about 500+ more guys to enter.
Did you happen to see the Ole Miss "experts" CB prediction percentages?

https://247sports.com/college/ole-miss/Season/2025-Football/CurrentTargetPredictions/
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.