Lol what a worthless graphic. "Michigan largest 4th quarter comeback wins in last x years:
3 games down by 7"
3 games down by 7"
***** Official Nutless Bovines vs Fighting Alaskan Malamutes *****
157,316 Views |
1788 Replies |
Last: 11 mo ago by TequilaMockingbird
Iraq2xVeteran said:
Washington has outgained Texas 305 (255 passing and 50 rushing) total yards to 213 (97 passing and 116 rushing) total yards, but the game is tied at 21 because of a muffed punt and failed 4th down conversion attempt. Otherwise, Washington would have had a 24-14 lead instead of 21-21 tie.
Can't help but feel tu is going to find a way to steal this game
JohnLA762 said:Aggie Dad Sip said:
The one thing keeping Texas from winning this game is Sark's play calling. As I said yesterday, Texas cannot stop the pass. But Washington can't stop the run. Sark is as stubborn as Jimbo in terms of offensive scheme. Had he just run the ball out of the gate, it would be 21-14 Texas.
Different offensive play calls would have resulted in the same point total but taken 7 off the board for UW?!?
Had Texas run more time off the clock with sustained drives using the running game, yeah. Maybe. It makes me feel better saying it anyway…
Aggie Dad Sip said:JohnLA762 said:Aggie Dad Sip said:
The one thing keeping Texas from winning this game is Sark's play calling. As I said yesterday, Texas cannot stop the pass. But Washington can't stop the run. Sark is as stubborn as Jimbo in terms of offensive scheme. Had he just run the ball out of the gate, it would be 21-14 Texas.
Different offensive play calls would have resulted in the same point total but taken 7 off the board for UW?!?
Had Texas run more time off the clock with sustained drives using the running game, yeah. Maybe. It makes me feel better saying it anyway…
Without a muffed punt it's likely 28-7
rsf0626 said:htxag09 said:LJF78 said:rsf0626 said:
Why the hell did they start this game so late. Its going to go until midnight
So the two semifinals don't overlap
And the first semifinal didn't overlap the early games.
The early games dont matter though.
When they are on the same network , they sort of do.
Sips are going to win this and the natty while at the same time confirming how bad our program is.
Thank God for friends and Crown Royal….and its about to be Supercross season.
Thank God for friends and Crown Royal….and its about to be Supercross season.
This is a gift wrapped match up for tu.
They have a run game to neutralize the passing advantage of Washington.
They have a run game to neutralize the passing advantage of Washington.
How old is this damn Cheez-it commercial?
I always wake up feelin' cheesy coach…
I always wake up feelin' cheesy coach…
JFABNRGR said:
Sips are going to win this and the natty while at the same time confirming how bad our program is.
Thank God for friends and Crown Royal….and its about to be Supercross season.
Nah I actually think Michigan can match up defensively with either of these teams.
JFABNRGR said:
Sips are going to win this and the natty while at the same time confirming how bad our program is.
Thank God for friends and Crown Royal….and its about to be Supercross season.
Sark will never win a NC.
Howdy Dammit said:Aggie Dad Sip said:JohnLA762 said:Aggie Dad Sip said:
The one thing keeping Texas from winning this game is Sark's play calling. As I said yesterday, Texas cannot stop the pass. But Washington can't stop the run. Sark is as stubborn as Jimbo in terms of offensive scheme. Had he just run the ball out of the gate, it would be 21-14 Texas.
Different offensive play calls would have resulted in the same point total but taken 7 off the board for UW?!?
Had Texas run more time off the clock with sustained drives using the running game, yeah. Maybe. It makes me feel better saying it anyway…
Without a muffed punt it's likely 28-7
But don't forget that Texas owns college football. Once the ref payments kick in it's a different ballgame.
(Editor's note - the current penalty count is 6 for 36 yds against Texas vs 1 for 4 yds against Washington. Obviously the conspiracy theory about Texas owning the refs is nonsense)
Aggie Dad Sip said:Howdy Dammit said:Aggie Dad Sip said:JohnLA762 said:Aggie Dad Sip said:
The one thing keeping Texas from winning this game is Sark's play calling. As I said yesterday, Texas cannot stop the pass. But Washington can't stop the run. Sark is as stubborn as Jimbo in terms of offensive scheme. Had he just run the ball out of the gate, it would be 21-14 Texas.
Different offensive play calls would have resulted in the same point total but taken 7 off the board for UW?!?
Had Texas run more time off the clock with sustained drives using the running game, yeah. Maybe. It makes me feel better saying it anyway…
Without a muffed punt it's likely 28-7
But don't forget that Texas owns college football. Once the ref payments kick in it's a different ballgame.
(Editor's note - the current penalty count is 6 for 36 yds against Texas vs 1 for 4 yds against Washington. Obviously the conspiracy theory about Texas owning the refs is nonsense)
Can't argue with that. All calls have been fair so far imo
I hate to be that guy, but catching the punt doesn't guarantee they go score when they are 70 yards from the end zone.Iraq2xVeteran said:
Washington has outgained Texas 305 (255 passing and 50 rushing) total yards to 213 (97 passing and 116 rushing) total yards, but the game is tied at 21 because of a muffed punt and failed 4th down conversion attempt. Otherwise, Washington would have had a 24-14 lead instead of 21-21 tie.
The Porkchop Express said:I hate to be that guy, but catching the punt doesn't guarantee they go score when they are 70 yards from the end zone.Iraq2xVeteran said:
Washington has outgained Texas 305 (255 passing and 50 rushing) total yards to 213 (97 passing and 116 rushing) total yards, but the game is tied at 21 because of a muffed punt and failed 4th down conversion attempt. Otherwise, Washington would have had a 24-14 lead instead of 21-21 tie.
No. But it takes away 7 from the sips. And their drive likely takes enough time that it erases that last minute drive of the half. So at minimum a 14 point play.
I don't know who that sooner dude is but I feel like we could be friends.
The sips will take out their b_ _ t plugs during halftime.
Howdy Dammit said:Aggie Dad Sip said:Howdy Dammit said:Aggie Dad Sip said:JohnLA762 said:Aggie Dad Sip said:
The one thing keeping Texas from winning this game is Sark's play calling. As I said yesterday, Texas cannot stop the pass. But Washington can't stop the run. Sark is as stubborn as Jimbo in terms of offensive scheme. Had he just run the ball out of the gate, it would be 21-14 Texas.
Different offensive play calls would have resulted in the same point total but taken 7 off the board for UW?!?
Had Texas run more time off the clock with sustained drives using the running game, yeah. Maybe. It makes me feel better saying it anyway…
Without a muffed punt it's likely 28-7
But don't forget that Texas owns college football. Once the ref payments kick in it's a different ballgame.
(Editor's note - the current penalty count is 6 for 36 yds against Texas vs 1 for 4 yds against Washington. Obviously the conspiracy theory about Texas owning the refs is nonsense)
Can't argue with that. All calls have been fair so far imo
Well, except for the illegal cut block against a cornerback trying to brace himself from being trucked by an offensive lineman that outweighed him by 100 lbs.
vbl said:
I don't know who that sooner dude is but I feel like we could be friends.
Saw that too
That is a penalty... You can't cut someone's legs out just because you are going to get blocked by them.Aggie Dad Sip said:Howdy Dammit said:Aggie Dad Sip said:Howdy Dammit said:Aggie Dad Sip said:JohnLA762 said:Aggie Dad Sip said:
The one thing keeping Texas from winning this game is Sark's play calling. As I said yesterday, Texas cannot stop the pass. But Washington can't stop the run. Sark is as stubborn as Jimbo in terms of offensive scheme. Had he just run the ball out of the gate, it would be 21-14 Texas.
Different offensive play calls would have resulted in the same point total but taken 7 off the board for UW?!?
Had Texas run more time off the clock with sustained drives using the running game, yeah. Maybe. It makes me feel better saying it anyway…
Without a muffed punt it's likely 28-7
But don't forget that Texas owns college football. Once the ref payments kick in it's a different ballgame.
(Editor's note - the current penalty count is 6 for 36 yds against Texas vs 1 for 4 yds against Washington. Obviously the conspiracy theory about Texas owning the refs is nonsense)
Can't argue with that. All calls have been fair so far imo
Well, except for the illegal cut block against a cornerback trying to brace himself from being trucked by an offensive lineman that outweighed him by 100 lbs.
Regardless how this game shakes out though, I was thoroughly impressed with Michigan today. I really thought Bama would spank them. Neither Texas nor Washington is ready for that team.
Should be a first, no different than what tu did for their first
LETS COOK WASHINGTON!!!
Washington qb was hit on that slide, no flag?
keithfreitag said:
Washington qb was hit on that slide, no flag?
How little football do y'all watch where you don't know the difference?
Seriously
. Exactly, the DB could have just avoided the blockAggies2009 said:That is a penalty... You can't cut someone's legs out just because you are going to get blocked by them.Aggie Dad Sip said:Howdy Dammit said:Aggie Dad Sip said:Howdy Dammit said:Aggie Dad Sip said:JohnLA762 said:Aggie Dad Sip said:
The one thing keeping Texas from winning this game is Sark's play calling. As I said yesterday, Texas cannot stop the pass. But Washington can't stop the run. Sark is as stubborn as Jimbo in terms of offensive scheme. Had he just run the ball out of the gate, it would be 21-14 Texas.
Different offensive play calls would have resulted in the same point total but taken 7 off the board for UW?!?
Had Texas run more time off the clock with sustained drives using the running game, yeah. Maybe. It makes me feel better saying it anyway…
Without a muffed punt it's likely 28-7
But don't forget that Texas owns college football. Once the ref payments kick in it's a different ballgame.
(Editor's note - the current penalty count is 6 for 36 yds against Texas vs 1 for 4 yds against Washington. Obviously the conspiracy theory about Texas owning the refs is nonsense)
Can't argue with that. All calls have been fair so far imo
Well, except for the illegal cut block against a cornerback trying to brace himself from being trucked by an offensive lineman that outweighed him by 100 lbs.
Boom
That was a bullet!
Penix has such a good arm.
That was a strike
Pizza
Joined:
Dec 28, 2022
Posts:
2,890
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BartInLA said:
The sips will take out their b_ _ t plugs during halftime.
We can't say "butt" on here?
Did I just hear Javorskie Lane's name???
J Train with the shoutout!
What a bullet.
LFG WA!!!
Featured Stories
See All
22:08
11h ago
3.3k
Hefner scores 19 as No. 12 A&M overpowers HCU in Friday matinee
by Olin Buchanan
19:59
17h ago
3.3k
Ar'maj Reed-Adams announces his return to Texas A&M for 2025
by Richard Zane
9:12
17h ago
1.2k
Cobra39
Attire for Aggies attending CFB Playoff game in Austin tomorrow
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
30
BurnetAggie99
Attire for Aggies attending CFB Playoff game in Austin tomorrow
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
24
zgolfz85
Attire for Aggies attending CFB Playoff game in Austin tomorrow
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
17
Cyanide15
Attire for Aggies attending CFB Playoff game in Austin tomorrow
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
8
txaggie2012
Attire for Aggies attending CFB Playoff game in Austin tomorrow
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
8