Found this IWC in Vegas this weekend. I was about to go for it but my wife's datejust came in oddly while we were there.
Similar, possibly step up.BroncStomper06 said:
Thanks. I'm really digging several of the Portofino models on the IWC site. I must admit that I'm not as familiar with IWC as a brand. Is it comparable to Omega in terms of quality?
BroncStomper06 said:
Thanks. I'm really digging several of the Portofino models on the IWC site. I must admit that I'm not as familiar with IWC as a brand. Is it comparable to Omega in terms of quality?
Dies Irae said:BroncStomper06 said:
Thanks. I'm really digging several of the Portofino models on the IWC site. I must admit that I'm not as familiar with IWC as a brand. Is it comparable to Omega in terms of quality?
I would say IWC is a step above but I think Omega makes a better watch but has horrible branding
FTAC2011 said:Dies Irae said:BroncStomper06 said:
Thanks. I'm really digging several of the Portofino models on the IWC site. I must admit that I'm not as familiar with IWC as a brand. Is it comparable to Omega in terms of quality?
I would say IWC is a step above but I think Omega makes a better watch but has horrible branding
The iconic moonwatch company has poor branding?
Yes, because they have 3,047 other models, submodels, and "colorways." At some point it's dilution.FTAC2011 said:Dies Irae said:BroncStomper06 said:
Thanks. I'm really digging several of the Portofino models on the IWC site. I must admit that I'm not as familiar with IWC as a brand. Is it comparable to Omega in terms of quality?
I would say IWC is a step above but I think Omega makes a better watch but has horrible branding
The iconic moonwatch company has poor branding?
JSKolache said:Yes, because they have 3,047 other models, submodels, and "colorways." At some point it's dilution.FTAC2011 said:Dies Irae said:BroncStomper06 said:
Thanks. I'm really digging several of the Portofino models on the IWC site. I must admit that I'm not as familiar with IWC as a brand. Is it comparable to Omega in terms of quality?
I would say IWC is a step above but I think Omega makes a better watch but has horrible branding
The iconic moonwatch company has poor branding?
Aesthetically, I like a lot of IWC. But the size is usually too big and they offer (or offered, I haven't checked in a while) a bunch of ETA and Sellita movements.FtBendTxAg said:
I'd say IWC is a step up. Your watch maker would likely be more impressed by a nice IWC opposed to an Omega. Your non watch guy will obviously prefer Omega. Not to take away from Omega. IWC has more high end high complication watches. Kinda like comparing JLC to Rolex. Everyone knows who the better watchmaker is… both have watches that start in the same range, but a vast difference in the high end. Just my
Opinion.
BroncStomper06 said:
Thanks. I'm really digging several of the Portofino models on the IWC site. I must admit that I'm not as familiar with IWC as a brand. Is it comparable to Omega in terms of quality?
Psssh... no more Speedy pics for this guy.YouBet said:JSKolache said:Yes, because they have 3,047 other models, submodels, and "colorways." At some point it's dilution.FTAC2011 said:Dies Irae said:BroncStomper06 said:
Thanks. I'm really digging several of the Portofino models on the IWC site. I must admit that I'm not as familiar with IWC as a brand. Is it comparable to Omega in terms of quality?
I would say IWC is a step above but I think Omega makes a better watch but has horrible branding
The iconic moonwatch company has poor branding?
Almost bought one 10 years ago instead of my Milgauss. Still like them a lot but to your point I see guys on this thread quite frequently throw out the 3081.42 (or whatever the hell it is) Moonwatch version and it just makes me look past it.
It's confusing and it shouldn't be.
yessir!nealan said:
does the gold run through the center of the clasp?
Farmer1906 said:
I'd wear one.