KidDoc said:
I'm not involved with the mass vaccine program but my understanding is that we did not get as many allocated as other areas because we did not have the system in place to get them into arms. As we use more and more then they will allocate more I believe.
https://www.texastribune.org/2021/01/20/texas-coronavirus-vaccine-data/From the Texas Tribune article (Jan 20):
Quote:
As the state began the massive undertaking of distributing the coronavirus vaccine, its early rollout was beset by data problems that left state officials with immunization and dose information that was outdated, incomplete and sometimes misleading.
Health care providers feared those inaccurate numbers, collected by the state's immunization registry, ImmTrac2, and another system were being used by the state to decide who would get the weekly allotment of vaccine and by others to decide who would get blamed for moving too slowly as a desperate public clamored for shots.
Health officials say the registry data were not used to dole out vaccines in the early weeks of the rollout that's a misconception, they said but added that the data they're collecting with ImmTrac2 could soon become a central factor in how many vaccine doses Texas gets from the federal government going forward.
In the first six weeks of the vaccine rollout, the federal government allocated doses based largely on population, but will likely start using the vaccination rate how fast doses are going into arms as "at least a piece of their allocation process," said Lara Anton, a spokesperson for the Texas Department of State Health Services, which runs the registry.
Quote:
"We haven't been using the data that's in ImmTrac for allocation, but it sounds like we are going to need to place greater emphasis on that," Anton said. "Because if they think we're not using up all of their vaccines, they're not going to send us additional vaccine. You know, they'll send it somewhere else that's using more."
From everything I've found, the "use it or lose it" scenario was "feared" and talked about, but never a factor in the allocation. Officially it's based on an
"expert panel". Looking around the state, it appeared some hot spots with a higher ratios of cases and deaths per capita were targeted. But I can't say I can prove it.
Shot providers have been out of vaccine since this thing started.
I'm sure there's isolated stories, but by and large it's been frustration from rationing and politics.
The US administered 74 million flu shots last September, and nobody noticed. The flu vaccine was ready on the shelves. Yes, these are stored differently, but 20 million doses in the first 4 weeks shouldn't have been that big of a deal.
I think national distribution to states are now most closely related to 1A & 1B populations. And similar Texas to counties. The big "hubs" are making it harder to make sense of county numbers, since they serve multiple counties.
The article said, tracking was a huge issue.
As a hospital system administrator told my wife, "We need more vaccine. And it needs to be predictable".
Rationing.