It is unknown because they don't give enough detail to get specific data. The 3 numbers they give add up to 99.9 and not 100%. Plus my number is the delta from yesterday, so it's effectively impacted by 2 days of slight rounding issues due to only 0.1% detail.theNetSmith said:
Under comm/trvl/cluster, you have 75/1/1, but 80 new cases. Does that mean 3 are unknown?
Thanks for picking me up here. I was over on the basketball forum busting Caruso's decision making.cavscout96 said:
agrab is late.... so....
why, again, are we hyperventilating over .36% active cases?
TAMC11 said:
Has it already been explained on here how the number of hospitalizations can go down while the occupancy percentage goes up? Seems to defy logic.
AgCPA said:
Im not convinced this is a novel virus. One has to consider the fact that this is statistically non existent in kids, very mild in young adults and half of those testing positive are not sick that our bodies have some sort of immunity... It must in many cases recognize the virus to mount an attack... perhaps because its so similar to colds... maybe.. just musing anyway... thoughts?
Oogway said:
What would it take to convince you?
It would have to be worse than the flu.Oogway said:
What would it take to convince you?
Oogway said:
What would it take to convince you?
Have you looked at lockett's spreadsheet? 7.5% of the new cases reported yesterday were under the age of 15 (6% of total cases), 17.5% under the age of 20 (12% of total cases).. where do you draw the line for "statistically insignificant"?AgCPA said:
One has to consider the fact that this is statistically non existent in kids...
Quote:
A study to help determine the rate of novel coronavirus infection in children and their family members in the United States has begun enrolling participants. The study, called Human Epidemiology and Response to SARS-CoV-2 (HEROS), also will help determine what percentage of children infected with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, develop symptoms of the disease. In addition, the HEROS study will examine whether rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection differ between children who have asthma or other allergic conditions and children who do not. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health, is sponsoring and funding the HEROS study.
Lastly, that they are studying family groups is hopefully going to be informative:Quote:
"One interesting feature of this novel coronavirus pandemic is that very few children have become sick with COVID-19 compared to adults," said NIAID Director Anthony S. Fauci, M.D. "Is this because children are resistant to infection with SARS-CoV-2, or because they are infected but do not develop symptoms? The HEROS study will help us begin to answer these and other key questions."
Quote:
The HEROS study team will rapidly enroll 6,000 people from 2,000 U.S. families already participating in NIH-funded pediatric research studies in 11 cities. Study participants will include both healthy children and children with asthma or other allergic conditions. The study team will prospectively follow these children and their families for six months to determine who gets infected with SARS-CoV-2, whether the virus is transmitted to other family members, and which family members with the virus develop COVID-19.
And how many were from the drive through testing event, two weeks ago, and were tested without any symptoms? How many, if any, ever showed symptoms?theNetSmith said:Have you looked at lockett's spreadsheet? 7.5% of the new cases reported yesterday were under the age of 15 (6% of total cases), 17.5% under the age of 20 (12% of total cases).. where do you draw the line for "statistically insignificant"?AgCPA said:
One has to consider the fact that this is statistically non existent in kids...
Interesting on the pie chart how >15 is 6% and 15-19 is 9.2%. It's possibly a typo, but it would be a really bad sign if someone doesn't know the difference between greater than and less than.Rapier108 said:
49 New Cases
224 New Tests Reported
1 New Death (Woman in her 70s who was hospitalized)
Below 20 in the hospital, occupancy rates dropped slightly, ICU up slightly
77801 +5
77802 +2
77803 +17
77807 +6
77808 +3
77840 +3
77845 +13
http://brazoshealth.org/sites/default/files/inline-files/7.23.20.pdf
Edit: Updated the info on the person who died.
yes.theNetSmith said:
I was responding to the claim that it is statistically non-existent in kids, not that the number of child deaths or symptomatic child cases is statistically small.
Related question: Has there been anything published to the effect of "children under the age of X do not go through a contagious phase and cannot transmit the coronavirus to others"? Honest question.
It's an error. First appeared on 7-19 and no one has fixed it.pants said:Interesting on the pie chart how >15 is 6% and 15-19 is 9.2%. It's possibly a typo, but it would be a really bad sign if someone doesn't know the difference between greater than and less than.Rapier108 said:
49 New Cases
224 New Tests Reported
1 New Death (Woman in her 70s who was hospitalized)
Below 20 in the hospital, occupancy rates dropped slightly, ICU up slightly
77801 +5
77802 +2
77803 +17
77807 +6
77808 +3
77840 +3
77845 +13
http://brazoshealth.org/sites/default/files/inline-files/7.23.20.pdf
Edit: Updated the info on the person who died.
