There was a lot of chaos in France today

57,273 Views | 753 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by fullback44
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texagbeliever said:

annie88 said:

texagbeliever said:

A day that ends in Y and another anti women post by infinity ag.


I'm a woman and he's not wrong. Liberal white women are the worst people. They usually push racist ideas, thinking blacks can't get ID and such, empathize with basically terrorists and horrible people for the most part occasion you'll get some empathy for the right people and then they blame the right.

So you dont think you should vote. Or did you not read the whole tweet quoted by that poster.

Following the "logic" i opposed, it would be much easier to say only evangelical Christians should vote since they voted republican at a +30% rate. That is also not the basis of a good republic.

I am fine with it. Or keep it to landowners
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AGC said:

texagbeliever said:

AGC said:

texagbeliever said:

Sharpshooter said:

texagbeliever said:

A day that ends in Y and another anti women post by infinity ag.

He's right, you know.

No he is not right. Women's suffrage did not destroy the west. The rise of postmodernism destroyed the west. If he is right how would you reconcile that married Christian women vote more conservative then unmarried non Christian men. Thanks.

Postmodern impact:
First it weakend Christian churches. Which led to a precipitous drop in Christian schooling. I hope i dont need to explain why public school is worse.
Second it gave rise to "liberation": sexual, abortion, divorce. Destruction of family.
Third it pushed people away from family and into a rat race for money and education. With that people were left to jsut be materialistic.
Fourth the hollow life absent of family and community impacts women more quickly which leads to them voting more liberal. True for unmarried and non-christian women.

So yes I think one who blames women is just showing their ignorance on voting behavior and what is actually at play.


What? Leaders of the suffrage movement were pagans and participated in the demonic. It was always going to end this way, even before postmodernism.

How do you defend this take when it is obvious that being Christian and being married are much stronger voting tendency indicators then biological sex in the current electorate? So women voting is not some demon inspired thing. It might be crazy for you, but there are biblical female leaders. Like Jael for example.


We're downstream of suffrage (and the spiritualists who started it) and feminism (in all its waves). You can't disaggregate them and say it's all critical theory. Things started by people who talk to demons lead to bad places, no matter whether you agree with suffrage or not.

Please tell me why women are lesser people in society and dont deserve a right to vote. Thanks in advance.

Also it is a very bad stance to take because bad people did X then X must be bad. It is like saying a racist supports Trump therefore anything Trump does is bad. It is a very weak form of logical argument.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
samurai_science said:

texagbeliever said:

annie88 said:

texagbeliever said:

A day that ends in Y and another anti women post by infinity ag.


I'm a woman and he's not wrong. Liberal white women are the worst people. They usually push racist ideas, thinking blacks can't get ID and such, empathize with basically terrorists and horrible people for the most part occasion you'll get some empathy for the right people and then they blame the right.

So you dont think you should vote. Or did you not read the whole tweet quoted by that poster.

Following the "logic" i opposed, it would be much easier to say only evangelical Christians should vote since they voted republican at a +30% rate. That is also not the basis of a good republic.

I am fine with it. Or keep it to landowners

Tell me where being a landowner makes one more of a US citizen then one who doesnt own land. Who deserves a vote, an active duty soldier who doesnt own land or a 30 year old who was gifted land by rich parents?
Pichael Thompson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Still paying a landlord ehh?
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JFABNRGR said:

There is a high probability some of this is being influenced by putin, who would benefit if all or even some of europe is in chaos. It would heavily degrade their support for Ukraine and in the future make some of these countries ripe for his plundering. NATO is already weak and will further weaken with crap like this.

We can laugh all we want saying they asked for this but in reality this is not good for the USA.


Counter argument:
Putin didnt allow all of the immigrants in.
Putin isnt making the media call it a "school riot"
NATO is already falling apart and euro leaders are looking to ditch.
carl spacklers hat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texagbeliever said:

samurai_science said:

texagbeliever said:

annie88 said:

texagbeliever said:

A day that ends in Y and another anti women post by infinity ag.


I'm a woman and he's not wrong. Liberal white women are the worst people. They usually push racist ideas, thinking blacks can't get ID and such, empathize with basically terrorists and horrible people for the most part occasion you'll get some empathy for the right people and then they blame the right.

So you dont think you should vote. Or did you not read the whole tweet quoted by that poster.

Following the "logic" i opposed, it would be much easier to say only evangelical Christians should vote since they voted republican at a +30% rate. That is also not the basis of a good republic.

I am fine with it. Or keep it to landowners

Tell me where being a landowner makes one more of a US citizen then one who doesnt own land. Who deserves a vote, an active duty soldier who doesnt own land or a 30 year old who was gifted land by rich parents?

Its not about one being more American than the other. It is about one being a responsible voter, someone with skin in the game, versus someone who is on the take. There are hordes of people who shouldn't vote but simply because they were born here they are granted the right. The notion might come across as radical but it actually makes a lot of sense.
People think I'm an idiot or something, because all I do is cut lawns for a living.
Bulldog73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
carl spacklers hat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's a decent start but they need to be doing that in all the urban enclaves. They know where most of these "mostly peaceful protesters" came from. Time to start cracking skulls in their own neighborhoods.
People think I'm an idiot or something, because all I do is cut lawns for a living.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They need to do that about 800,000 more times. They have a long way to go.
Mas89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If those cops had some baseball bats and went for knees and collar bones, those punks would be crawling out of that alley and not running. They must start doing better.
CascadiaAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bulldog73 said:



that makes me so happy. but they need to be swinging harder, using more arm and hitting them with much more force.

you only teach feral animals through force.
SanAntoneAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Foam padded billy clubs courtesy of the French police?
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mathguy64 said:

They need to do that about 800,000 more times. They have a long way to go.

They need to put a bullet into each one. Thats the only way this works.
Iraq2xVeteran
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The chaos and anarchy in France are the consequence of liberal French leaders allowing mass immigration of people, who are hell bent on destroying western civilization.
Thunderstruck xx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dear France, this is how you do it:


deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
infinity ag said:

deddog said:

oldyeller said:

infinity ag said:

Trump is using this issue in his speeches.

"If you don't vote R, USA will become France"


Of course he is. Fear is a powerful motivator, and he is adept at peddling fear to rile up the base.

LOL
Most of his base is itching for the Commies and Muslims to try this in Suburban American neighborhoods.


I wouldn't be so sure.
Frisco is being invaded in a different way and mosques all over Texas. His base is overrated as far as fighting back.

Yes, its a "soft" invasion, the boiling of the frog.
I do think an overt invasion where the religion of peace starts attacking neighborhoods (which is the norm in tribal 3rd world countries - plus France and Spain) doesn't happen in the US, and no one is afraid of that happening either.
Pichael Thompson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
God I love seeing these scum get their teeth kicked


Bout ****ing time
aggiedata
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can you imagine

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I would guess this was covered already in detail here but it is the funniest meme on the internet today:

From a post in dutch;
Quote:

What we know:
1. She is a member of the French left-wing party and an activist, one of the biggest champions of opening up migration to North African peoples.

2. She owns a small chic boutique in a chic location; she stood in her shop in an attempt to save it from looting and theft, and told them that she is a famous activist.

3. She told them: I am so-and-so, the activist for asylum, I stand on your side, I have defended you and your access and stay in France; they spat on her, knocked her down, and kicked her with their feetthankfully, she is still alive.

4. And they looted the entire shop, and in an instant she lost her lifelong struggle and work. She stood there stunned, unable to believe that these thieving, inciting, criminal, barbaric hordes are the ones she has defended her whole life, and for whom she has advocated to invade and destroy her country.


LOL.
Jack Ruby
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy."

Bulldog73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

I would guess this was covered already in detail here but it is the funniest meme on the internet today:

From a post in dutch;
Quote:

What we know:
1. She is a member of the French left-wing party and an activist, one of the biggest champions of opening up migration to North African peoples.

2. She owns a small chic boutique in a chic location; she stood in her shop in an attempt to save it from looting and theft, and told them that she is a famous activist.

3. She told them: I am so-and-so, the activist for asylum, I stand on your side, I have defended you and your access and stay in France; they spat on her, knocked her down, and kicked her with their feetthankfully, she is still alive.

4. And they looted the entire shop, and in an instant she lost her lifelong struggle and work. She stood there stunned, unable to believe that these thieving, inciting, criminal, barbaric hordes are the ones she has defended her whole life, and for whom she has advocated to invade and destroy her country.


LOL.

So why is she holding a preprinted sign in English amongst a bunch of other preprinted signs in English?
BQ78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Because it is AI

h


texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sumlins Cesspool Cleaner said:

texagbeliever said:

A day that ends in Y and another anti women post by infinity ag.


Women are really good at short term nurturing needs. Feeding, clothing, emotional support, healing etc.

Men are better at long term planning, hunting, chopping enough firewood for winter, planting, building projects etc.

When only men voted political policies were geared towards long term visions. Since women began voting political policies shifted to term emotional based reactions. it's not that all women vote poorly. It's that political policies have been geared towards short term "nurturing" polices devoid of longterm effects to garner and entice women votes.

Please explain how Christian women vote more republican then any other male + religious affiliation outside of Christian and Mormon.

Further I dont look at the political direction of any of the muslim countries where only men can vote and think gee their long term plan is fantastic.

Last, men who don't desire kids absolutely don't think long term they just think selfishly. It just so happens that capitalism is generally a better environment for them to be selfish then a socialist one if they are remotely skilled.

Seriously look at these exit polls and tell me how this is a women problem for voting outcome. https://www.cnn.com/election/2024/exit-polls/national-results/general/president/5

Other fun fact is how non college white men voted way more heavily for trump then college educated white men. So maybe Texags posters shouldn't vote since they are demographically in a less republican statistical group?
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annie88 said:

texagbeliever said:

A day that ends in Y and another anti women post by infinity ag.


I'm a woman and he's not wrong. Liberal white women are the worst people. They usually push racist ideas, thinking blacks can't get ID and such, empathize with basically terrorists and horrible people for the most part occasion you'll get some empathy for the right people and then they blame the right.


Thank you Annie.
It may be hard to do so in real life because of the repercussions, but at least on here we all should try to be honest and not politically correct.

I appreciate your response.
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sumlins Cesspool Cleaner said:

texagbeliever said:

A day that ends in Y and another anti women post by infinity ag.


Women are really good at short term nurturing needs. Feeding, clothing, emotional support, healing etc.

Men are better at long term planning, hunting, chopping enough firewood for winter, planting, building projects etc.

When only men voted political policies were geared towards long term visions. Since women began voting political policies shifted to term emotional based reactions. it's not that all women vote poorly. It's that political policies have been geared towards short term "nurturing" polices devoid of longterm effects to garner and entice women votes.


Better posts than this one have rarely been posted on TA.

I see this even in my own household. I plan for kid's college expenses, retirement etc. The wife watches what we eat, makes us all kinds of healthy concoctions, nags me to go to the gym, all that.

Women's tendency to nurture and to uplift are good for society and children but bad for security and protection. This is the crux of this issue. We have put women in charge of areas they are not naturally suited for. Because we assume that male and female can replace each other.

The weird problem today is there are many feminized men who managed to get power, examples are Macron of France, the British PMs, Justin Trudeau, Obama/Biden... they are more in touch with their feminine side so can connect better "as women" at some level so they get the female vote.
FriendlyAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texagbeliever said:

Sumlins Cesspool Cleaner said:

texagbeliever said:

A day that ends in Y and another anti women post by infinity ag.


Women are really good at short term nurturing needs. Feeding, clothing, emotional support, healing etc.

Men are better at long term planning, hunting, chopping enough firewood for winter, planting, building projects etc.

When only men voted political policies were geared towards long term visions. Since women began voting political policies shifted to term emotional based reactions. it's not that all women vote poorly. It's that political policies have been geared towards short term "nurturing" polices devoid of longterm effects to garner and entice women votes.

Please explain how Christian women vote more republican then any other male + religious affiliation outside of Christian and Mormon.

Further I dont look at the political direction of any of the muslim countries where only men can vote and think gee their long term plan is fantastic.

Last, men who don't desire kids absolutely don't think long term they just think selfishly. It just so happens that capitalism is generally a better environment for them to be selfish then a socialist one if they are remotely skilled.


One Louder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
infinity ag said:

Sumlins Cesspool Cleaner said:

texagbeliever said:

A day that ends in Y and another anti women post by infinity ag.


Women are really good at short term nurturing needs. Feeding, clothing, emotional support, healing etc.

Men are better at long term planning, hunting, chopping enough firewood for winter, planting, building projects etc.

When only men voted political policies were geared towards long term visions. Since women began voting political policies shifted to term emotional based reactions. it's not that all women vote poorly. It's that political policies have been geared towards short term "nurturing" polices devoid of longterm effects to garner and entice women votes.


Better posts than this one have rarely been posted on TA.

Women's tendency to nurture and to uplift are good for society and children but bad for security and protection. This is the crux of this issue. We have put women in charge of areas they are not naturally suited for.

The weird problem today is there are many feminized men who managed to get power, example is Macron of France, the British PMs, Justin Trudeau, Obama/Biden.


Young women are no longer marrying, having children, or following Christ, so they have no meaning to their lives. They are misplacing their empathy and nurturing in "the immigrant," "the underprivileged", and the "underrepresented" with no thought to the long-term consequences. That's the difference.
Highway6
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

I would guess this was covered already in detail here but it is the funniest meme on the internet today:

From a post in dutch;
Quote:

What we know:
1. She is a member of the French left-wing party and an activist, one of the biggest champions of opening up migration to North African peoples.

2. She owns a small chic boutique in a chic location; she stood in her shop in an attempt to save it from looting and theft, and told them that she is a famous activist.

3. She told them: I am so-and-so, the activist for asylum, I stand on your side, I have defended you and your access and stay in France; they spat on her, knocked her down, and kicked her with their feetthankfully, she is still alive.

4. And they looted the entire shop, and in an instant she lost her lifelong struggle and work. She stood there stunned, unable to believe that these thieving, inciting, criminal, barbaric hordes are the ones she has defended her whole life, and for whom she has advocated to invade and destroy her country.


LOL.

Proof positive that liberalism is a mental disorder
Sumlins Cesspool Cleaner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My original post on this topic wasn't women are bad voters vs men being better voters. It was that political policies morph to garner votes. Before women had the right to vote political policies were long term visions. Now it's about immediacy. Politicians don't present longterm strategies because that doesn't get women to vote. Show a crying mom at the border and the women turn out.

I think the reason you see Christian married women vote that way is because they have Christian husbands leading their families.

Islam longterm planning is coming to fruition in this thread with France. They have multi generational plans to conquer the west being manifested. It's working. While obviously we don't want their plan to succeed we can see the results of it's effectiveness in France.

Vs what? I hate long term strategies does Europe have? Import immigrants and print fiat money? Can you name anything more short sighted.

American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oldyeller said:


You get that support for an unchecked executive is a shift to the right, correct? That study looked at roll call votes over time. Accept it. Don't. Whatever helps you sleep at night.

Your definitions are really something else.

The right wing is not despotism. It is individual liberty opposed on the left by collectivism. That is the contemporary American spectrum.
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One Louder said:

infinity ag said:

Sumlins Cesspool Cleaner said:

texagbeliever said:

A day that ends in Y and another anti women post by infinity ag.


Women are really good at short term nurturing needs. Feeding, clothing, emotional support, healing etc.

Men are better at long term planning, hunting, chopping enough firewood for winter, planting, building projects etc.

When only men voted political policies were geared towards long term visions. Since women began voting political policies shifted to term emotional based reactions. it's not that all women vote poorly. It's that political policies have been geared towards short term "nurturing" polices devoid of longterm effects to garner and entice women votes.


Better posts than this one have rarely been posted on TA.

Women's tendency to nurture and to uplift are good for society and children but bad for security and protection. This is the crux of this issue. We have put women in charge of areas they are not naturally suited for.

The weird problem today is there are many feminized men who managed to get power, example is Macron of France, the British PMs, Justin Trudeau, Obama/Biden.


Young women are no longer marrying, having children, or following Christ, so they have no meaning to their lives. They are misplacing their empathy and nurturing in "the immigrant," "the underprivileged", and the "underrepresented" with no thought to the long-term consequences. That's the difference.


Very good points.
We all need a mission or a goal in life. If the top goal for young women becomes "become a C level exec" or "make a lot of money" instead of anything to do with a family (husband/children) then it is very unhealthy in the long term. It does seem like a good choice in the short term when one is young. After 40, if a woman is still single with a career (that may lay her off at any time), all the money and title amounts to nothing. This is more or less the same for men as well.

I believe, as you say above, they have transferred their nurturing instincts on migrants instead of their own children. I would probably do the same if I had no 2 sweet brats of my own.. or maybe transferred it to a pet.

There is no thought given to long term consequences as it is the headache for men to deal with.

I can't change the world but I can try to influence my newly adult daughter that true happiness is with a family with children. Career is good too, but it is secondary.
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sumlins Cesspool Cleaner said:

My original post on this topic wasn't women are bad voters vs men being better voters. It was that political policies morph to garner votes. Before women had the right to vote political policies were long term visions. Now it's about immediacy. Politicians don't present longterm strategies because that doesn't get women to vote. Show a crying mom at the border and the women turn out.

I think the reason you see Christian married women vote that way is because they have Christian husbands leading their families.

Islam longterm planning is coming to fruition in this thread with France. They have multi generational plans to conquer the west being manifested. It's working. While obviously we don't want their plan to succeed we can see the results of it's effectiveness in France.

Vs what? I hate long term strategies does Europe have? Import immigrants and print fiat money? Can you name anything more short sighted.




No further comment needed.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sumlins Cesspool Cleaner said:

My original post on this topic wasn't women are bad voters vs men being better voters. It was that political policies morph to garner votes. Before women had the right to vote political policies were long term visions. Now it's about immediacy. Politicians don't present longterm strategies because that doesn't get women to vote. Show a crying mom at the border and the women turn out.

I think the reason you see Christian married women vote that way is because they have Christian husbands leading their families.

Islam longterm planning is coming to fruition in this thread with France. They have multi generational plans to conquer the west being manifested. It's working. While obviously we don't want their plan to succeed we can see the results of it's effectiveness in France.

Vs what? I hate long term strategies does Europe have? Import immigrants and print fiat money? Can you name anything more short sighted.



Okay that is a slightly different perspective then what I replied to. Apologies of sorts as it is hard to tease out full perspectives from a post or two.

I personally think people have shorter attention spans because of the rise of materialism and short term dopamine driven entertainment movement. A person who lacks discipline and the ability to abstain from a treat now for a better outcome in the future is going to act that way in most aspects of life.

So you will see a rise in obesity, betting, suicide, sexual promiscuity, divorce, agnosticism, and materialism. Now all of that i argue is easily observable. Now apply that same societal dynamic to politics and of course you see that as a society the tradeoff is more heavily favored to short term dopamine.

Now lets think about this in terms of voting behavior by city type. Rural areas vote insanely red. People in a rural setting have a slower pace of life and less instant gratification. The opposite is Urban environment. Where lights, activities, and the next big thing is on schedule for tomorrow. Also has the highest democrat vote. Urban areas dominate state outcomes, except for Texas. Illinois, Oregon, Washington, Arizona, Georgia, etc wouldnt ever vote blue if it weren't for the major cities.

Not convinced look at age. Millenials and Gen Z voted overwhelmingly democrat. Guess who have some of the shortest attention spans. Those generations (in part because of their age). Meanwhile older more settled adults like Gen X vote Red. Which of those groups do you think can delay a treat now for 2 treats in the future?

All of that is to say women are not the boogeyman they are made out to be. And I think many people should guard their hearts against a desire to blame a group as the source of their trouble. That usually doesnt have healthy outcomes...

Now the meat of the question why does it matter if it is actually a society problem and not just a women voting behavior problem? Because if your solution doesnt address the root problem you are merely putting a band aide on a mortal wound! Which is what has happened in Europe. I remember traveling in France around Easter. Me and friends left Paris to go see Normandy. Everything in the small town was closed. A French woman was like yeah everything is closed this is a catholic area. So Paris and the major urban areas are much like Chicago in Illinois or Portland in Oregon. It dominates the politics. Dont let your entire view of a country be shaped by 3 tweets and a meme.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dp
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.