in before "would stuff ballot box."
There was a lot of chaos in France today
75,269 Views |
812 Replies |
Last: 3 days ago by UTExan
AGC said:texagbeliever said:Sharpshooter said:texagbeliever said:
A day that ends in Y and another anti women post by infinity ag.
He's right, you know.
No he is not right. Women's suffrage did not destroy the west. The rise of postmodernism destroyed the west. If he is right how would you reconcile that married Christian women vote more conservative then unmarried non Christian men. Thanks.
Postmodern impact:
First it weakend Christian churches. Which led to a precipitous drop in Christian schooling. I hope i dont need to explain why public school is worse.
Second it gave rise to "liberation": sexual, abortion, divorce. Destruction of family.
Third it pushed people away from family and into a rat race for money and education. With that people were left to jsut be materialistic.
Fourth the hollow life absent of family and community impacts women more quickly which leads to them voting more liberal. True for unmarried and non-christian women.
So yes I think one who blames women is just showing their ignorance on voting behavior and what is actually at play.
What? Leaders of the suffrage movement were pagans and participated in the demonic. It was always going to end this way, even before postmodernism.
How do you defend this take when it is obvious that being Christian and being married are much stronger voting tendency indicators then biological sex in the current electorate? So women voting is not some demon inspired thing. It might be crazy for you, but there are biblical female leaders. Like Jael for example.
First ever NFL game in Paris is potentially problematic. NFL is concerned...
Cesspool represent!!
Funky Winkerbean said:
It's really sad watching a government sit on its hands and do nothing.
Not really.
This *is* government. They pander to the mob that will get them elected.
An L of an Ag said:
First ever NFL game in Paris is potentially problematic. NFL is concerned...
The Steelers released this hype video for week 7.
— Football Crave (@FootballCravee) October 19, 2026
The Steelers face the Saints in Paris. pic.twitter.com/lGWoa1Wgul
99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% certain this is fake.
but just in case it is not.....
maverick2076 said:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1E1QdLUX2i/?mibextid=wwXIfr
no part of that that try-hards unfunny spiel addressed the ACTUAL issue of the imported 3rd world dreck pillaging in the name of their pedo-prophet.
while a few points were cute, he is just burying his head in teh sand as much as the others are.
POV: you play for Steelers and you’re inside the bus going to the stadium, in Paris. pic.twitter.com/pVdemTlQyB
— Yo ᶜᴬᴹ (@YohanAndrade10) October 19, 2026
stay low boys. keep those feet moving. go be perfect.
- chavez (fnl)
oldyeller said:YouBet said:oldyeller said:YouBet said:schmellba99 said:oldyeller said:YouBet said:oldyeller said:YouBet said:oldyeller said:Sumlins Cesspool Cleaner said:
The system was designed for local residents to represent geographical areas on a national level. What we have is a system where national groups (left and right) pick local agents to represent either party on a national level. It's operating backwards and hence the mess.
The fact that we have huge national parties is a major part of the problem. It siloes views into monoliths that don't adequately account for regional differences, and feeds tribalistic attitudes that impede meaningful progress on issues of substance.
Said this elsewhere this week...would you prefer a system more like Europe where there are multiple parties leading to "grand coalitions" that frequently fail?
And all have led to much more left-wing outcomes than what we have here with the UK and France on the verge of financial failure because of it.
I'm not suggesting that a parliamentarian system of multiple small parties is any better, but in theory factions within parties would lead to modifying their national platforms akin to the agreements that are the basis of these sorts of coalitions so there would be something more agreeable to people generally. What we have now isn't working and has led to both sides characterizing the other side as evil, idiotic, insert-negative-term-of-choice-here, etc.
These tendencies, along with the influence of big money, are serious issues. Not sure if there is a solution, but we should at least be clear that there is a problem in need of addressing.
I acknowledge some problems with our current system, but a parliamentarian system has already proven to be inferior simply by watching Western Europe who pursued diversity and lax to open borders immigration policy like we have. And very little of what they have done is agreeable to our version of conservative here so it would still fail. So, your theory, while valid, has not played out that way.
I would say the larger problem with our current system is that the Democrats have sprinted so far to the left that there is very little we can agree on anymore. [Political spectrum meme here] It didn't used to be that way when both parties wanted what was best for the country within the confines of the US Constitution.
Fair, and one could add that Republicans have equally shifted heavily to the right where what would have once been considered a mainline Republican is now chastised as being a "RINO."
Both sides have shifted to the extremes, and that isn't helping because it undermines people talking to each other rather than at each other. The caricatures lead to dismissal, and we are all the worse for it.
Gone are the days when Reagan and O'Neill would vigorously debate policy during the day, and be able to share a drink that same evening.
Incorrect.
Republicans have shifted left, but not nearly as far left nor as fast as the democrats have. It makes the gap seem wider than it really is. But the overall shift has been left and not right.
I think if you compared the beliefs of each party now versus, say even 50 years ago, you'll find that the extremes is applicable almost exclusively to the left. The right is "extreme" in that it holds onto some really, really weird beliefs like guys shouldn't pretend to be girls, law enforcement should do its job, taxes and government spending are out of control (the national republican party excluded from this one), etc.
Hell, we only have to go back to the 1990s to find where Democrats would now be Republicans. We have video evidence from speeches of it. See both Clintons, Biden, Schumer...almost any Democrat at the time.
There is zero debate here on this topic. Republicans have not moved to the right...at all.
Studies suggest otherwise:Quote:
As Democrats have grown more liberal over time and Republicans much more conservative, the "middle" where moderate-to-liberal Republicans could sometimes find common ground with moderate-to-conservative Democrats on contentious issues has vanished.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/03/10/the-polarization-in-todays-congress-has-roots-that-go-back-decades/
That is such laughably obvious b.s. that I can't believe it was published. Good lord.
A simple eyeball test of historical reality debunks this "study".
Again, where have the Republican moved "heavily to the right"? The Democrats literally ran on an open borders policy last time out which is anti-American and anti-sovereignty. Thus, shreds the Constitution. That one issue alone debunks this worthless study.
You get that support for an unchecked executive is a shift to the right, correct? That study looked at roll call votes over time. Accept it. Don't. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
Dude, I'm not the one literally denying reality. I sleep just fine.
I don't GAS about roll call votes. Irrelevant against the reality of open borders, gender bending surgery for minors, welfare for illegals, wanting/letting illegals vote in elections, wealth taxes, anti-white racism. Can go on and on.
Did you read link to other thread I posted above? How do you square that far left wing policy reality with your mythical move to the hard right by Republicans? We simply can't co-exist in this country anymore when the left believes in fantasy and things that don't exist.
And what unchecked executive stuff are you talking about? Also a myth. Trump does EO's just like every other POTUS has ever done. If Congress wasn't so inept then maybe there would be fewer EO's.
Quote:
strip him naked, continue beating his ass, then send him on his way.
or send him to meet the fishes.
whatever works.
I guess they got the job done, but... I have to say I've seen manlier beatdowns. How did it take them so long to get the stick away from him when he was already down on the pavement? He's got a head - kick it until he lets go. Curb stomp his wrists would do the same. And when you had the stick then give him a taste of what he was planning to dish out.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Trump is using this issue in his speeches.
"If you don't vote R, USA will become France"
"If you don't vote R, USA will become France"
infinity ag said:
Trump is using this issue in his speeches.
"If you don't vote R, USA will become France"
And he's not wrong. At all.
Democrats have already said they are bringing open borders back if/when they win.
oldyeller said:
You get that support for an unchecked executive is a shift to the right, correct? That study looked at roll call votes over time. Accept it. Don't. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
Soviet Union. China. North Korea. Cuba. Venezuela. Nicaragua. All unchecked executives. All right wing?
There is a high probability some of this is being influenced by putin, who would benefit if all or even some of europe is in chaos. It would heavily degrade their support for Ukraine and in the future make some of these countries ripe for his plundering. NATO is already weak and will further weaken with crap like this.
We can laugh all we want saying they asked for this but in reality this is not good for the USA.
We can laugh all we want saying they asked for this but in reality this is not good for the USA.
“You can resolve to live your life with integrity. Let your credo be this: Let the lie come into the world, let it even triumph. But not through me.”
- Alexander Solzhenitsyn
- Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Bulldog73 said:oldyeller said:
You get that support for an unchecked executive is a shift to the right, correct? That study looked at roll call votes over time. Accept it. Don't. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
Soviet Union. China. North Korea. Cuba. Venezuela. Nicaragua. All unchecked executives. All right wing?
Cambodia....now the UK who jails people for saying stuff online while letting rapists and murderers off the hook.
Theft under the cover of a protest is what I see. Same as always.
JFABNRGR said:
There is a high probability some of this is being influenced by putin, who would benefit if all or even some of europe is in chaos. It would heavily degrade their support for Ukraine and in the future make some of these countries ripe for his plundering. NATO is already weak and will further weaken with crap like this.
We can laugh all we want saying they asked for this but in reality this is not good for the USA.
This is funny. The progressives in France SUPPORT THIS. Blaming Putin is a nice BlueAnon theory though.
This is the progressive shop owner after her shop was destroyed. She later said she supports the rioters. LOL
I wonder how Aaron Rodgers feels about the Steelers traveling to Paris to play an NFL game this weekend. I'd like to get his candid thoughts.
Just like leftists here supported the riots in 2020 and they support Soros DAs letting criminals loose. They hate our country and want to destroy it. They hate western civilization and want to destroy it.samurai_science said:
This is funny. The progressives in France SUPPORT THIS. Blaming Putin is a nice BlueAnon theory though.
didn't realize the NFL was playing a game over there on Sunday
W said:
didn't realize the NFL was playing a game over there on Sunday
Yes they are. I wonder if the jihadis will have a special welcome.
samurai_science said:
This is the progressive shop owner after her shop was destroyed. She later said she supports the rioters. LOL
Every lefty in the western world. This is almost all US Democrats right now.
samurai_science said:JFABNRGR said:
There is a high probability some of this is being influenced by putin, who would benefit if all or even some of europe is in chaos. It would heavily degrade their support for Ukraine and in the future make some of these countries ripe for his plundering. NATO is already weak and will further weaken with crap like this.
We can laugh all we want saying they asked for this but in reality this is not good for the USA.
This is funny. The progressives in France SUPPORT THIS. Blaming Putin is a nice BlueAnon theory though.
Ok smart guy explain why both can't be true at the same time?
“You can resolve to live your life with integrity. Let your credo be this: Let the lie come into the world, let it even triumph. But not through me.”
- Alexander Solzhenitsyn
- Alexander Solzhenitsyn
texagbeliever said:AGC said:texagbeliever said:Sharpshooter said:texagbeliever said:
A day that ends in Y and another anti women post by infinity ag.
He's right, you know.
No he is not right. Women's suffrage did not destroy the west. The rise of postmodernism destroyed the west. If he is right how would you reconcile that married Christian women vote more conservative then unmarried non Christian men. Thanks.
Postmodern impact:
First it weakend Christian churches. Which led to a precipitous drop in Christian schooling. I hope i dont need to explain why public school is worse.
Second it gave rise to "liberation": sexual, abortion, divorce. Destruction of family.
Third it pushed people away from family and into a rat race for money and education. With that people were left to jsut be materialistic.
Fourth the hollow life absent of family and community impacts women more quickly which leads to them voting more liberal. True for unmarried and non-christian women.
So yes I think one who blames women is just showing their ignorance on voting behavior and what is actually at play.
What? Leaders of the suffrage movement were pagans and participated in the demonic. It was always going to end this way, even before postmodernism.
How do you defend this take when it is obvious that being Christian and being married are much stronger voting tendency indicators then biological sex in the current electorate? So women voting is not some demon inspired thing. It might be crazy for you, but there are biblical female leaders. Like Jael for example.
We're downstream of suffrage (and the spiritualists who started it) and feminism (in all its waves). You can't disaggregate them and say it's all critical theory. Things started by people who talk to demons lead to bad places, no matter whether you agree with suffrage or not.
texagbeliever said:
A day that ends in Y and another anti women post by infinity ag.
I'm a woman and he's not wrong. Liberal white women are the worst people. They usually push racist ideas, thinking blacks can't get ID and such, empathize with basically terrorists and horrible people for the most part occasion you'll get some empathy for the right people and then they blame the right.
Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
FFS. Lying about who is really doing this.
🇫🇷 Chers visiteurs, en raison d’un mouvement social étudiant, le musée est fermé pour le moment. Nous vous prions de nous excuser de la gêne occasionnée.
— Musée du Louvre (@MuseeLouvre) October 19, 2026
🌍Dear visitors, due to student strikes the museum is currently closed. We apologise for the inconvenience. pic.twitter.com/tNKFk3B9aj
Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
BillysCesspoolMaintainer
Joined:
Nov 10, 2007
Posts:
11,584
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Today was not a good day for my son's AP Art History teacher to send out an email advertising a summer student trip to France and Italy.
infinity ag said:
Trump is using this issue in his speeches.
"If you don't vote R, USA will become France"
Of course he is. Fear is a powerful motivator, and he is adept at peddling fear to rile up the base.
oldyeller said:infinity ag said:
Trump is using this issue in his speeches.
"If you don't vote R, USA will become France"
Of course he is. Fear is a powerful motivator, and he is adept at peddling fear to rile up the base.
LOL
Most of his base is itching for the Commies and Muslims to try this in Suburban American neighborhoods.
infinity ag said:
Trump is using this issue in his speeches.
"If you don't vote R, USA will become France"
Can you provide some proof of where he is wrong?
Look at states with high levels of imported Somalis & Muslims...
Look at the states with flash mob looting problems...
Look at the bat **** crazy states (CA, NY, OR, WA)...
Look at the cities with high crime and failing public education...
Democrats all around.
Your turn, which conservative states and conservative cities show signs of this European-Islamist behavior?
deddog said:oldyeller said:infinity ag said:
Trump is using this issue in his speeches.
"If you don't vote R, USA will become France"
Of course he is. Fear is a powerful motivator, and he is adept at peddling fear to rile up the base.
LOL
Most of his base is itching for the Commies and Muslims to try this in Suburban American neighborhoods.
I wouldn't be so sure.
Frisco is being invaded in a different way and mosques all over Texas. His base is overrated as far as fighting back.
HalifaxAg said:infinity ag said:
Trump is using this issue in his speeches.
"If you don't vote R, USA will become France"
Can you provide some proof of where he is wrong?
Look at states with high levels of imported Somalis & Muslims...
Look at the states with flash mob looting problems...
Look at the bat **** crazy states (CA, NY, OR, WA)...
Look at the cities with high crime and failing public education...
Democrats all around.
Your turn, which conservative states and conservative cities show signs of this European-Islamist behavior?
What the hell are you talking about?
When did I say that he was wrong? I just made an observation.
annie88 said:texagbeliever said:
A day that ends in Y and another anti women post by infinity ag.
I'm a woman and he's not wrong. Liberal white women are the worst people. They usually push racist ideas, thinking blacks can't get ID and such, empathize with basically terrorists and horrible people for the most part occasion you'll get some empathy for the right people and then they blame the right.
So you dont think you should vote. Or did you not read the whole tweet quoted by that poster.
Following the "logic" i opposed, it would be much easier to say only evangelical Christians should vote since they voted republican at a +30% rate. That is also not the basis of a good republic.
Featured Stories
See All
4:17
1h ago
834
16:10
13h ago
3.2k
Haggerty's 22 instrumental in A&M's deceptively lopsided victory
by Olin Buchanan
Next month provides ample opportunities for recruiting stability
by Jason Howell
Lightning-quick Edwards provides a glimmer of light for the future
by Olin Buchanan
5 Thoughts: Texas A&M 97, Alabama State 66
by Luke Evangelist