Paxton vs Talarico

158,143 Views | 1668 Replies | Last: 3 hrs ago by Noctilucent
BusterAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to K2-HMFIC • 7:24a, 6/16/26
AG
K2-HMFIC said:
SHSU-AG said:
K2-HMFIC said:
DG-Ag said:
K2-HMFIC said:
txags92 said:
K2-HMFIC said:
Who?mikejones! said:
K2-HMFIC said:
Who?mikejones! said:
Sure. You could abstain. Then you for sure will get what you absolutely don't want.

Again, you've got 2 choices and one is clearly, by a long amount, more likely to produce the results I want. The other is 1000% likely to produce the results i don't want.

So, abstain all you want. Its stupid and self defeating. If you want tceh to ruin your day twice, go for it


Better to abstain, wait six years to get the right person in office than elect Paxton and have him in office in perpetuity.


That's what the primary was for. Paxton won and now is your choice if you prefer anl candidate more oriented towards the right.

It's that or real disaster

Given the nature of party primaries its difficult to get someone out once they get in.

I mean the success rate is atrocious.

We are better of losing...and making up for it now than have the stain of Ken Paxton perpetually hanging over us.

You keep saying "we". Are you talking about the democrats? Because sure, voting in Talarico is surely better for them. There is no planet on which 6 years of Talarico in the senate representing Texas is better for the Rs.


I'll take 6 years of Talarico over 24 of Ken Paxton.

Good luck with that, comrade!



Folks aren't focused enough on the long game…we need to get the Republican Party right, and if we tolerate corruption, then we will become that.


If you would take Talafreako for six years, you are no Republican!



Voted Republican in every election since I was 18.

Won't support abject corruption.

I think there's something more to being an American than voting your party every single time regardless of outcome.

I want a strong Republican Party, and if Talafreako needs to be elected, so Paxton never runs again…so be it.

What did Paxton do that was more corrupt than anything that Biden, Obama, Clinton, Clinton, or Pelosi did?

Last I checked, Jesus Christ wasn't on the ballot.
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
Reply Quote
19
BusterAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to K2-HMFIC • 7:25a, 6/16/26
AG
K2-HMFIC said:
Who?mikejones! said:
K2-HMFIC said:
Who?mikejones! said:
Sure. You could abstain. Then you for sure will get what you absolutely don't want.

Again, you've got 2 choices and one is clearly, by a long amount, more likely to produce the results I want. The other is 1000% likely to produce the results i don't want.

So, abstain all you want. Its stupid and self defeating. If you want tceh to ruin your day twice, go for it


Better to abstain, wait six years to get the right person in office than elect Paxton and have him in office in perpetuity.


That's what the primary was for. Paxton won and now is your choice if you prefer anl candidate more oriented towards the right.

It's that or real disaster

Given the nature of party primaries its difficult to get someone out once they get in.

I mean the success rate is atrocious.

We are better of losing...and making up for it now than have the stain of Ken Paxton perpetually hanging over us.

So you are completely OK with blacks not voting until they get reparations, right?
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
Reply Quote
6
Reload8098
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BMX Bandit • 8:01a, 6/16/26
AG
BMX Bandit said:
Not sure what "pro trans" means but if it means girls in sports and child sex changes, then no way in hell. It even 12 years ago.

But if "pro trans" means equal "rights" like can't fire them, etc then yes. Dan Morales probably would have been all for that had it been an issue of the day.

Either way, not following how no one can come out of a primary.

Simply pushing this trans BS, children mutilating themselves would have never had any legs and pushing an idea like that would have been the end of the candidate. Instead of calling it what it is and letting these confused people get psychiatric help, the left is indulging their mental illness, creating a platform. If a grown adult wants to ruin their life, have at it, but leave the children alone. Sick sobs.

The left has lost their fcking minds and they keep pushing increasing the level of violence, it won't end well for them.
Reply Quote
11
1 edit
HtownAg92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Science Denier • 8:12a, 6/16/26
AG
Science Denier said:
Quote:
Yet, the very effective Paxton defense attorney Dan Cogdell endorses Talarico.

Lawyers are mostly democrats.

Just thought I'd point that out to you.

Whoa whoa whoa...

Criminal Defense and Plaintiffs' lawyers are mostly democrats. Leave the rest of us out of it.
Reply Quote
6
K2-HMFIC
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BusterAg • 8:16a, 6/16/26
BusterAg said:
K2-HMFIC said:
Who?mikejones! said:
K2-HMFIC said:
Who?mikejones! said:
Sure. You could abstain. Then you for sure will get what you absolutely don't want.

Again, you've got 2 choices and one is clearly, by a long amount, more likely to produce the results I want. The other is 1000% likely to produce the results i don't want.

So, abstain all you want. Its stupid and self defeating. If you want tceh to ruin your day twice, go for it


Better to abstain, wait six years to get the right person in office than elect Paxton and have him in office in perpetuity.


That's what the primary was for. Paxton won and now is your choice if you prefer anl candidate more oriented towards the right.

It's that or real disaster

Given the nature of party primaries its difficult to get someone out once they get in.

I mean the success rate is atrocious.

We are better of losing...and making up for it now than have the stain of Ken Paxton perpetually hanging over us.

So you are completely OK with blacks not voting until they get reparations, right?

My dude...wtf does that have to do w/anything I said?
Reply Quote
BusterAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to K2-HMFIC • 8:32a, 6/16/26
AG
K2-HMFIC said:
BusterAg said:
K2-HMFIC said:
Who?mikejones! said:
K2-HMFIC said:
Who?mikejones! said:
Sure. You could abstain. Then you for sure will get what you absolutely don't want.

Again, you've got 2 choices and one is clearly, by a long amount, more likely to produce the results I want. The other is 1000% likely to produce the results i don't want.

So, abstain all you want. Its stupid and self defeating. If you want tceh to ruin your day twice, go for it


Better to abstain, wait six years to get the right person in office than elect Paxton and have him in office in perpetuity.


That's what the primary was for. Paxton won and now is your choice if you prefer anl candidate more oriented towards the right.

It's that or real disaster

Given the nature of party primaries its difficult to get someone out once they get in.

I mean the success rate is atrocious.

We are better of losing...and making up for it now than have the stain of Ken Paxton perpetually hanging over us.

So you are completely OK with blacks not voting until they get reparations, right?

My dude...wtf does that have to do w/anything I said?

Same perverse reasoning, IMO.
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
Reply Quote
2
Science Denier
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to HtownAg92 • 8:49a, 6/16/26
AG
HtownAg92 said:
Science Denier said:
Quote:
Yet, the very effective Paxton defense attorney Dan Cogdell endorses Talarico.

Lawyers are mostly democrats.

Just thought I'd point that out to you.

Whoa whoa whoa...

Criminal Defense and Plaintiffs' lawyers are mostly democrats. Leave the rest of us out of it.

Here is a very long and boring article on The Political Ideologies of American Lawyers

Very long and boring. Feel free to read it. I'm not. However, here is a graph in this article.



I stand by my word "most".
LOL OLD
Reply Quote
1
K2-HMFIC
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BusterAg • 8:51a, 6/16/26
BusterAg said:
K2-HMFIC said:
BusterAg said:
K2-HMFIC said:
Who?mikejones! said:
K2-HMFIC said:
Who?mikejones! said:
Sure. You could abstain. Then you for sure will get what you absolutely don't want.

Again, you've got 2 choices and one is clearly, by a long amount, more likely to produce the results I want. The other is 1000% likely to produce the results i don't want.

So, abstain all you want. Its stupid and self defeating. If you want tceh to ruin your day twice, go for it


Better to abstain, wait six years to get the right person in office than elect Paxton and have him in office in perpetuity.


That's what the primary was for. Paxton won and now is your choice if you prefer anl candidate more oriented towards the right.

It's that or real disaster

Given the nature of party primaries its difficult to get someone out once they get in.

I mean the success rate is atrocious.

We are better of losing...and making up for it now than have the stain of Ken Paxton perpetually hanging over us.

So you are completely OK with blacks not voting until they get reparations, right?

My dude...wtf does that have to do w/anything I said?

Same perverse reasoning, IMO.



We need to work on your logic Good Sir…the conclusions you are using are weakly supported and fail under pressure.


Very sad.
Reply Quote
1
BusterAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to K2-HMFIC • 9:38a, 6/16/26
AG
K2-HMFIC said:
BusterAg said:
K2-HMFIC said:
BusterAg said:
K2-HMFIC said:
Who?mikejones! said:
K2-HMFIC said:
Who?mikejones! said:
Sure. You could abstain. Then you for sure will get what you absolutely don't want.

Again, you've got 2 choices and one is clearly, by a long amount, more likely to produce the results I want. The other is 1000% likely to produce the results i don't want.

So, abstain all you want. Its stupid and self defeating. If you want tceh to ruin your day twice, go for it


Better to abstain, wait six years to get the right person in office than elect Paxton and have him in office in perpetuity.


That's what the primary was for. Paxton won and now is your choice if you prefer anl candidate more oriented towards the right.

It's that or real disaster

Given the nature of party primaries its difficult to get someone out once they get in.

I mean the success rate is atrocious.

We are better of losing...and making up for it now than have the stain of Ken Paxton perpetually hanging over us.

So you are completely OK with blacks not voting until they get reparations, right?

My dude...wtf does that have to do w/anything I said?

Same perverse reasoning, IMO.



We need to work on your logic Good Sir…the conclusions you are using are weakly supported and fail under pressure.


Very sad.

Well, that's just your opinion man.

I think that voting for the other side because you can't get what you want, especially by voting against a suspected fraud with very weak allegations of fraud for an even bigger, way easier to prove fraud, is pretty close to black people not voting if they don't get reparations.

It's self-defeating stupidity.
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
Reply Quote
9
Danny Vermin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:44a, 6/16/26
Talarico is a kid diddler without a doubt. How anyone can vote for him is beyond me.
#FJB
Reply Quote
12
HtownAg92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Science Denier • 10:10a, 6/16/26
AG
Science Denier said:
HtownAg92 said:
Science Denier said:
Quote:
Yet, the very effective Paxton defense attorney Dan Cogdell endorses Talarico.

Lawyers are mostly democrats.

Just thought I'd point that out to you.

Whoa whoa whoa...

Criminal Defense and Plaintiffs' lawyers are mostly democrats. Leave the rest of us out of it.

Here is a very long and boring article on The Political Ideologies of American Lawyers

Very long and boring. Feel free to read it. I'm not. However, here is a graph in this article.



I stand by my word "most".

I stand by my generalization too:



I will also say this. Those that lean far left seem to forget all basic concepts of law, such as evidence and logic, and will blindly follow MSM talking-points and BS. It has been an interesting (and disturbing) phenomenon to see people I know with law degrees go batsheet, woke crazy the past few years.
Reply Quote
11
Whoop2
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Reload8098 • 3:34p, 6/16/26
I heard that many are push toward trans during their most vulnerable age and I heard people say others pushed them towards that, including teachers who would call them by a name opposite their gender. Some of the people pushed into this regret that they let themselves be bulldozed. I've heard a story of it happening in Washington and mom found out before it was too late and picked up and moved to Texas. If an adult want to do that, that's their business and they need to pay ( not Medicaid or the military) but children do not understand that this is life altering. And they can't really go back to normal once you change, for one thing it sterilizes them). Someone I know well says, " but they are depressed and suicidal, so they need to do the change and my argument is this is a mental health issue. If you are that depressed you need to seek help for depression. Not go for : the well I'm depressed so cut off my sex organs or boobs. Many are suicidal after surgery and making the switch. And Talarico just loves trans kids, ew is he a pedo!?
Reply Quote
10
Reload8098
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Whoop2 • 4:39p, 6/16/26
AG
Well stated.

I "AI'd" the topic:

  • Suicidal Ideation: According to the Trevor Project's National Survey, approximately 46% to 50% of transgender and non-binary youth seriously considered attempting suicide within the past year. [1, 2]
  • Suicide Attempts: Studies indicate that roughly 30% of transgender adolescents report having attempted suicide at least once in their lives. [1, 2]
  • Clinical Screenings: In hospital emergency settings, up to 78% of transgender and gender-diverse youth screen positive for elevated suicide risk. [1]
  • Anyone pushing a child into this is evil.
    • Reply Quote
    8
    coolerguy12
    User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to BMX Bandit • 5:28p, 6/16/26
    AG
    BMX Bandit said:
    Not sure what "pro trans" means but if it means girls in sports and child sex changes, then no way in hell. It even 12 years ago.

    But if "pro trans" means equal "rights" like can't fire them, etc then yes. Victor (edited to fix) Morales probably would have been all for that had it been an issue of the day.

    Either way, not following how no one can come out of a primary.


    100% should be allowed to fire they/them if they want to push their delusion on others. No way people should be expected to use pronouns that don't even make sense grammatically. If they want to play dress up on the weekend and live in reality at the office then whatever, more power to them, but a company shouldn't be expected to bow down to their delusions.
    Reply Quote
    11
    txags92
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to coolerguy12 • 5:33p, 6/16/26
    AG
    coolerguy12 said:
    BMX Bandit said:
    Not sure what "pro trans" means but if it means girls in sports and child sex changes, then no way in hell. It even 12 years ago.

    But if "pro trans" means equal "rights" like can't fire them, etc then yes. Victor (edited to fix) Morales probably would have been all for that had it been an issue of the day.

    Either way, not following how no one can come out of a primary.


    100% should be allowed to fire they/them if they want to push their delusion on others. No way people should be expected to use pronouns that don't even make sense grammatically. If they want to play dress up on the weekend and live in reality at the office then whatever, more power to them, but a company shouldn't be expected to bow down to their delusions.

    That has always been the problem I have with the whole trans rights issue. By declaring themselves to be something they are not, then demanding that everybody else participate in their delusion, they are trampling my right to acknowledge the reality that I see before my eyes. I don't wish them any ill will, and if they want to dress up and pretend, fine, let them. But demanding that I suddenly call Larry from accounting Laura (even though "she" still looks like a Larry to me) after working with "him" for 20 years, under the penalty of losing my job if I don't, where are my rights in that equation?
    Reply Quote
    28
    txwxman
    User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to Danny Vermin • 10:53p, 6/16/26
    Danny Vermin said:
    Talarico is a kid diddler without a doubt. How anyone can vote for him is beyond me.

    Talarico should've gotten a solid 6 who's seen better days like Paxton did. Instead low T got a 20 something Latina hottie. What's wrong with the dude? I'm telling ya something just ain't right!
    Reply Quote
    2
    Ag with kids
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to txwxman • 11:11p, 6/16/26
    AG
    txwxman said:
    Danny Vermin said:
    Talarico is a kid diddler without a doubt. How anyone can vote for him is beyond me.

    Talarico should've gotten a solid 6 who's seen better days like Paxton did. Instead low T got a 20 something Latina hottie. What's wrong with the dude? I'm telling ya something just ain't right!

    Of course he's got a 20 something Latina hottie.


    That's what the campaign hired to play as his "girlfriend".

    Why would they get a solid 6 that wouldn't get him extra votes from LIV...

    Y'all know who y'all are...
    You can turn off signatures, btw
    Reply Quote
    4
    Teslag
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to txwxman • 11:15p, 6/16/26
    AG
    txwxman said:
    Danny Vermin said:
    Talarico is a kid diddler without a doubt. How anyone can vote for him is beyond me.

    Talarico should've gotten a solid 6 who's seen better days like Paxton did. Instead low T got a 20 something Latina hottie. What's wrong with the dude? I'm telling ya something just ain't right!


    Beard. She's a beard.
    Reply Quote
    14
    agent-maroon
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    5:51a, 6/17/26
    AG
    Su nombre es "Maria La Barba"
    No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
    Reply Quote
    3
    oh no
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    8:17a, 6/17/26
    AG
    Telricco tells a journalist he has a longtime girlfriend who is his best friend and soulmate. His campaign then produced a photo of him with a subordinate campaign staffer from a few years ago. Liberal mind hive celebrates and rejoices that their low T freak has a "20 something Latina hottie".
    Reply Quote
    15
    1 edit
    Serious Lee
    User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    8:27a, 6/17/26
    it certainly does reek of harry sisson paying for instathots w/ photo ops for more street cred
    Reply Quote
    3
    Prosperdick
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    10:25a, 6/17/26
    AG
    Reply Quote
    11
    Teslag
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to Prosperdick • 10:34a, 6/17/26
    AG
    And we are supposed to believe this ****ing loser has an attractive young girlfriend?
    Reply Quote
    22
    Ag87H2O
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to Prosperdick • 10:39a, 6/17/26
    AG
    So we have this hard left wing manchild, whose mom still puts money in his checking acccount, that has no wife or kids, no experience at anything but politics, ideology, and theory that wants to be on of two Senators that represent the State of Texas.

    Only Democrats could nominate someone this lame. Even with his faults, in a sane world Paxton would beat this guy, and I use the term loosely, by 20+ points.

    "Well, doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?" "A republic, if you can keep it" - Benjamin Franklin
    Reply Quote
    22
    Prosperdick
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to Ag87H2O • 10:43a, 6/17/26
    AG
    Ag87H2O said:
    So we have this hard left wing manchild, whose mom still puts money in his checking acccount, that has no wife or kids, no experience at anything but politics, ideology, and theory that wants to be on of two Senators that represent the State of Texas.

    Only Democrats could nominate someone this lame. Even with his faults, in a sane world Paxton would beat this guy, and I use the term loosely, by 20+ points.


    True but the blue no matter who cult will at least keep him from losing that badly. I still think the freak loses by 10 points.
    Reply Quote
    13
    HtownAg92
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to Prosperdick • 11:39a, 6/17/26
    AG
    Prosperdick said:
    Ag87H2O said:
    So we have this hard left wing manchild, whose mom still puts money in his checking acccount, that has no wife or kids, no experience at anything but politics, ideology, and theory that wants to be on of two Senators that represent the State of Texas.

    Only Democrats could nominate someone this lame. Even with his faults, in a sane world Paxton would beat this guy, and I use the term loosely, by 20+ points.


    True but the blue no matter who cult will at least keep him from losing that badly. I still think the freak loses by 10 points.

    Texas Dim Party Meeting:
    Leader 1: How about we put up a true Texan, you know, like an outdoorsman, rancher-type tough guy family man who epitomizes what it means to be a Texan.

    Rest of the Group: Who let this guy in? GET OUT.

    Leader 2: How about a pasty iffeminate soy-boy who hates meat, loves open-borders and trans issues and epitomizes the opposite of Texan family values?

    Group: PERFECT! That's the kind of candidate that Texans identify with and will vote for.

    Reply Quote
    11
    Prosperdick
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to HtownAg92 • 11:46a, 6/17/26
    AG
    HtownAg92 said:
    Prosperdick said:
    Ag87H2O said:
    So we have this hard left wing manchild, whose mom still puts money in his checking acccount, that has no wife or kids, no experience at anything but politics, ideology, and theory that wants to be on of two Senators that represent the State of Texas.

    Only Democrats could nominate someone this lame. Even with his faults, in a sane world Paxton would beat this guy, and I use the term loosely, by 20+ points.


    True but the blue no matter who cult will at least keep him from losing that badly. I still think the freak loses by 10 points.

    Texas Dim Party Meeting:
    Leader 1: How about we put up a true Texan, you know, like an outdoorsman, rancher-type tough guy family man who epitomizes what it means to be a Texan.

    Rest of the Group: Who let this guy in? GET OUT.

    Leader 2: How about a pasty iffeminate soy-boy who hates meat, loves open-borders and trans issues and epitomizes the opposite of Texan family values?

    Group: PERFECT! That's the kind of candidate that Texans identify with and will vote for.


    I'm just glad they're not wising up on how to "turn Texas blue."

    Please keep running freaks Dems, that strategy is bound to payoff at some point, right?
    Reply Quote
    9
    txwxman
    User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    4:01p, 6/17/26
    Poor Paxton is left wondering why the Republican Party didn't pay a young hottie to be his girlfriend. Instead Paxton is left with a retread.
    Reply Quote
    Teslag
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to txwxman • 4:35p, 6/17/26
    AG
    txwxman said:
    Poor Paxton is left wondering why the Republican Party didn't pay a young hottie to be his girlfriend. Instead Paxton is left with a retread.


    Probably because Paxton doesn't have prove he's not an HIV+ homo for starters.
    Reply Quote
    21
    4
    User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to txwxman • 4:50p, 6/17/26
    AG
    txwxman said:
    Poor Paxton is left wondering why the Republican Party didn't pay a young hottie to be his girlfriend. Instead Paxton is left with a retread.

    Assuming you are supporting Talarico.

    Which of his political stances do you agree with?
    Reply Quote
    7
    oh no
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to 4 • 4:52p, 6/17/26
    AG
    4 said:
    txwxman said:
    Poor Paxton is left wondering why the Republican Party didn't pay a young hottie to be his girlfriend. Instead Paxton is left with a retread.

    Assuming you are supporting Talarico.

    Which of his political stances do you agree with?

    wxman definitely supports the trans kids like talrico.
    Reply Quote
    12
    Tone2002
    User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to Teslag • 6:19p, 6/17/26
    Teslag said:
    txwxman said:
    Poor Paxton is left wondering why the Republican Party didn't pay a young hottie to be his girlfriend. Instead Paxton is left with a retread.


    Probably because Paxton doesn't have prove he's not an HIV+ homo for starters.


    yikes. Pinktoe vs pinktoe violence.
    Reply Quote
    1
    Old McDonald
    User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to BusterAg • 7:39p, 6/17/26
    BusterAg said:
    K2-HMFIC said:
    SHSU-AG said:
    K2-HMFIC said:
    DG-Ag said:
    K2-HMFIC said:
    txags92 said:
    K2-HMFIC said:
    Who?mikejones! said:
    K2-HMFIC said:
    Who?mikejones! said:
    Sure. You could abstain. Then you for sure will get what you absolutely don't want.

    Again, you've got 2 choices and one is clearly, by a long amount, more likely to produce the results I want. The other is 1000% likely to produce the results i don't want.

    So, abstain all you want. Its stupid and self defeating. If you want tceh to ruin your day twice, go for it


    Better to abstain, wait six years to get the right person in office than elect Paxton and have him in office in perpetuity.


    That's what the primary was for. Paxton won and now is your choice if you prefer anl candidate more oriented towards the right.

    It's that or real disaster

    Given the nature of party primaries its difficult to get someone out once they get in.

    I mean the success rate is atrocious.

    We are better of losing...and making up for it now than have the stain of Ken Paxton perpetually hanging over us.

    You keep saying "we". Are you talking about the democrats? Because sure, voting in Talarico is surely better for them. There is no planet on which 6 years of Talarico in the senate representing Texas is better for the Rs.


    I'll take 6 years of Talarico over 24 of Ken Paxton.

    Good luck with that, comrade!



    Folks aren't focused enough on the long game…we need to get the Republican Party right, and if we tolerate corruption, then we will become that.


    If you would take Talafreako for six years, you are no Republican!



    Voted Republican in every election since I was 18.

    Won't support abject corruption.

    I think there's something more to being an American than voting your party every single time regardless of outcome.

    I want a strong Republican Party, and if Talafreako needs to be elected, so Paxton never runs again…so be it.

    What did Paxton do that was more corrupt than anything that Biden, Obama, Clinton, Clinton, or Pelosi did?

    Last I checked, Jesus Christ wasn't on the ballot.
    how much time do you have?
    Reply Quote
    Tea Party
    User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to Old McDonald • 7:51p, 6/17/26
    The floor is yours. Use all the time you need.
    Learn about the Texas Nationalist Movement
    https://tnm.me
    Reply Quote
    15
    Ellis Wyatt
    User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to txwxman • 8:09p, 6/17/26
    txwxman said:
    Poor Paxton is left wondering why the Republican Party didn't pay a young hottie to be his girlfriend. Instead Paxton is left with a retread.
    This is hilarious.
    Reply Quote
    2
     
    ×
    subscribe Verify your student status
    See Subscription Benefits
    Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.