TexasAggie73 said:pagerman @ work said:JJxvi said:
This incident makes it seem like it would be a good idea for national security to have a ballroom at a secure location with advanced security features and where like, a would-be assassin hotel guest thats already in the building, can't crash the party or something like that.
So the president (of any ilk) should be holed up in a fortress, hermetically sealed from any threat or danger?
Maybe we should add a moat, populated with alligators, or maybe sharks with lasers, and sniper towers to take out any potential threat, like anyone that doesn't like him, or dares utter statements in opposition to His will?
The president (any president) has to go out in public. You take reasonable precautions for security that balances the need to keep the president safe with the requirements of a free society and then you do the best you can, which it seems like is what happened at this event. Security stopped this person from getting anywhere near the president. Mission accomplished.
If the definition of a "secure" event is one that is so locked down that no one would even consider attempting anything, then you are living in a fantasy world with a police state fetish.
Next thing he will want is a 18 hole golf course in the White House for security, not one of those simulated ones.
Or maybe a basketball court...
Oh wait...been there done that...
You can turn off signatures, btw