***Iran [Military Action Thread]***[See Staff Note in OP]

2,977,253 Views | 13774 Replies | Last: 7 hrs ago by Bulldog73
74Ag1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
[This thread is for discussion of the ongoing military conflict, and by extension, cease-fire activities and negotiations. Take the political commentary, jokes, and memes to other threads. Timeouts incoming for those who insist on derailing this thread -- Staff]
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Still no confirmation of drone attacks/hits on our warships?
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texas12&0 said:

Bulldog73 said:



Apparently a 5" gun took out the engine room. Not so small arm.

Ceasefire? Ceasefire!??? We don't need no stinkin' ceasefire! Let's roll.

In adversarial nations, opinions about the US are formed based on our "failures". Beirut in 82/83? , Afghanistan, Iraq. The IRGC is believing their own and MSM propaganda. There is no doubt in my mind, that they think they are winning the war, Trump is a weak fool, and Iran holds all the cards. Its why this war is going to continue until they reach the FO part of FAFO.

I'm hoping moderate Iranian army elements provide intelligence to Mossad and the US so we can wipe out the IRGC
ErnestEndeavor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No. Iran said they fired drones. Just like they did many times at the start of the war.
ErnestEndeavor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ErnestEndeavor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

I would disagree that they have always projected a unified message.

I avoid temptation unless I can’t resist it.
ErnestEndeavor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Before the war? Yes. Lock step.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ErnestEndeavor said:

Nothing reported. Not the first time they have claimed this.

I wouldn't take anything that says "Iran says" with any kind of seriousness.

We know their regime are all lying sacks of *****
I avoid temptation unless I can’t resist it.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ErnestEndeavor said:

Before the war? Yes. Lock step.

I disagree to a point. I think it was all whatever the supreme leader said, and the others had no choice in the matter. I wouldn't call that unified. I'd call that reacting out of fear and going along so you won't be killed.

It depends on what your definition of is, is.
I avoid temptation unless I can’t resist it.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Honestly, most of these countries just need to get together and have a good old 'kick the bully's ass at recess' kind of fight against Iran. Just bloody them to a pulp in every way, both literally and figuratively.

And I truly don't give a ****ing rats ass what the Iran leadership has to say about anything. I don't trust a ******* thing they have to say.
I avoid temptation unless I can’t resist it.
Ducks4brkfast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ErnestEndeavor said:




It's closed? And we're clearing mines?
ErnestEndeavor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Ex Officio Director
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annie88 said:

Honestly, most of these countries just need to get together and have a good old 'kick the bully's ass at recess' kind of fight against Iran. Just bloody them to a pulp in every way, both literally and figuratively.

And I truly don't give a ****ing rats ass what the Iran leadership has to say about anything. I don't trust a ******* thing they have to say.

Carpet bomb every square inch of Iran and if one person says anything other than sorry please forgive us. Carpet bomb them again and again. That's the message you send to a group that screams death to your country.
Can't decide if I want to be cute & cuddly, or go blow some sh*t up.
Decisions decisions.
sts7049
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ErnestEndeavor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ErnestEndeavor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ErnestEndeavor
How long do you want to ignore this user?




ErnestEndeavor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ErnestEndeavor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So, apparently we seized a container ship that tried to break the blockade:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/20/first-thing-us-military-seizes-iran-ship-strait-of-hormuz-blockade

I like that we didn't back down, and won't allow Iranian vessels through with only a hint of potential peace negotiations. Sorry Iran, this POTUS isn't a pushover that can be controlled by the media.

If this turns into a good ole' fashion siege, where we just cut off all of Iran's money and way to make money, I predict it won't be more than a month before Iran's government starves to death.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
last 36 hours from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps:

"there is no more blockade of the Straits"

"there is a blockade of the Straits"

"we won't attend negotiations in Pakistan"


"we will attend negotiations in Pakistan"

but to idiot leftists, it is America that lost and the USA that is lying.
Bayou City
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's Not an oil tanker
"I've lived through some terrible things in my life, some of which have actually happened."

Mark Twain
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bayou City said:

That's Not an oil tanker

Thanks.
Agador Spartacus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A lot more action in the strait than we have been seeing.

gougler08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nobody is really traversing the Strait though, everyone still just crowded around both sides for entry/exit
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ErnestEndeavor said:



Not sure why we are pursuing them. They've lost.

The proposal would be much more effective if it were delivered by a MOAB
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4 said:

ErnestEndeavor said:



Not sure why we are pursuing them. They've lost.

The proposal would be much more effective if it were delivered by a MOAB

Agree with this. We should be proposing nothing. We should tell them how it's gonna be.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We 're negotiating because they still have what we want. The strait. The uranium.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06 said:

We 're negotiating because they still have what we want. The strait. The uranium.

Well good luck to them trying to put that uranium back together and using that strait they can't get through (that's vital to their economy)
gougler08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06 said:

We 're negotiating because they still have what we want. The strait. The uranium.

And we need an offramp that isn't destroy their entire civilization
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What is considered dual use?
BlackGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMCane said:

last 36 hours from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps:

"there is no more blockade of the Straits"

"there is a blockade of the Straits"

"we won't attend negotiations in Pakistan"


"we will attend negotiations in Pakistan"

but to idiot leftists, it is America that lost and the USA that is lying.


Don't think anyone denies we BTHO Iran kinetically, but that's not the full story and it didn't end the war. They clearly have some leverage (economically) or else we wouldn't be frantically trying to reach an agreement with them to get the straight back open.
Dave Robicheaux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

What is considered dual use?




I don't know how accurate it is as I doubt we would do a full inspection until after ship is at port
Pizza
How long do you want to ignore this user?
By Jonathan Saul

LONDON, April 20 (Reuters) - The Iranian-flagged container ship Touska, which was boarded and seized by U.S. forces on Sunday, is likely to have what Washington deems dual-use items that could be used by the military onboard, maritime security sources said on Monday.

https://www.internazionale.it/ultime-notizie-reuters/2026/04/20/seized-iranian-ship-likely-carrying-equipment-deemed-dual-use-by-us-sources?hl=en-US#:~:text=By%20Jonathan%20Saul,security%20sources%20said%20on%20Monday.

Is Likely =/= "Was"

It's difficult to cut through the insane amount of BS being reported anymore, but it is likely. The ship is reported to have a history of transporting such items.

Late March 2026: The vessel was reported loading cargo at the Chinese ports of Shanghai, Taicang, and Macau/Gaolan.

April 11-12, 2026: The ship made its final major stop at Port Klang, Malaysia, before beginning its transit across the Indian Ocean toward the Persian Gulf.

April 19, 2026: The vessel was intercepted by the USS Spruance while transiting the North Arabian Sea at roughly 17 knots.
First Page Last Page
Page 211 of 395
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.