Gaetz nominated for AG

74,583 Views | 1152 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Brunner88
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Did the hookers bring the minor?

Reads to me like they saw there there.

Quote:

An attorney representing two women who testified before the House Ethics Committee told ABC News in an interview that former Rep. Matt Gaetz paid both his adult clients for sex.

Florida attorney Joel Leppard told ABC News' Juju Chang that one of his clients also witnessed Gaetz having sex with a third woman -- who was then 17 years old -- at a house party in Florida.

"She testified [that] in July of 2017, at this house party, she was walking out to the pool area, and she looked to her right, and she saw Rep. Gaetz having sex with her friend, who was 17," Leppard said.


I'm Gipper
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FireAg said:

Then show us the Venmo transaction…


I'm guessing it'll be in the report once it comes out? I'm assuming he wasn't dumb enough to put "underage hookers" in the subject line though.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FireAg said:

Then show us the Venmo transaction…


They were allegedly shown to the committee. Do you think all of the testimony should be released?


Quote:

Just to be clear, both of your clients testified that they were paid by Rep. Gaetz to have sex?" Chang asked Leppard.

"That's correct. The House was very clear about that and went through each. They essentially put the Venmo payments on the screen and asked about them. And my clients repeatedly testified, 'What was this payment for?' 'That was for sex,'" Leppard said.

I'm Gipper
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J. Walter Weatherman said:

FireAg said:

Then show us the Venmo transaction…


I'm guessing it'll be in the report once it comes out? I'm assuming he wasn't dumb enough to put "underage hookers" in the subject line though.



There is no allegation he paid the minor I've seen

Further, the story is he didn't know she was a minor:

Quote:

Leppard also told ABC News that his client testified to House Ethics Committee that, based on her knowledge, Gaetz stopped having sex with the minor after he learned she was underage.

"Her understanding was that Matt Gaetz did not know that she was a minor, and that when he learned that she was a minor, that he broke off things and did not continue a sexual relationship until she turned 18," Leppard said.

I'm Gipper
Bob Knights Paper Hands
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Does being a member of Congress prevent you from being charged with solicitation of prostitution? Was a 17 year old under the age of consent in the jurisdiction they state this happened?

We've had so much bull**** recently, that I don't care what CBS or establishment types in Congress say. My give a **** meter doesn't register this if it's just a media blitz without action. Either arrest him for what you claim to have credible evidence of or STFU. Next.
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
J. Walter Weatherman said:

FireAg said:

Then show us the Venmo transaction…


I'm guessing it'll be in the report once it comes out? I'm assuming he wasn't dumb enough to put "underage hookers" in the subject line though.

If it was there, it would have already been leaked…

It would not be hard to link a transaction leaving Gaetz's account through Venmo to the party in question…

And even if he used a burner and a separate account that didn't link to his normal bank account(s), it would take an awful lot of laundering to try to hide that payment…

It's a time-stamped payment from one specific account to another…
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

FireAg said:

Then show us the Venmo transaction…


They were allegedly shown to the committee. Do you think all of the testimony should be released?


Quote:

Just to be clear, both of your clients testified that they were paid by Rep. Gaetz to have sex?" Chang asked Leppard.

"That's correct. The House was very clear about that and went through each. They essentially put the Venmo payments on the screen and asked about them. And my clients repeatedly testified, 'What was this payment for?' 'That was for sex,'" Leppard said.


If they exist, why did DOJ "miss" them?

I'll hang up and listen, counselor…
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bob Knights Paper Hands said:

Does being a member of Congress prevent you from being charged with solicitation of prostitution? Was a 17 year old under the age of consent in the jurisdiction they state this happened?

We've had so much bull**** recently, that I don't care what CBS or establishment types in Congress say. My give a **** meter doesn't register this if it's just a media blitz without action. Either arrest him for what you claim to have credible evidence of or STFU. Next.

PRECISELY my point…

If you've got him…nail him…

Otherwise, you don't have ****, you're all bluster and no bite…so STFU…
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Let's not forget the DOJ investigated and declined top prosecute Gaetz. So my question is whether or not this woman came forward during the DOJ investigation? If not, then how can anyone take what these women say seriously?
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

FireAg said:

Then show us the Venmo transaction…


I'm guessing it'll be in the report once it comes out? I'm assuming he wasn't dumb enough to put "underage hookers" in the subject line though.



There is no allegation he paid the minor I've seen

Further, the story is he didn't know she was a minor:

Quote:

Leppard also told ABC News that his client testified to House Ethics Committee that, based on her knowledge, Gaetz stopped having sex with the minor after he learned she was underage.

"Her understanding was that Matt Gaetz did not know that she was a minor, and that when he learned that she was a minor, that he broke off things and did not continue a sexual relationship until she turned 18," Leppard said.



Good catch. Venmo payments were (allegedly) just for sex and possibly drugs.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

If they exist, why did DOJ "miss" them?

I'll hang up and listen, counselor…


No idea. Guessing they saw them IF they exist.

You didn't answer my question btw

I'm Gipper
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Did the hookers bring the minor?

Reads to me like they saw there there.

Quote:

An attorney representing two women who testified before the House Ethics Committee told ABC News in an interview that former Rep. Matt Gaetz paid both his adult clients for sex.

Florida attorney Joel Leppard told ABC News' Juju Chang that one of his clients also witnessed Gaetz having sex with a third woman -- who was then 17 years old -- at a house party in Florida.

"She testified [that] in July of 2017, at this house party, she was walking out to the pool area, and she looked to her right, and she saw Rep. Gaetz having sex with her friend, who was 17," Leppard said.

Does it really matter why a seventeen year old was at a "house party" with admitted hookers present, pursuant to an invitation, I presume? If they didn't bring her with them, how she know about the party and get an invitation as well? As in she's a seventeen year old hooker too?

Those Florida "house parties" are infamous for a lot of reasons. JFF and Sumlin were at at least one when Johnny was collecting some awards. Stories started coming out about that party but were quickly quashed at the time. Hookers love to work the party circuit. No fuss, no muss no waiting for the next john to come around and very lucrative. Diddy fest Florida style.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
akm91 said:

Let's not forget the DOJ investigated and declined top prosecute Gaetz. So my question is whether or not this woman came forward during the DOJ investigation? If not, then how can anyone take what these women say seriously?


They testified in both.

Quote:

The two witnesses, who ABC News is not naming, both allegedly attended parties with the then-congressman and testified in both the DOJ and House Ethics investigations.


No doubt, DoJ doing nothing essentially ends the "sex trafficking" allegation IMO

I'm Gipper
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FireAg said:

Im Gipper said:

FireAg said:

Then show us the Venmo transaction…


They were allegedly shown to the committee. Do you think all of the testimony should be released?


Quote:

Just to be clear, both of your clients testified that they were paid by Rep. Gaetz to have sex?" Chang asked Leppard.

"That's correct. The House was very clear about that and went through each. They essentially put the Venmo payments on the screen and asked about them. And my clients repeatedly testified, 'What was this payment for?' 'That was for sex,'" Leppard said.


If they exist, why did DOJ "miss" them?

I'll hang up and listen, counselor…


DOJ investigation was limited to the sex trafficking charges only, based on that Bahamas trip right? Seems like the House Committee was looking at a lot more than that.

Assuming all of this will get answered soon enough though, so who knows.
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Quote:

If they exist, why did DOJ "miss" them?

I'll hang up and listen, counselor…


No idea. Guessing they saw them IF they exist.

You didn't answer my question btw

Release the report…release the evidence…

They don't have ****…that's why it hasn't been released…

If they had proof, DOJ would have pursued…

The ****ing House impeached Trump over a phone call claiming quid pro quo pro quo…

And it was all bull****…

DOJ illegally wire-tapped Trump and Trump associates over a complete fake "document"…

You literally can't trust anything these people claim…
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Does it really matter why a seventeen year old was at a "house party" with admitted hookers present, pursuant to an invitation, I presume? If they didn't bring her with them, how she know about the party and get an invitation as well? As in she's a seventeen year old hooker too?


IMO, bringing the minor there is much worse


I don't know if the minor was a hooker, but would not be a surprise!

I'm Gipper
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Release the report…release the evidence…


We disagree on this.

It's not fair to Gaetz.

I'm Gipper
twk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FireAg said:

What is the prerequisite experience?
More than two years of private practice. He doesn't have enough experience practicing law to be a partner at a firm of any size, and doesn't have any executive experience to counter that lack of practice experience. The DOJ is different from most other cabinet post in that so little of the job involves setting policy, where legislative experience might be a bigger factor.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Quote:

squabbles bubble up in January in the senate hearings (not just Gaetz), and Johnson and Thune both adjourn for a couple weeks (fake news piece crying about it). Two consecutive 210 day terms as a recess appointee, as long as the senate is adjourned for 10 days (SCOTUS precedent).

I believe you're conflicting two things here.

The 210 day terms is under the Vacancies Reform Act for people appointed as "acting". Discussed above why it doesn't apply to Gaetz.

A recess appointment would last until the end of the session. Discussed on other threads why Gaetz may not qualify.

FTR, my guess is that Trump does one of the above and just let it play out in the courts while Gaetz stays in the AG role. (Where he eventually loses)
I think it gets more detailed, but I am relying on what I am reading. I haven't kept up with this thread though, full disclosure. He's gonna put his people in charge for at least a year, is the bottom line.
Quote:

1. Appoint Gaetz and Hegseth as "First Assistants" to Key Roles
The most straightforward route under the FVRA is to ensure that Matt Gaetz and Pete Hegseth become the first assistants to the roles they are ultimately intended to assume. The act stipulates that a "first assistant" can automatically step in as the acting head when a vacancy occurs.

To achieve this, Trump would need to create or redesignate positions for both Gaetz and Hegsethlet's call them "Principal Deputy" positionsin the very departments they would ultimately lead. By appointing Gaetz as Principal Deputy of the Attorney General, for example, and similarly elevating Hegseth to a deputy position at the Department of Defense, Trump establishes them as the "first assistants" within the agency's leadership hierarchy.

This approach hinges on the simple principle of agency protocol: when the primary official steps down, the first assistant becomes the acting official, per FVRA guidelines. Thus, Trump could orchestrate a vacancy by removing the current officeholder or encouraging their resignation. Once a vacancy arises, Gaetz or Hegseth, being the official first assistant, would step into the acting role.

2. Create a Vacancy and Trigger the FVRA
Once Gaetz and Hegseth are installed in their newly crafted deputy roles, the next logical step would be to vacate the main position. This can be achieved either by requesting a resignation or by reassigning the current official. The moment this happens, the Federal Vacancies Reform Act kicks in, allowing the first assistant to serve as acting officer for up to 210 days.

During this time, Trump could then submit a nominee for the Senate to confirm. The clever twist here is that Trump doesn't need to submit Gaetz or Hegseth as nominees for the permanent rolehe can nominate someone entirely different. The submission of a nominee extends the duration of Gaetz's or Hegseth's acting tenure for as long as the nomination remains under consideration.

3. Utilize Senate Recesses and Extension Provisions

The FVRA allows for strategic extensions under specific circumstances. If the Senate happens to be in recess when the vacancy occurs or while a nomination is being reviewed, the 210-day clock can be paused. Therefore, by timing the initial appointments to coincide with known periods of Senate recesssuch as major holidays or adjournmentsTrump can effectively extend the acting duration of his appointees without having to secure Senate approval.

Furthermore, if the Senate rejects or withdraws the nominee, Trump can use this as a tool to reset the 210-day clock. This tactic could be repeated with multiple nominees, thus creating an extended cycle during which Gaetz and Hegseth can continue to serve in an acting capacity. Each rejection or withdrawal of a nominee effectively gives another 210-day term, during which the acting official can remain in the role.

Mitigating Legal Challenges

The Senate is not likely to let this move go unanswered, and lawsuits are all but guaranteed. Trump has experience in this arena, as the courts have previously weighed in on his appointment of Ken Cuccinelli in the Department of Homeland Security, deeming it unlawful for not following proper procedures.
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Quote:

Release the report…release the evidence…


We disagree on this.

It's not fair to Gaetz.

Since when in the last 8+ years has DOJ or factions in Congress been concerned with being "fair"?

There's no "there" there…once again…

What you are witnessing is a high stakes game of "chicken"…a lot of folks with a lot to lose if Gaetz gets power to come after corruption are trying to throw everything at him so he'll flinch…

If they actually had anything, we wouldn't even be playing this game…
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Return of the Creepy Porn Lawyer?

Quote:

The campaign against President-Elect Donald J. Trump's Attorney General pick, Congressman Matt Gaetz, begins in earnest today. Local Florida lawyer named Joel Leppard is set to make egregious claims about Gaetz in unchallenged media interviews.

Leppard, an Orlando-based specialist in personal injury claims and getting people off driving under the influence (DUI) charges, is understood to be touring Manhattan studios on Monday peddling the same debunked claims made about Gaetz three years ago.
LINK
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Since when in the last 8+ years has DOJ or factions in Congress been concerned with being "fair"?


And you wanted to keep being unfair???


Unless Gaetz consents, nothing in that ethics investigation should ever see the light of day.

I'm Gipper
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Return of the Creepy Porn Lawyer?

Quote:

The campaign against President-Elect Donald J. Trump's Attorney General pick, Congressman Matt Gaetz, begins in earnest today. Local Florida lawyer named Joel Leppard is set to make egregious claims about Gaetz in unchallenged media interviews.

Leppard, an Orlando-based specialist in personal injury claims and getting people off driving under the influence (DUI) charges, is understood to be touring Manhattan studios on Monday peddling the same debunked claims made about Gaetz three years ago.
LINK
CPL2?
CPL2024?
CPL_Floridaman?
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:



As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do you have a link to that plan?

I'm curious what it says about how you get them confirmed for the spot that makes them next in line to fill the vacancy

I'm Gipper
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tailgate88 said:

aggiehawg said:

Return of the Creepy Porn Lawyer?

Quote:

The campaign against President-Elect Donald J. Trump's Attorney General pick, Congressman Matt Gaetz, begins in earnest today. Local Florida lawyer named Joel Leppard is set to make egregious claims about Gaetz in unchallenged media interviews.

Leppard, an Orlando-based specialist in personal injury claims and getting people off driving under the influence (DUI) charges, is understood to be touring Manhattan studios on Monday peddling the same debunked claims made about Gaetz three years ago.
LINK
CPL2?
CPL2024?
CPL_Floridaman?


Hey, don't sell him short. Half the posters in this thread will be soon be quoting that guy as evidence that Gaetz should step aside.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

CPL2?
CPL2024?
CPL_Floridaman?
We'll see how many cable networks have this guy on tomorrow. And if the hosts are admiring a DUI lawyer as having "Presidential potential."
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

CPL2?
CPL2024?
CPL_Floridaman?
We'll see how many cable networks have this guy on tomorrow. And if the hosts are admiring a DUI lawyer as having "Presidential potential."


Nice!

I'm Gipper
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You're missing my point…

If they had something substantive on Gaetz, it would already have leaked to some reporter and subsequently published…

I'm saying release it because there's nothing substantive or definitive in there to begin with.

JHC…not even SCOTUS can keep **** confidential these days…lord know Congress can't…

There's…nothing…there…
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FireAg said:

That's what I keep coming back to…where's the proof???

We have hearsay from this person or that who would have motivations to tell a story…

But here is the proof?

The receipts? Text messages? Cash withdrawals? Money transactions?

All we have are unsubstantiated claims about a guy who is dangerous to several establishment types…
According to the letter from Gaetz to the committee that was posted early on in this thread, they have jailhouse tapes of the plot to frame him being hatched between his accuser and a guy who was already in jail for trying to setup somebody else the same way. The fact that no news organization is asking to see that evidence is proof enough for me that the fix is in with the uniparty folks. Hope he gets a recess appt.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

According to the letter from Gaetz to the committee that was posted early on in this thread, they have jailhouse tapes of the plot to frame him being hatched between his accuser and a guy who was already in jail for trying to setup somebody else the same way. The fact that no news organization is asking to see that evidence is proof enough for me that the fix is in with the uniparty folks. Hope he gets a recess appt.
That makes sense to me. How does a DUI lawyer end up representing two self confessed adult hookers? he takes low level crim cases to supplement his PI income which is hit and miss but always takes a long time, unless he settles out quickly for the nuisance value cash and takes 33-40 of the settlement as fees, PLUS costs added onto that.

He is the Florida version of Saul Goodman.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

According to the letter from Gaetz to the committee that was posted early on in this thread, they have jailhouse tapes of the plot to frame him being hatched between his accuser and a guy who was already in jail for trying to setup somebody else the same way. The fact that no news organization is asking to see that evidence is proof enough for me that the fix is in with the uniparty folks. Hope he gets a recess appt.
That makes sense to me. How does a DUI lawyer end up representing two self confessed adult hookers? he takes low level crim cases to supplement his PI income which is hit and miss but always takes a long time, unless he settles out quickly for the nuisance value cash and takes 33-40 of the settlement as fees, PLUS costs added onto that.

He is the Florida version of Saul Goodman.
Or Michael Avenatti.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Or Michael Avenatti.
Avenatti was a high powered attorney (entertainment lawyers can do well financially) before he got involved with Stormy Daniels.

This guy was more of the Saul Goodman advertising on bus benches before these hooker clients and his Manhattan studio tours.
Monkeypoxfighter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Im Gipper said:

Did the hookers bring the minor?

Reads to me like they saw there there.

Quote:

An attorney representing two women who testified before the House Ethics Committee told ABC News in an interview that former Rep. Matt Gaetz paid both his adult clients for sex.

Florida attorney Joel Leppard told ABC News' Juju Chang that one of his clients also witnessed Gaetz having sex with a third woman -- who was then 17 years old -- at a house party in Florida.

"She testified [that] in July of 2017, at this house party, she was walking out to the pool area, and she looked to her right, and she saw Rep. Gaetz having sex with her friend, who was 17," Leppard said.

Does it really matter why a seventeen year old was at a "house party" with admitted hookers present, pursuant to an invitation, I presume? If they didn't bring her with them, how she know about the party and get an invitation as well? As in she's a seventeen year old hooker too?

Those Florida "house parties" are infamous for a lot of reasons. JFF and Sumlin were at at least one when Johnny was collecting some awards. Stories started coming out about that party but were quickly quashed at the time. Hookers love to work the party circuit. No fuss, no muss no waiting for the next john to come around and very lucrative. Diddy fest Florida style.
It does matter that a sitting member of Congress with aspirations for AG was. "Everyone does it in Florida" is hardly a good defemse. The goaltending for this d-bag is comical.
It only took me a year to figure out this place is nuts!
rathAG05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Every sane man, should want this report to come out. I don't like Gaetz for what he did in the house, but if he had sex with a minor, and there is clear evidence of that, then it should be revealed. I dont care if he's Trumps pick and Trump has a mandate, blah, blah, blah. If this is true, he should be kicked out of congress and not barred from the AG position.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.