i can already hear the teeth gnashing if republicans pull this off and it tips the scales
maine promised to do the same to offset EC implications, but maine law would not allow a winner-take-all change to take effect before the election. potentially significant because it would mean MI-WI-PA would no longer be enough for harris to win, she'd need one of GA, AZ, NV, NC as well.
very savvy and ruthless move if this ends up deciding the election
If Nebraska Rs switch the state to winner-take-all, and it’s too late for Maine to do the same, the impact could be enormous.
— Andrew Prokop (@awprokop) September 19, 2024
Namely, WI-MI-PA would no longer be enough to get Harris to 270.
She’d need at least one more swing state (NV, GA, AZ, or NC) to get over the line pic.twitter.com/XONmKUgLti
maine promised to do the same to offset EC implications, but maine law would not allow a winner-take-all change to take effect before the election. potentially significant because it would mean MI-WI-PA would no longer be enough for harris to win, she'd need one of GA, AZ, NV, NC as well.
very savvy and ruthless move if this ends up deciding the election