Hail Mary? You mean long running state-level fight to get rid of this silliness? Let Democrat states break up their EC votes by district/county/city etc, fine by me.
there are deadlines to take your name off the ballot and RFK missed that deadline in Michigan.TexAgs91 said:You're talking about Michigan refusing to take RFK's name off the ballot even though he's no longer running?barbacoa taco said:
Desperate move by a desperate party who knows they're going to lose and so has to use dirty tactics like making 11th hour changes to election laws to favor themselves
barbacoa taco said:
Desperate move by a desperate party who knows they're going to lose and so has to use dirty tactics like making 11th hour changes to election laws to favor themselves
Fireman said:
Believe Trump will win with close to 300 EC, but to suggest Arizona is a swing state is surprising to me, as they become more like California each day.
Kraft Punk said:barbacoa taco said:
Desperate move by a desperate party who knows they're going to lose and so has to use dirty tactics like making 11th hour changes to election laws to favor themselves
Nah... that's only the case if....
They unleash a Chinese virus to destroy the economy
Start national riots over a violent multifelon's fentanyl overdose
Crank up vote by mail & ballot drops in lots of illegal ballots
Shut down counting centers bc of make believe plumbing issues
Boarding up windows at counting centers to pull illegal ballot bags from under the table
Not reporting counts the day of the election which was never a problem until 2020
If the republicans do all that you can call em desperate
they've been using this system for 30 years. it hasn't been revoked yet because they don't have the votes to do it. and IMO it's a much better system than WTA anyway, it actually gives people some representation they otherwise wouldn't have in a presidential race. and no, it doesn't just benefit Democrats, look at Maine.nortex97 said:
Hail Mary? You mean long running state-level fight to get rid of this silliness? Let Democrat states break up their EC votes by district/county/city etc, fine by me.
Then Democrats such as yourself should be pushing for this to be done in NY, CA, and Oregon, right? Oh wait, ranked choice voting is only pushed in red states like Alaska and WTA is only opposed in red states like Nebraska. Rules for thee but not for me.barbacoa taco said:they've been using this system for 30 years. it hasn't been revoked yet because they don't have the votes to do it. and IMO it's a much better system than WTA anyway, it actually gives people some representation they otherwise wouldn't have in a presidential race. and no, it doesn't just benefit Democrats, look at Maine.nortex97 said:
Hail Mary? You mean long running state-level fight to get rid of this silliness? Let Democrat states break up their EC votes by district/county/city etc, fine by me.
this is being done now just to help Trump. if they want to make it WTA, then do it for the next election, if you can get the votes.
barbacoa taco said:
Desperate move by a desperate party who knows they're going to lose and so has to use dirty tactics like making 11th hour changes to election laws to favor themselves
barbacoa taco said:
Desperate move by a desperate party who knows they're going to lose and so has to use dirty tactics like making 11th hour changes to election laws to favor themselves
Good thing that is not what happened, no matter how many times it's repeated.mslags97 said:barbacoa taco said:
Desperate move by a desperate party who knows they're going to lose and so has to use dirty tactics like making 11th hour changes to election laws to favor themselves
Hahahahahahahaha. You so funny. You may be the biggest hypocrite on this board….
At least we don't stop "counting" votes in the middle of the night because the election isn't going our way….
barbacoa taco said:Good thing that is not what happened, no matter how many times it's repeated.mslags97 said:barbacoa taco said:
Desperate move by a desperate party who knows they're going to lose and so has to use dirty tactics like making 11th hour changes to election laws to favor themselves
Hahahahahahahaha. You so funny. You may be the biggest hypocrite on this board….
At least we don't stop "counting" votes in the middle of the night because the election isn't going our way….
barbacoa taco said:Good thing that is not what happened, no matter how many times it's repeated.mslags97 said:barbacoa taco said:
Desperate move by a desperate party who knows they're going to lose and so has to use dirty tactics like making 11th hour changes to election laws to favor themselves
Hahahahahahahaha. You so funny. You may be the biggest hypocrite on this board….
At least we don't stop "counting" votes in the middle of the night because the election isn't going our way….
barbacoa taco said:they've been using this system for 30 years. it hasn't been revoked yet because they don't have the votes to do it. and IMO it's a much better system than WTA anyway, it actually gives people some representation they otherwise wouldn't have in a presidential race. and no, it doesn't just benefit Democrats, look at Maine.nortex97 said:
Hail Mary? You mean long running state-level fight to get rid of this silliness? Let Democrat states break up their EC votes by district/county/city etc, fine by me.
this is being done now just to help Trump. if they want to make it WTA, then do it for the next election, if you can get the votes.
barbacoa taco said:they've been using this system for 30 years. it hasn't been revoked yet because they don't have the votes to do it. and IMO it's a much better system than WTA anyway, it actually gives people some representation they otherwise wouldn't have in a presidential race. and no, it doesn't just benefit Democrats, look at Maine.nortex97 said:
Hail Mary? You mean long running state-level fight to get rid of this silliness? Let Democrat states break up their EC votes by district/county/city etc, fine by me.
this is being done now just to help Trump. if they want to make it WTA, then do it for the next election, if you can get the votes.
barbacoa taco said:don't forget Texas, and these were lawful changes made well in advance of the election, to accommodate a major thing that was going on at the time.TexAgs91 said:Now do the 2020 election when Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin changed their election law before the election.barbacoa taco said:
Desperate move by a desperate party who knows they're going to lose and so has to use dirty tactics like making 11th hour changes to election laws to favor themselves
changing election laws 6 weeks before the election violates Purcell. and if Nebraska does this, they intentionally waited this long just so Maine couldn't counteract it.
barbacoa taco said:
I think you're in for a rude awakening. It's going to be a close election. and if Trump and his people were so confident then they wouldn't be working in bad faith to change election rules in NE and GA this close to an election, or impeding voter registration efforts in TX. Trump's already decided he won. If he loses, he and his allies have a plan to overthrow it, just like they tried to in 2020.
Who is your nominee this week?barbacoa taco said:
Desperate move by a desperate party who knows they're going to lose and so has to use dirty tactics like making 11th hour changes to election laws to favor themselves
barbacoa taco said:
I think you're in for a rude awakening. It's going to be a close election. and if Trump and his people were so confident then they wouldn't be working in bad faith to change election rules in NE and GA this close to an election, or impeding voter registration efforts in TX. Trump's already decided he won. If he loses, he and his allies have a plan to overthrow it, just like they tried to in 2020.
Nice dunk.deddog said:barbacoa taco said:
Desperate move by a desperate party who knows they're going to lose and so has to use dirty tactics like making 11th hour changes to election laws to favor themselves
lol , but the move to take out Awesome Joe Biden and replace him with a loser like Kamala was brilliance I'm sure
nai06 said:
Let me help you out.
The Gateway Pundit is full of **** and has lazy reporters that don't do the basics of reading what they report on.
See the other thread if you want proof.Logos Stick said:nai06 said:
Let me help you out.
The Gateway Pundit is full of **** and has lazy reporters that don't do the basics of reading what they report on.
Typical. Your logical fallacy is the ad hom.
You may be correct but none of what you posted is "proof".nai06 said:See the other thread if you want proof.Logos Stick said:nai06 said:
Let me help you out.
The Gateway Pundit is full of **** and has lazy reporters that don't do the basics of reading what they report on.
Typical. Your logical fallacy is the ad hom.
nai06 said:See the other thread if you want proof.Logos Stick said:nai06 said:
Let me help you out.
The Gateway Pundit is full of **** and has lazy reporters that don't do the basics of reading what they report on.
Typical. Your logical fallacy is the ad hom.
I can do both. The Gateway Pundit was wrong about the UOCAVA and they are frequently terrible at reporting facts. Don't forget they at one point relied on MfBarnes as a legitimate source of news.Logos Stick said:nai06 said:See the other thread if you want proof.Logos Stick said:nai06 said:
Let me help you out.
The Gateway Pundit is full of **** and has lazy reporters that don't do the basics of reading what they report on.
Typical. Your logical fallacy is the ad hom.
You logical fallacy is the ad hom... again. Attack the substance and not the messenger, if you are able