RESULTS of our joint @trafalgar_group @InsiderPolling #PresidentialDebate2024 #Battlegroundstate #poll.

1) Supporting for president before the debate.

47% Trump
47% Harris
2% Others
4% Undecided

2) Who won the debate?

55% Harris
43% Trump
2% Tie

3) Who are you…

— Robert C. Cahaly (@RobertCahaly) September 11, 2024

SpreadsheetAg said:

---

Trump vs Harris was like sitting at Thanksgiving while your grumpy prickly uncle argued with your whiny drunk melodramatic aunt and the two uppity little cousins argued for the aunt because she gave them fifty bucks for their birthday.

— dialetheic bias (@biasbreakdown) September 11, 2024

---

America, this is a safe space.

Who won the debate and why?

— Robert Griffin III (@RGIII) September 11, 2024

Aggie Apotheosis said:

---

annie88 said:

---

I think polls are pretty much as worthless as debates, but there does seem to be a theme.

---

C-Span does not do polls.

The rest of them are Twitter polls. I'm sure if you go to the leading liberal twitter feeds you'll find polls of the Twitterati that show completely different results.

Anybody who watched that debate tonight and came away with the idea that Donald is anything other than an unhinged, senile old man yelling at clouds needs to have his head examined.

I wish it weren't so. I'd vote for DeSantis or Nikki. I won't vote for Trump or Kamala.

Just read that the Democrats raised more money tonight than any political party in history has in a week.

It's over. It was over the second Biden resigned.

I just hope the Democrats don't landslide both houses of Congress. It looks like Montana may be the key.

---

Bunk Moreland said:

---

Yes. That was one of them. She baited him multiple times. And then it gets him off track defending himself nonstop vs pressing against her. And when he defends himself HE RAMBLES. that's that worst part. Republicans and Trump supporters will hear it and not understand how bad it sounds. But others hear it and cringe. When he finally comes out of his triggered daze he then attacks her on random things. It just doesn't come off as coherent.

---

Quote:

---

We'll talk dead cats for three days.

---

Who won the ABC News presidential debate?

— CSPAN (@cspan) September 11, 2024

BenFiasco14 said:

---

95LawAg said:

---

I initially wondered why Trump would make the focus of his closing statement, "Why hasn't she done it for the past 3.5 years?" when the question is so easily rebutted with, "Dude, she's been VICE president."

I assumed most Americans understand that the vice president does not hold that kind of power, but after reading some comments on here, it appears that was a wrong assumption.

It just seems foolish to base your closing statement on something easily countered.

---

Oh, so the VP gets to ignore the record of the President and their party while in power? Come on.

---

I don't know who made this cartoon - but it is perfect! pic.twitter.com/KrXOEcB5bV

— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) September 11, 2024

BREAKING: Audio obtained by @FDRLST of a call made to police on August 26th about a group of Haitian migrants carrying geese in Springfield, OH

The media has been telling us this is all a lie pic.twitter.com/e7OP2Ntg0X

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) September 11, 2024

95LawAg said:

---

4stringAg said:

---

95LawAg said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

95LawAg said:

---

I initially wondered why Trump would make the focus of his closing statement, "Why hasn't she done for the past 3.5 years?" when the question is so easily rebutted with, "Dude, she's been VICE president."

I assumed most Americans understand that the vice president does not hold that kind of power, but after reading some comments on here, it appears that was a wrong assumption.

It just seems foolish to base your closing statement on something easily countered.

---

They dont, trust me. You think most Americans understand how the three branches work? No, they dont.

---

Unfortunately, I think you're right, but it was disappointing to read comments on here from people who thought it was a great closing.

Kamala probably can't rebut that directly, because she would effectively be downplaying her own role as VP, but her campaign, PACs, etc, can do thst more tactfully, and will. It's easy.

---

I disagree. Trump needs people to see she was as much a part of the current disaster as Biden. She's trying to run from her own administration. Why? Because it's a failure and her team knows it. Painting her as Biden 2.0 is effective.

---

But she wasn't. She was vice president. It's not her administration, it's Biden's.

But, you might be right because dumb American voters don't understand that. It's unfortunate, but I suppose effective strategy.

---

TA-OP said:

---

BenFiasco14 said:

---

95LawAg said:

---

I initially wondered why Trump would make the focus of his closing statement, "Why hasn't she done it for the past 3.5 years?" when the question is so easily rebutted with, "Dude, she's been VICE president."

I assumed most Americans understand that the vice president does not hold that kind of power, but after reading some comments on here, it appears that was a wrong assumption.

It just seems foolish to base your closing statement on something easily countered.

---

Oh, so the VP gets to ignore the record of the President and their party while in power? Come on.

---

Eagerly awaiting a single user on here to praise Mike Pence for his job as VP.

---

Ghost of Bisbee said:

---

The thing is there are only 115K respondents. Heavily influenced by where the polls are being retweeted/shared

---

annie88 said:

---

Ghost of Bisbee said:

---

The thing is there are only 115K respondents. Heavily influenced by where the polls are being retweeted/shared

---

Yeah, who cares what the American people think.

---

annie88 said:

---

Do you see how she can hardly wait for him to finish his sentence before she is interrupting him and try to prove him wrong.

This is how all of the Republicans are interviewed. They are not allowed to talk. They are talked over and they are insulted. On the other hand when they interviewed Democrats, they just let them talk forever and spew what is mostly lies.

And we have seen videos, photos and first-hand accounts commenting on this. And he made a point that people are reporting this just because the police aren't doesn't mean it's not true. Look what happened in Colorado. Their ****ing lunatic governor was denying these takeovers from the Venezuelan gangs were happening and they are. It is so for them to definitively say it is not true and it is debunked is absolutely absolute bull****

---

TA-OP said:

---

BenFiasco14 said:

---

95LawAg said:

---

I initially wondered why Trump would make the focus of his closing statement, "Why hasn't she done it for the past 3.5 years?" when the question is so easily rebutted with, "Dude, she's been VICE president."

I assumed most Americans understand that the vice president does not hold that kind of power, but after reading some comments on here, it appears that was a wrong assumption.

It just seems foolish to base your closing statement on something easily countered.

---

Oh, so the VP gets to ignore the record of the President and their party while in power? Come on.

---

Eagerly awaiting a single user on here to praise Mike Pence for his job as VP.

---

95LawAg said:

---

4stringAg said:

---

95LawAg said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

95LawAg said:

---

I initially wondered why Trump would make the focus of his closing statement, "Why hasn't she done for the past 3.5 years?" when the question is so easily rebutted with, "Dude, she's been VICE president."

I assumed most Americans understand that the vice president does not hold that kind of power, but after reading some comments on here, it appears that was a wrong assumption.

It just seems foolish to base your closing statement on something easily countered.

---

They dont, trust me. You think most Americans understand how the three branches work? No, they dont.

---

Unfortunately, I think you're right, but it was disappointing to read comments on here from people who thought it was a great closing.

Kamala probably can't rebut that directly, because she would effectively be downplaying her own role as VP, but her campaign, PACs, etc, can do thst more tactfully, and will. It's easy.

---

I disagree. Trump needs people to see she was as much a part of the current disaster as Biden. She's trying to run from her own administration. Why? Because it's a failure and her team knows it. Painting her as Biden 2.0 is effective.

---

But she wasn't. She was vice president. It's not her administration, it's Biden's.

But, you might be right because dumb American voters don't understand that. It's unfortunate, but I suppose effective strategy.

---

oh no said:

---

Swifties vote for communism and the continuation of our Marxist regime on command, don't they? They probably think voting for the Marxist regime is "protecting our democracy".

---

Quote:

---

dichotomy between Dana Bash's treatment of Vance vs. Harris/Walz

---

Aggie Apotheosis said:

---

annie88 said:

---

I think polls are pretty much as worthless as debates, but there does seem to be a theme.

---

C-Span does not do polls.

The rest of them are Twitter polls. I'm sure if you go to the leading liberal twitter feeds you'll find polls of the Twitterati that show completely different results.

Anybody who watched that debate tonight and came away with the idea that Donald is anything other than an unhinged, senile old man yelling at clouds needs to have his head examined.

I wish it weren't so. I'd vote for DeSantis or Nikki. I won't vote for Trump or Kamala.

Just read that the Democrats raised more money tonight than any political party in history has in a week.

It's over. It was over the second Biden resigned.

I just hope the Democrats don't landslide both houses of Congress. It looks like Montana may be the key.

---

GoAgs11 said:

---

Aggie Apotheosis said:

---

annie88 said:

---

I think polls are pretty much as worthless as debates, but there does seem to be a theme.

---

C-Span does not do polls.

The rest of them are Twitter polls. I'm sure if you go to the leading liberal twitter feeds you'll find polls of the Twitterati that show completely different results.

Anybody who watched that debate tonight and came away with the idea that Donald is anything other than an unhinged, senile old man yelling at clouds needs to have his head examined.

I wish it weren't so. I'd vote for DeSantis or Nikki. I won't vote for Trump or Kamala.

Just read that the Democrats raised more money tonight than any political party in history has in a week.

It's over. It was over the second Biden resigned.

I just hope the Democrats don't landslide both houses of Congress. It looks like Montana may be the key.

---

Delu lu

---

Wow, these wireless earbuds look neat!

Anyway, here's a totally unrelated photo of Kamala from the debate I added for fun... pic.twitter.com/Sf2yG0ztQP

— Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) September 11, 2024

GoAgs11 said:

---

This is all Kubaki theater if trump wins he wont get anything done if kamlal wins its another 4 years of obango

---

MarkTwain said:

---

Interesting

Wow, these wireless earbuds look neat!

Anyway, here's a totally unrelated photo of Kamala from the debate I added for fun... pic.twitter.com/Sf2yG0ztQP

— Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) September 11, 2024

---

Jeeper79 said:

---

MarkTwain said:

---

Interesting

Wow, these wireless earbuds look neat!

Anyway, here's a totally unrelated photo of Kamala from the debate I added for fun... pic.twitter.com/Sf2yG0ztQP

— Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) September 11, 2024

---

There are other angles that show these two aren't the same.

---

95LawAg said:

---

I initially wondered why Trump would make the focus of his closing statement, "Why hasn't she done it for the past 3.5 years?" when the question is so easily rebutted with, "Dude, she's been VICE president."

I assumed most Americans understand that the vice president does not hold that kind of power, but after reading some comments on here, it appears that was a wrong assumption.

It just seems foolish to base your closing statement on something easily countered.

---

Australia's Sky News gives the most honest review of the Kamala/Trump debate you will ever see pic.twitter.com/Rd8fJwn0SB

— ULTRA MAGA PARTY 👑 (@MaxEvansUMP) September 11, 2024