*****Official TRUMP v HARRIS Debate Thread*****

237,628 Views | 2616 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by samurai_science
ttha_aggie_09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's not that deep. Kamala supports literally everything Joe did and her policies would be exactly like Joes. Joe has done nothing to stop things like illegal immigration and neither will Kamala - because their handlers don't want them to.

Sure, she maybe didn't have that power to stop them but she wouldn't regardless and she technically was border czar assigned with "fixing the border" so your comment of her not being able to do anything isn't exactly truthful either.
WestHoustonAg79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I obviously have limited perspective being in a community that get swayed 0 by a debate or any political rah rah.

Excuse my ignorance, but just have to think statistically unless it was a Brandon bow out 2.0 showing by either that it doesn't historically move the needle as much as we think either way 50 days from now.

Would love for the Muh Poll guys to prove me wrong or show that data but think it's prob the case.

Someone posted a poll already and that's ludicrous and/or fake. Either way polling ppl after a debate no matter how it went is ridiculous.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
t_J_e_C_x said:

Ag with kids said:

SquirrellyDan said:

DonHenley said:

It was a bad night for Trump.

It was bad in the sense that he should have wiped the floor with her. Overall nothing new came out. Harris did do a much better job than I thought she was capable of, regardless of the clear bias by the moderators.

But if this decides the election, it's trumps own fault. He should have easily been able to make her look stupid but he failed miserably.
Well, Harris never got put on the spot by them. They softballed her all night long while throwing Nolan Ryan fastballs at Trump's head with all their fact checking.

I'm not a Trump fan but that was ****ing embarrassing for ABC how biased they were.

One big point that stuck out to me.

Trump mentioned people eating pets, etc.

Muir immediately "fact checked" by saying "since you brought up Springfield, Ohio, blah blah blah".

Except Trump did NOT bring up Springfield, Ohio. He just mentioned people eating pets.

So, that was already a planned attack on Trump.


He did bring up Springfield actually, just to correct this. The quote was "In Springfield, they're eating the dogs... The people that came in... They're eating the cats - they're eating the pets of the people that live there."
Perhaps I missed the Springfield comment...

But, it's quite convenient that they already had a moderator rebuttal ready for Muir to read.
95LawAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
4stringAg said:

95LawAg said:

samurai_science said:

95LawAg said:

I initially wondered why Trump would make the focus of his closing statement, "Why hasn't she done for the past 3.5 years?" when the question is so easily rebutted with, "Dude, she's been VICE president."

I assumed most Americans understand that the vice president does not hold that kind of power, but after reading some comments on here, it appears that was a wrong assumption.

It just seems foolish to base your closing statement on something easily countered.
They dont, trust me. You think most Americans understand how the three branches work? No, they dont.


Unfortunately, I think you're right, but it was disappointing to read comments on here from people who thought it was a great closing.

Kamala probably can't rebut that directly, because she would effectively be downplaying her own role as VP, but her campaign, PACs, etc, can do thst more tactfully, and will. It's easy.


I disagree. Trump needs people to see she was as much a part of the current disaster as Biden. She's trying to run from her own administration. Why? Because it's a failure and her team knows it. Painting her as Biden 2.0 is effective.


But she wasn't. She was vice president. It's not her administration, it's Biden's.

But, you might be right because dumb American voters don't understand that. It's unfortunate, but I suppose effective strategy.
Quincey P. Morris
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ANSC Ag said:

Do we think Trumps team gives him accurate information and he doesn't use it or they shield him from facts and inadvertently sent him out to step on a rake?

He's claiming his team has shown him polls saying he won the debate. Seems like typical Trump bravado, but dunno.


I have no idea. I could see it either way.
cecil77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She claims credit for "accomplishments" of, the administration.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Watched the first two minutes of this and tapped out.

Saw first few seconds where they read the rules. Heard it reenforced that the candidates were not provided the questions in advance.

Saw Kamala awkwardly come out and introduce herself.

Seemed dressed like she was there to officiate a Mexican lesbian wedding.

Trump makes her come to him. Comes over on his side. Then Trump says 'have fun.'

First words out Kamala's mouth is how she's just a small town girl. Doesn't answer the question, blames Trump for covid, invokes project 2025 and runs out of time.

Trump responds similar to how he did last debate. Corrects the inconsistencies then tries to answer the question then rambles on until end of time.

Checked out at this point.

Sounds like the media will now declare Kamala the winner and that Trump is done for.

We'll talk dead cats for three days.

They'll put out a couple polls indicating a Kamala debate bump, and we'll move on until the next major incident to capture the news cycle.
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TheGoodAg0213 said:

Save the geese! Save the cats! Vote Trump


annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Because she's a ****ing coward Who cheated tonight, had a script, most likely had earphones, got bailed out by the moderators I'm and that's all she could follow.

She really is a total imbecilic ****. It's disgusting to see the media proper up like this.

Trump 2024

annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If they do another debate. They should insist that she wears no earrings. I think her performance will be quite different.

Now it's possible she wasn't wearing the microphones, but it seems like she was.
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You understand that most Americans that vote Dem believe that the rich don't pay their fair share of income tax? That's the ignorance that is our electorate. Do you realize that they think Trump is fascist while Kamala supported the covid vaccine mandate which is more anti-freedom than anything Trump did? Do you realize that many democrats actually believe that the war on poverty has been a success? That's the bs we have to live with.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bondag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
annie88 said:

If they do another debate. They should insist that she wears no earrings. I think her performance will be quite different.

Now it's possible she wasn't wearing the microphones, but it seems like she was.


There was one point where she was rambling and about to get herself in trouble then abruptly completely changed the topic mid sentence to something Trump had said earlier in the debate. Not saying she was wearing an earpiece but the whole sequence was very strange
96AgGrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm honestly not sure how she could be listening to instructions and still process new information from Trump and the moderators. The human mind doesn't multitask that well.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think polls are pretty much as worthless as debates, but there does seem to be a theme.








TyHolden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
boom...**** you cnn

annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
96AgGrad said:

I'm honestly not sure how she could be listening to instructions and still process new information from Trump and the moderators. The human mind doesn't multitask that well.


I don't think she could've functioned without one personally. But even so if there is another debate, I still think she should have to be earring-less.
rondis23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ABC and Muir were out to get Trump, and Kamala helped.

Before the first Comercial break Trump said "I would end the Ukraine/Russian war before I am sworn in if elected".
- Muir "welcome back, President Trump before the break you said you would end the war within 24 hours. You did, you said that before the break".

This was a set up. Trump VS. 3.

- Muir- Wins the Gold
-Kamala- Given the Silver
-Trump- Set UP
GoAgs11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forget those libs of f16 said he lost
MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I just went through Instagram and Comma-la is getting roasted in the comments.
Ozzy Osbourne
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TyHolden said:

boom...**** you cnn




JD Vance is so good. We don't deserve him
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kamala got that Taylor Swift bump now.

It ain't enough for the media to declare Kamala trounces Trump in debate.

The numbers gotta match up.

How they do that?

Get Taylor Swift to tweet moments after the debate ends, conduct a poll of Taylor Swift voters and report on that.

Thats what we'll see tomorrow and through the weekend.
johnnyblaze36
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TyHolden said:

boom...**** you cnn


If we have to meme about it to get you "journalists" attention on the actual pressing issues in these communities is a great strategy really.

Vance is politely telling her you aren't a journalist and never will be nor will anybody on your network but if you'd like to dispute the claims about cats and ducks have at it. You'll be amazed what else you find.
20ag07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some tin foil hat stuff around here for sure.

Every question asked was something Trump's team should have known would be asked and scripted.

But earpieces is what some people are going with.

(Sometimes people have to learn to take an L. I certainly didn't like the outcome tonight, but I don't wear tinfoil.)
Artorias
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ozzy Osbourne said:

TyHolden said:

boom...**** you cnn




JD Vance is so good. We don't deserve him
Colins is such a shill
TyHolden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
johnnyblaze36 said:

TyHolden said:

boom...**** you cnn


If we have to meme about it to get you "journalists" attention on the actual pressing issues in these communities is a great strategy really.

Vance is politely telling her you aren't a journalist and never will be nor will anybody on your network but if you'd like to dispute the claims about cats and ducks have at it. You'll be amazed what else you find.
Twitter is our only leverage and that's where memes come in. MSM will laugh at it because most libs have left twitter. You post it on Threads and it's deleted.

Elon is probably the most important person for this country. How he is still alive is unbelievable. He must have paid some serious cash to get dirt on everybody.
BartInLA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think it really comes down to one issue.

Are you okay with your pets being eaten by immigrants? If no vote Trump.
johnnyblaze36
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Couldn't agree more.
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KUBIAK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Don't think anyone's mentioned this- Trump looked a lot younger tonight, especially in his face. Must have lost some weight. The camera angle was not good for Kamala. I kept thinking she got a barcode tat under her chin, but it was just weird neck wrinkles. Anyone else notice that?

Aggie Apotheosis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annie88 said:

I think polls are pretty much as worthless as debates, but there does seem to be a theme.










C-Span does not do polls.

The rest of them are Twitter polls. I'm sure if you go to the leading liberal twitter feeds you'll find polls of the Twitterati that show completely different results.

Anybody who watched that debate tonight and came away with the idea that Donald is anything other than an unhinged, senile old man yelling at clouds needs to have his head examined.

I wish it weren't so. I'd vote for DeSantis or Nikki. I won't vote for Trump or Kamala.

Just read that the Democrats raised more money tonight than any political party in history has in a week.

It's over. It was over the second Biden resigned.

I just hope the Democrats don't landslide both houses of Congress. It looks like Montana may be the key.

SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CSPAN at 75-25 now

sanangelo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TyHolden said:

boom...**** you cnn




San Angelo LIVE!
https://sanangelolive.com/
rondis23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SpreadsheetAg said:

CSPAN at 75-25 now




I don't see ABC or David Muir as an Option...
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Quote:

C-Span does not do polls.

Quote:

Quote:

CSPAN at 75-25 now







 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.