Muh Polls

817,939 Views | 5744 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by ts5641
2023NCAggies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Captn_Ag05 said:

I really dislike it when they push out battleground polls that are like this rather than by individual states. But, still, good news for Trump. Especially given the pollster


They had Harris up 6 pts nationally their last poll on 9-23. Haha
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2023NCAggies said:

Michigan is a 0.7% RCP average lead for Harris now. It was 5.7 for Biden on election night. Won by 2.78%

Michigan is going to be interesting, A lot of country folks in Michigan, and union workers are not in lockstep with DEMs this election. Also the Muslim Mayor endorsing Trump did not help. Hezbollah getting torched isn't helping either.


Trump has improved his standing with every key demographic in Michigan. I feel that the tide is turning there.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quo Vadis? said:

Informal poll


Ouch. That will leave a mark. So somebody explain it to me, I keep seeing all the demographics that have traditionally leaned Dem that are moving hard right. What demographic are these polls over sampling to keep showing this as a toss up? The only one I am aware of that is going hard left is unmarried women. Is there really the depth of voters in that demographic to overcome all these others shifts to the right?
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A few of these states have very small Hispanic populations (less than 7%). But another sign of movement towards Trump

Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txags92 said:

Quo Vadis? said:

Informal poll


Ouch. That will leave a mark. So somebody explain it to me, I keep seeing all the demographics that have traditionally leaned Dem that are moving hard right. What demographic are these polls over sampling to keep showing this as a toss up? The only one I am aware of that is going hard left is unmarried women. Is there really the depth of voters in that demographic to overcome all these others shifts to the right?


College educated whites continue to shift left. Men slightly, women by bigger margins.
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You mean left?
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes, sorry.
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, nationally Latinos are about 11-12% of the vote and white voters are about 66%. If Trump loses a point in white voters, he'd need to increase his perfomance among latinos by 6 points to offset it.

Now, a place like Wisconsin it's 89% white to 3% Latino, so he'd need around a 30 point improvement among Latinos if he loses a point of the white vote. Additionally, white voters in WI used to around a 50%/50% college to non-college mix like 10 years. Now, it's 60%/40%, so all these trends are counteracting each other
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TRM said:

Yeah, nationally Latinos are about 11-12% of the vote and white voters are about 66%. If Trump loses a point in white voters, he'd need to increase his perfomance among latinos by 6 points to offset it.

Now, a place like Wisconsin it's 89% white to 3% Latino, so he'd need around a 30 point improvement among Latinos if he loses a point of the white vote. Additionally, white voters in WI used to around a 50%/50% college to non-college mix like 10 years. Now, it's 60%/40%, so all these trends are counteracting each other
Hopefully white vote will be around 70%. If it is 66%, he is in trouble.
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quo Vadis? said:

Informal poll


To be fair at the end of the video I saw one hand at the back...but just one. Which actually is more damning because it shows it likely wasn't staged because if it was it would be 100%.
falafel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Has anyone compared 2024 demographic polls to 2016 BCE (before covid era). Curious if the percentage shifts are as dramatic.
Legend
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Captn_Ag05 said:

txags92 said:

Quo Vadis? said:

Informal poll


Ouch. That will leave a mark. So somebody explain it to me, I keep seeing all the demographics that have traditionally leaned Dem that are moving hard right. What demographic are these polls over sampling to keep showing this as a toss up? The only one I am aware of that is going hard left is unmarried women. Is there really the depth of voters in that demographic to overcome all these others shifts to the right?


College educated whites continue to shift left. Men slightly, women by bigger margins.


STAFF: Not trying to derail the thread; trying to talk about poll demographics:

This shift in college educated people is true. Corporations, law firms, professional services firms, etc. have all gotten very involved in social causes/DEI efforts, etc. As a result, there is pressure to not be "MAGA" (perceived as racist). So, people who were formally conservativefor fiscal reasons (high earners who wanted low taxes) are now trending liberal for social reasons.

Again, not trying to debate the merits of any of these ideologies, just explaining the shift in the polling data for this demographic.

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

2023NCAggies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2023NCAggies
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So it really comes down to whether these pollsters, after nearly a decade of under predicting Trump support somehow are now accurate.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG




The Rasmussen crew also has a video out on the polling margins, but I haven't watched this yet.

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good poll for Trump; Napolitan (RMG).



Quote:

The latest Napolitan News national survey shows Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump tied at 49% (including leaners). This is the first time the candidates have been tied in our national polling since mid-August.

Since then, Harris has consistently maintained a very modest lead. Last week, Harris had a two point edge.

Harris leads by five among women while Trump has a six point advantage among men.

Harris leads by an astounding 30 points among voters with a postgraduate degree (64% to 34%). Trump leads among all other voters by six (52% to 46%). Harris' lead among postgraduates highlights some of the disparity between Elites and everyday Americans. The Napolitan Institute released a report today further highlighting other disparities between the Elite 1% and the rest of America.

A tie in the popular vote would likely lead to an Electoral College victory for Trump. A two-point popular vote victory by Harris would make the Electoral College race a toss-up.

Polling released yesterday showed Trump leading by four in Florida. Other recent Napolitan News surveys have shown close races in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. Trump has significant leads in Ohio and Montana.
Crosstabs make sense to me;
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2 week old poll is weird for them to release.
Quote:

The survey was conducted by The Tarrance Group, an experienced GOP opinion-taker in the Silver State, for the Democracy Defense Project, a bipartisan initiative dedicated to upholding the transparency, security and legitimacy of Nevada's elections. The poll surveyed 600 likely voters from throughout the state Sept. 16-19 via telephone and has a margin of error of 4.1 percentage points.

The poll also found that Harris leads Trump 47 percent to 44 percent, echoing a close race found in other recent polling. Four percent chose the unique Nevada option of "None of These Candidates," 4 percent were undecided and 1 percent chose a third-party candidate. Respondents also said they were more likely to distrust the American election system than Nevada's process.

Dave Sackett, partner at The Tarrance Group, the GOP pollster that conducted the survey, cautioned against placing too much faith in these results, especially given that the results fall within the margin of error and emphasizing that this is just a snapshot during that time period. Although the Democratic presidential candidate has won Nevada in the past four elections, the margin of victory has become increasingly smaller.

"There's just too much fluidity," Sackett said. "I think anybody who tells you that they know for certain
policywonk98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Always important to remember that only 35% of the adult population has a post secondary degree and the percentage is where it is because of the number of adult 24-35 that have degrees. The voting ages(40+) that experience much higher turnout is down in the 20% range of those with college degrees or higher.

The trick is getting the working population without degrees engaged. They are historically low voter turnout. But this is the demographic that has helped Trump beat the polling data. It's very hard for pollsters to create models with those voters at their proper levels of participation.
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Month old data but just published today

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I swear I can't understand the wild daily swings in this poll. Splain it to me Lucy!
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rockdoc said:

I swear I can't understand the wild daily swings in this poll. Splain it to me Lucy!
It is a smaller set of people polled, and the MOE is +/- 5 points. So even if it says he is up by 7, it could only be by 2.

Use it for trends, not necessarily daily numbers.
dirtylondrie712
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I just checked, and the final Rasmussen Poll for 2020 had Biden up by 1%. He ended up winning by more than that, but only because they run the score up in states like California and New York.

Either way, Rasmussen was closer than some of these other polls that had Biden by 8 or 10%.
JayM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rockdoc said:

I swear I can't understand the wild daily swings in this poll. Splain it to me Lucy!
Neither can I. The statistician types will say it is the little changes daily in the sampling technique. Because I'm thinking normal people aren't liable to change their opinions like a light switch.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JayM said:

Rockdoc said:

I swear I can't understand the wild daily swings in this poll. Splain it to me Lucy!
Neither can I. The statistician types will say it is the little changes daily in the sampling technique. Because I'm thinking normal people aren't liable to change their opinions like a light switch.
With such a small sample size each day, having your demographic split in that sample off by just a few people from day to day will produce large changes in the poll result, hence the large MOE. To get a better sense of where things really are, look at the trend over multiple days. The trend is consistently showing a several point Trump advantage, even if there are days here and there where Kamala is shown ahead.
YokelRidesAgain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dirtylondrie712 said:

I just checked, and the final Rasmussen Poll for 2020 had Biden up by 1%. He ended up winning by more than that, but only because they run the score up in states like California and New York.

Either way, Rasmussen was closer than some of these other polls that had Biden by 8 or 10%.
The final margin was Biden +4.5%. Predictions of +1 and +8 were equally bad.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No one should care about the national polls
jr15aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Philip J Fry said:

No one should care about the national polls

I tend to agree because of the inaccuracies... but funny enough... because a lot of these polls are consistently inaccurate, you can get good data by looking at their polls from previous elections.

It's particular interesting and entertaining this year because we can look at 2 previous election cycles of Trump vs. Democrat.
First Page Last Page
Page 106 of 165
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.