Makes me wonder if the problem is a bad batch of plugs due to a manufacturing error (they're made by either Spirit AeroSystems or one of their subcontractors), and/or poor installation at the factory. Bad batches do happen, I see it at my job every now and then. Thankfully for my company, its nothing more than an annoyance and not a danger to anyone.Kenneth_2003 said:The odd thing about this is that all of the 900ER are old enough that they would have already gone through an inspection cycle that would include removing all of the interior furnishings to enable a detailed inspection of the fuselage structure.tk for tu juan said:
Update door plug inspections extend out to 737-900ER variants since they share the door plug design with the 737-Max 9.
So any issues with the fasteners should have been caught during that inspection and any defects or shortcomings (if maintenance opened or removed the door plug) would there foreaward be on the carrier and their maintenance personnel; not on Boeing.
Also, since the 737 fuselage is made by Spirit AeroSystems in Wichita, I wonder if they install the plug there, or it gets installed later at the Boeing factory. Side note, pretty need to see a train hauling a bunch of 737 fuselages across the plains.
If the design of the plug was bad from the get go, then it would have manifested on the 737-900ERs a long time ago.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill