fka ftc said:
He has executive immunity to be claimed in the Georgia case.
In his official duties as POTUS, he has the responsibility to ensure a free and fair election and that all votes were counted.
If we are going back to how snowflakes in the world want to decipher intent on telephone calls, then we can do the Ukraine thing all over again.
But even if what he did was against the law, a sitting POTUS has complete immunity outside of impeachment process.
If Dems want to go forth on that, we will be at SCOTUS for a hearing on the future of the Republic.
You could be right. I just think that's the one case most likely to get a conviction of the 4 cases.
