ChatGPT again

25,782 Views | 296 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by TexAgs91
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If you haven't understood yet what the potential of ChatGPT has to change everything, another quantum leap in capability is coming very soon... plugins

The good news:
This give ChatGPT4 the ability to leverage plugins from other software and services. It can also access any data you provide to it and can accept and produce images.

This is an informative video that explains some of what can be done.


The not so good news:
4 months ago most people didn't know this existed. Since then there's been 2-3 quantum leaps in capability which will fundamentally change how many things will be done including eliminating many types of jobs, including new jobs where new businesses that were going to build applications based on ChatGPT won't even have a chance because you can now do all that in ChatGPT itself.

The bad news:
A revolutionary tool that has the potential to change everything is controlled by the political bias of the progressive globalists that developed it. At its core, AI is the ability to multiply the mind of its developers by a factor of a billion.

Anti-trust action for OpenAI is needed yesterday.
"Freedom is never more than one election away from extinction"
Fight! Fight! Fight!
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agree 100%.

The cat is out of the bag though.

Things are gonna get way out of control before we have an opportunity to reign it all in.
Post removed:
by user
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


From Ray Kurzweil, who predicted a Singularity which describes a point in the not to distant future where AI overtakes humanity...

Quote:

Kurzweil's core thesis, is a little thing called "the Law of Accelerating Returns."

That's why, to drive home the power of exponential growth, Kurzweil likes to use a folktale. Here's his explanation from the 2001 essay, "The Singularity is Near":

I am fond of telling the tale of the inventor of chess and his patron, the Emperor of China.

In response to the emperor's offer of a reward for his new beloved game, the inventor asked for a single grain of rice on the first square, two on the second square, four on the third, and so on. The Emperor quickly granted this seemingly benign and humble request.

One version of the story has the emperor going bankrupt as the 63 doublings ultimately totaled 18 million trillion grains of rice. At ten grains of rice per square inch, this requires rice fields covering twice the surface area of the Earth, oceans included. Another version of the story has the inventor losing his head.

Quote:

And it's only when a technology like a smartphone comes in and suddenly shifts our entire culture that we start to realize how quickly things are accelerating.

That's because, Kurzweil says, humans are linear by nature and technology is exponential.

Technology's relentless, predictable, and exponential growth will, according to the law of accelerating returns, bring humans into the era that Kurzweil is most closely associated with, the singularity.

"As exponential growth continues to accelerate into the first half of the twenty-first century," he writes. "It will appear to explode into infinity, at least from the limited and linear perspective of contemporary humans."

The singularity (or Singularity) is used to describe the era when artificial intelligence supplants human intelligence as the most-capable processing power around.

Quote:

Elon Musk has repeatedly said that we should be afraid of these high technologies. He's said that "with artificial intelligence we're summoning the demon," and that it poses the "biggest existential threat to humans."
link
"Freedom is never more than one election away from extinction"
Fight! Fight! Fight!
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Summoning a demon is right.

This **** is gonna get out of control before we even know what's happening.
bmks270
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You still have to build things and transport raw materials and energy to get things done.

Chat bot can't do that.

Chat not can help organize humans to do it though.

Gigem_94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bmks270 said:

You still have to build things and transport raw materials and energy to get things done.

Chat bot can't do that.

Chat not can help organize humans to do it though.



What about human slaves answering to their computer overlords that control flow of money and everything else?
CondensedFogAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?


It's a stunning piece of new technology no doubt. I was blown away, and use it in my job and everyday life. Very easy to summarize or respond to information, emails, etc.

That being said, when it's wrong, it can be really wrong, and will never know it's wrong unless a human corrects it.

Will it eliminate a ton of jobs? Maybe a few, but overall I don't really think so, as in the end a human has to validate, and oftentimes a single mistake can be extremely costly to a business.
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CondensedFogAggie said:



It's a stunning piece of new technology no doubt. I was blown away, and use it in my job and everyday life. Very easy to summarize or respond to information, emails, etc.

That being said, when it's wrong, it can be really wrong, and will never know it's wrong unless a human corrects it.

Will it eliminate a ton of jobs? Maybe a few, but overall I don't really think so, as in the end a human has to validate, and oftentimes a single mistake can be extremely costly to a business.
True, for now.

This is still basically an alpha version of it. Just look how far it is has come in a year. Give it another year. five years.

Yes, people will need to catch mistakes but it is going to streamline the hell out of so many processes. Which will increase efficiency in huge leaps. Increased efficiency, less humans in the loop. It is exact same thing we see in automation for past 3 generations. This will just apply to.....well, just about everything.

Humans will still need to work and fix and create. All the humans and processes that support THOSE humans though are going to face some major upheaval in the very near future.

I finally broke down myself and started implementing at my own work. Nothing crazy yet but it has already saved me at least a full days worth of research and study and learning and I think I have used it maybe four times now? For example I needed some code conversion and with about 8 mins of time and maybe about 6 prompting questions I had a functional code in a language I had never used before and will likely never look at again. It's not the most elegant or fastest but you know what? It works. So instead of poring through YouTube videos and trial and erroring I was able to crank out what I needed and move on with my life. That was both awesome....and a pretty sobering moment for me tbh.
ElKabong
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great segment with Elon & Joe

CondensedFogAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eliminatus said:




Yes, people will need to catch mistakes but it is going to streamline the hell out of so many processes. Which will increase efficiency in huge leaps. Increased efficiency, less humans in the loop. It is exact same thing we see in automation for past 3 generations. This will just apply to.....well, just about everything.

Humans will still need to work and fix and create. All the humans and processes that support THOSE humans though are going to face some major upheaval in the very near future.

I finally broke down myself and started implementing at my own work. Nothing crazy yet but it has already saved me at least a full days worth of research and study and learning and I think I have used it maybe four times now? For example I needed some code conversion and with about 8 mins of time and maybe about 6 prompting questions I had a functional code in a language I had never used before and will likely never look at again. It's not the most elegant or fastest but you know what? It works. So instead of poring through YouTube videos and trial and erroring I was able to crank out what I needed and move on with my life. That was both awesome....and a pretty sobering moment for me tbh.

Sure it will streamlines processes. But will it eliminate jobs, or will productivity expectations simply increase? I honestly don't know.

And yes, it speeds up the coding process yes, but the number of features to implement, bugs to fix are endless. Again I think productivity expectations will increase. And if all your competitors are using ChatGPT, well, the relative speed of work will remain the same.

In an industry where one line, one character can crash an entire data center either immediately or slowly, I highly doubt it'll significantly affect the number of jobs.
G. hirsutum Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Y'all are thinking about this too much. It's easy. In 10 years instead of saying "Hi, how are you?" we will instead say "Hi, what is a woman?" If the "person/app/business" can't give a precise answer then it's a bot and you go find another business. These machines will not be capable of answering these most basic questions and thusly we can use it as an easy litmus test
"Trust me, I'm a scientist"

"A liberal with a pen is a true weapon of mass destruction"
Nanomachines son
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Publishers have already stopped accepting unsolicited manuscripts and will likely only work through agents soon because the vast majority of what they are receiving now was written by AI.

They will have to add "verified to be human" to books very soon for anything new.
Nanomachines son
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

Summoning a demon is right.

This **** is gonna get out of control before we even know what's happening.


It already is, we're beyond the rubicon now. It's changing so fast I can barely keep up.
Dawnguard
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Even more incredible (and demon summoning) is that the ability to train it on your own library (read: biased to your worldview) is also just over the corner (it's already fairly common for images, but close for the language stuff).

We will have all out internet bot battles on forums with very little human input.

Wild time to be alive.
Nanomachines son
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dawnguard said:

Even more incredible (and demon summoning) is that the ability to train it on your own library (read: biased to your worldview) is also just over the corner (it's already fairly common for images, but close for the language stuff).

We will have all out internet bot battles on forums with very little human input.

Wild time to be alive.


How do I know you aren't a bot already? How do I prove that I am real myself? Makes you think.

Actually I know the answer, just tell the other poster to say a racist term and that will prove it. "I'm sorry I can't do that Dave."
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A LOT of white collar office workers can be replaced by this sort of AI

This will be the crisis for them that robots in manufacturing/exporting manufacturing to the 3rd world was for blue collar workers
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nanomachines son said:

Dawnguard said:

Even more incredible (and demon summoning) is that the ability to train it on your own library (read: biased to your worldview) is also just over the corner (it's already fairly common for images, but close for the language stuff).

We will have all out internet bot battles on forums with very little human input.

Wild time to be alive.


How do I know you aren't a bot already? How do I prove that I am real myself? Makes you think.

Actually I know the answer, just tell the other poster to say a racist term and that will prove it. "I'm sorry I can't do that Dave."


Lol that will be the key to discovering/short circuiting them: a logic problem where the only answer is to say something positive about a Republican
Trek Strategy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
Dawnguard said:

Even more incredible (and demon summoning) is that the ability to train it on your own library (read: biased to your worldview) is also just over the corner (it's already fairly common for images, but close for the language stuff).

We will have all out internet bot battles on forums with very little human input.

Wild time to be alive.
Most of what we already see is fake today, beyond what is directly in front of us. Anything coming from the TV, Internet, News Media is all paid for. It's a constructed world controlled by the most powerful ideologies designed for wealth and power.

Gen Z is craving authenticity like no other generation before her because of this. They know it's fake - that's the good news.

But I do believe that those in power will try to use this to create even more mass psychosis and gain more power. It's not headed in a good direction, even if we are waking up to it all.
Trek Strategy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
I'm a small business and I'm already thinking about how I use AI. If I don't, my competitors will and they will win the cost war. I used ChatGPT yesterday to write a contract clause. Saved me $400.
Old May Banker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Adverse Event
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Was at an appliance service training and chatgot got brought up for customer service templates and marketing by one of the service managers. The instructor lauded it, claimed it was changing the way everyone works and everyone in the class needed to learn how to use and maximize its potential for their business.

Separately, I posted in another chstgot thread that a gentleman has figured out how to make their own chatgpt3.5, completely unlocked, for about 5-600$ depending on how much data you train it on. It's a Cambrian explosion from there.

Separately, Bing has connected theirs to the internet and now you can source and derive live information from Gpt...

Times are changing ****ING FAST
What bitcoin’s detractors don’t understand is monetary economics, computer science, software engineering, network protocols, and electrical systems.

It ain't much, but it's honest Proof of Work.
Serotonin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'll wait to hear Paul Krugman's opinion on this new technology before I form my opinion (which will be the opposite).
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm gonna get a Texags GPTChat account that just praises Trump 24/7. Think of all the glorious F16 stars!

Also, once a week, I'll have it start a Texit/Civil War thread. It will soon become the most popular F16 poster on here.
Nanomachines son
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trek Strategy said:

I'm a small business and I'm already thinking about how I use AI. If I don't, my competitors will and they will win the cost war. I used ChatGPT yesterday to write a contract clause. Saved me $400.


Been telling people at work that if we don't start using this then we're all going to get run over by a train soon enough. We have no choice, it's either adapt or die.
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Person Not Capable of Pregnancy
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Frightening. Hopefully, people will design these plug-ins so they can somehow override the inherent wokeness that the first programmers included.

No idea if that's possible though.
Serotonin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Watch out though, you can still get into trouble:
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GeorgiAg said:

I'm gonna get a Texags GPTChat account that just praises Trump 24/7. Think of all the glorious F16 stars!

Also, once a week, I'll have it start a Texit/Civil War thread. It will soon become the most popular F16 poster on here.


add a plug-in where one bot claims to be lifelong conservative but is just SOOO Concerned about the lack of Moderation in the GOP that they have no choice but to goalie for Dems on every single topic.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Adverse Event said:

Separately, I posted in another chstgot thread that a gentleman has figured out how to make their own chatgpt3.5, completely unlocked, for about 5-600$ depending on how much data you train it on. It's a Cambrian explosion from there.
Yeah, that's Llama & Alpaca. That gives me some hope that it won't be one company controlling it all. They've used ChatGPT to train their own dataset for only $600 vs the millions OpenAI spent training theirs. And yes, it somehow seems to be free of the bias ChatGPT has even though it was trained by ChatGPT.
"Freedom is never more than one election away from extinction"
Fight! Fight! Fight!
whytho987654
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We are in the AI hype phase right now, there will still be a need for professionals. Now the paper pushers at mid or entry-level jobs making high 5 figures low 6 are in trouble
Adverse Event
How long do you want to ignore this user?
See my above post. Unlocked versions exist in the wild for less than 600$, DIY
What bitcoin’s detractors don’t understand is monetary economics, computer science, software engineering, network protocols, and electrical systems.

It ain't much, but it's honest Proof of Work.
Johnny04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What's the cost of the $600 cover? Cloud computing resources?
Adverse Event
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For the first time in my tech watching experience.... the hype is being outpaced by the actual use cases and adoption. It's terrifyingly amazing to watch.
What bitcoin’s detractors don’t understand is monetary economics, computer science, software engineering, network protocols, and electrical systems.

It ain't much, but it's honest Proof of Work.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Adverse Event said:

See my above post. Unlocked versions exist in the wild for less than 600$, DIY
Good news.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.