January 6th hoax

31,405 Views | 379 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by nortex97
AGHouston11
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxTarpon • 11:09a, 3/7/23
AG
TxTarpon said:

Quote:
I've worked for Troy. This excerpt has nothing to do with the tea in China.
We are not talking Chinese tea.
Quote:
Answer: it was an orchestrated gas lit event by the democrat party and ABC agencies to make trump look bad.
Great!
So why did Troy defend the building against a gaslight hoax of nonviolent protesters?
There was nothing to defend, they were nonviolent, he should have opened the door, right?
And he was misquoted too?



What Troy should do assuming he's never seen the video and has been under a rock - is he should be asking why the flag pole guy was being lead around by police! It's actually probably good he didn't just shoot as it's possible a Capitol police officer may actually been shot as they were escorting flag pole guy around ! - by him!

Before Ashley Babbit was shot at the window someone gave the order for police or whoever they were to leave the door they were blocking! Had that never happened and there never left she likely would never had been shot. But makes you wonder why they were told to leave but the one officer on the other side of the door was ready to shoot ……..
Reply Quote
7
1 edit
annie88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 80sGeorge • 11:09a, 3/7/23
AG
80sGeorge said:
No honest person can deny it


And that explains why the Democrats keep lying on both counts.
Reply Quote
22
annie88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 11:16a, 3/7/23
AG
nortex97 said:
safelightKL said:
Why didn't Trump pardon all J6 protestors? He had the authority. He certainly had time to pardon Lil' Wayne and Kodak Black.
I agree with this. Both his refusal to fire/call out Fauci et al. About Fauci Flu and handling of pardons are…unpardonable errors, imho.


All the major health organizations and government agencies were lying to him and the American people about Covid. Every damn one.

He tried to push back several times and got accused of trying to kill Americans. He never wore a mask except for when in Walter Reed, and he left it up to the states to decide.

When you think that government agencies were actually claiming to help people instead of literally trying to control and hurt them what was he supposed to do?

Other than axing Fauci earlier, which would've brought on the biggest **** storm we've ever seen, but he still should've done, if you're being lied to even as president it's a lose-lose situation.

I'm sure he would do it differently now if he could.
Reply Quote
10
AGHouston11
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to annie88 • 11:18a, 3/7/23
AG
annie88 said:
80sGeorge said:
No honest person can deny it


And that explains why the Democrats keep lying on both counts.


Chuck Schumer on the floor speaking today saying anything other than an insurrection is a lie! Saying everyone has abreast seen that it was an insurrection. Saying that Fox should not show any more video!

I'm sure all the Republicans will demand he be truthful and they will be outraged………

Nope because most are on his side and were on the the 6th!
Reply Quote
4
annie88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AGHouston11 • 11:21a, 3/7/23
AG
AGHouston11 said:
annie88 said:
80sGeorge said:
No honest person can deny it


And that explains why the Democrats keep lying on both counts.


Chuck Schumer on the floor speaking today saying anything other than an insurrection is a lie! Saying everyone has abreast seen that it was an insurrection. Saying that Fox should not show any more video!

I'm sure all the Republicans will demand he be truthful and they will be outraged………

Nope because most are on his side and were on the the 6th!


I wouldn't say most but more than comfortable for the Republican side.

And there's a reason they don't want more video shown because it's breaking up their narrative.

The fact that he doesn't want it shown should tell even stupid Democrats and libs how jacked up this thing is, but it wont, and it's mostly lies.

If you're sure of the truth, then you don't mind it being shown. Democrats are just scum.
Reply Quote
16
Maroon Dawn
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:22a, 3/7/23
AG
"The video definitely proves our view is correct but we can't let anyone see it and it needs to be sealed away for 50 years!"

-People who definitely are telling the truth and have nothing to hide
Reply Quote
18
2 edits
Science Denier
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AGHouston11 • 11:28a, 3/7/23
AG
AGHouston11 said:
IndividualFreedom said:
I really just want an apology from democrat politicians. Sorry we imprisoned you with slow trials and false imprisonment. Same goes for wuhan.



Why just democrats? GOP was fine with the false narrative and those that might have not been never had the backbone to speak up about it.

Anyone know of harsh comments made by DeSantis on this whole event ? I have not seen them.

Crenshaw helped the false narrative of the Capitol police officer that was not killed by protesters! Anyone heard him denounce this false narrative!

Ted Cruz at least walked back his domestic terrorists comments but even he was too willing to go along with the false narrative!

McConnell and McCarthy were perfectly fine with the false narrative!

Nikki Haley and Trey Gowdy spent an entire radio show trashing Trump for what he caused on Jan 6! Nothing negative on the democrats!

I expect the democrats to be the lying leftists they have become ! What's apparent now is how much the GOP are in it with them! Worse are the alphabets!
Did any of those people know that the government lied? How can they say anything other than the investigation is a sham and a political witch hunt, which they did if they are not privy to the info?

Now, we are all privy to the info and I would be shocked if they now don't have a rather strong opinion.
LOL OLD
Reply Quote
4
Funky Winkerbean
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:31a, 3/7/23
AG
Anyone trusting anything coming from this administration is a fool of the highest order. It's an adolescent dog and pony show. Be better CM's.
Reply Quote
11
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nai06 • 11:31a, 3/7/23
nai06 said:
Did tucker also mention the Jacob Chansley left a note for pence that said "It's only a matter of time. Justice is coming."


Or did he bring up the fact that Chansley actually pled guilty to his charges?
Unfortunately, in the case of Jacob Chansley justice was not coming only the wanton disregard for our Constitution on full display by the Democratic Party leadership.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
7
jja79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:31a, 3/7/23
AG
Why was this released to someone we all knew would raise the temperature on the left? Why wasn't there some sort of actual house committee investigating the J6 committee to include this footage? I have believed from day 1 it was a set up but releasing it to Carlson really just fans the flames of division. Maybe that was the goal.
Reply Quote
Bobaloo
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:32a, 3/7/23
Chuck U is *****ing....Tucker must be hovering over the target.
Reply Quote
12
CanyonAg77
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jja79 • 11:38a, 3/7/23
AG
jja79 said:
Why was this released to someone we all knew would raise the temperature on the left? Why wasn't there some sort of actual house committee investigating the J6 committee to include this footage? I have believed from day 1 it was a set up but releasing it to Carlson really just fans the flames of division. Maybe that was the goal.

The goal was to never release it and keep using Jan 6 as a tool to bash the right.
Reply Quote
16
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiez03 • 11:39a, 3/7/23
aggiez03

Your post is eye opening and should be read by everyone.

You bring facts that are completely ignored by certain posters that either do not care about facts ,or worse, know the facts but are hell bent on the destruction of the Constitution and the individual rights and privileges granted it guarantees.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
4
jja79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to CanyonAg77 • 11:41a, 3/7/23
AG
Of course but now there's a Republican speaker. I'm wondering why he went this route with it since everyone had to know would further add to the division in the country. Again, that might have been the goal.
Reply Quote
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiez03 • 11:43a, 3/7/23
aggiez03

another brutal list of the truth that will be ignored by certain posters.

Thank you for the information.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
3
Ag87H2O
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxTarpon • 11:46a, 3/7/23
AG
TxTarpon said:

Quote:
I've worked for Troy. This excerpt has nothing to do with the tea in China.
We are not talking Chinese tea.
Quote:
Answer: it was an orchestrated gas lit event by the democrat party and ABC agencies to make trump look bad.
Great!
So why did Troy defend the building against a gaslight hoax of nonviolent protesters?
There was nothing to defend, they were nonviolent, he should have opened the door, right?

And he was misquoted too?

There is a distinct possibility that he was speaking to establishment operatives, not just some crowd of random protesters. He wasn't defending anything.

It was his first official day on the job. He hadn't learned yet how devious and underhanded the left can be, or aware of all of the events that led up to that moment.
Reply Quote
5
1 edit
Squadron7
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:49a, 3/7/23
AG
Did this guy's defense team have access to this footage?
Reply Quote
1
Tom Kazansky 2012
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxTarpon • 11:50a, 3/7/23
AG
TxTarpon said:

Quote:
I've worked for Troy. This excerpt has nothing to do with the tea in China.
We are not talking Chinese tea.
Quote:
Answer: it was an orchestrated gas lit event by the democrat party and ABC agencies to make trump look bad.
Great!
So why did Troy defend the building against a gaslight hoax of nonviolent protesters?
There was nothing to defend, they were nonviolent, he should have opened the door, right?
And he was misquoted too?



Defend the building? Read his book? He kept a door locked and told people to go away.

Why are y'all trying to blow this up to epic proportions?

Reply Quote
3
Tom Kazansky 2012
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:50a, 3/7/23
AG



Pigs are squealing.
Reply Quote
25
MouthBQ98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AGHouston11 • 11:51a, 3/7/23
AG
AGHouston11 said:
annie88 said:
80sGeorge said:
No honest person can deny it


And that explains why the Democrats keep lying on both counts.


Chuck Schumer on the floor speaking today saying anything other than an insurrection is a lie! Saying everyone has abreast seen that it was an insurrection. Saying that Fox should not show any more video!

I'm sure all the Republicans will demand he be truthful and they will be outraged………

Nope because most are on his side and were on the the 6th!


I really despise that evil self serving *******.
Reply Quote
14
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Squadron7 • 11:52a, 3/7/23
AG
Squadron7 said:
Did this guy's defense team have access to this footage?
Likely not. There were a lot of complaints from attorneys that they were not being afforded access to any other video from that day, other than what the prosecution was willing to show them. Became a Brady issue.
Reply Quote
13
pdc093
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:54a, 3/7/23
Unreal....

Quote:
Justice Dept. arrests hit 1,000 in connection with Jan. 6, and new accusations surface in latest prosecutions
The Justice Department has reached a milestone in its prosecution of the U.S. Capitol attack, confirming it has arrested at least 1,000 people in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the Capitol, nearly half of whom still face the prospect of trials or plea agreements.

A new wave of cases, many of which involve higher-level charges of assaults against police, continues to expand a prosecution that is already the largest in American history.

Twenty-six months into the criminal investigation, the newest cases continue to reveal new details and evidence about alleged criminal activity amid the riotous mob.
Slightly more than half of the men and women charged with federal crimes in the Jan. 6 attack have entered guilty pleas in their cases. But even as cases close, new defendants and charges continue to surface, which could stretch the overall prosecution well into 2024, if not beyond.
In its latest update, the Justice Department said the FBI is seeking to identify at least 260 more people wanted in the attack.


The Justice Department has secured a nearly unblemished record in Capitol riot trials over the first two years of prosecutions. Only one defendant, a New Mexico man who requested a bench trial with no jury and a verdict rendered by a judge was fully acquitted.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/brian-sicknick-family-statement-tucker-carlson-fox-news-january-6-2021-attack/

No end in sight....
Reply Quote
6
AgBandsman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to McKinney Ag69 • 11:54a, 3/7/23
AG
McKinney Ag69 said:
So basically the 2020 election was stolen through voter fraud in major metro areas of swing states and January 6th was a set up to discredit those wanting transparency and an audit. As I suspected all along for the last two years...

Thanks for confirming Tucker!



https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/bombshell-j6-video-knab/
Yet we still have Desantis apologists that think he can beat the Leftist voting machine in 2024.

Blows my mind. Trump didn't lose because he is unlikable or because he was a bad candidate. He (and Desantis or any R) will lose in 2024 if they espouse a true conservative agenda challenging the ones really running our country against the will of the people.
Reply Quote
10
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ghost of Andrew Eaton • 11:55a, 3/7/23
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
They could have led him around. Or they didn't have the manpower to arrest him at the moment and so just followed him around.
Bull tacos

and to top is off Pelosi refused a request to provide more law enforcement and national guard.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
6
Ag87H2O
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Tom Kazansky 2012 • 11:58a, 3/7/23
AG
Tom Kazansky 2012 said:



Pigs are squealing.
"...cherrypicking from thousands of hours of video ..."

Yes, that's exactly what the January 6 committee did. Schumer is a Grade A lying dirtbag trying to divert attention from the truth. Their narrative is being shattered and they do not like it.
Reply Quote
19
spikingag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:02p, 3/7/23
AG
A wise man shall never be conquered by a deceitful false prophet; but fools and simple minds shall revere the prophet as they would a deity." RJ Intindola

https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020-9
Reply Quote
1
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nai06 • 12:03p, 3/7/23
nai06 said:
Has Chansley or his lawyer ever claimed that they were denied access to this footage? I certainly haven't seen that. This footage also doesn't exonerate him from the crimes he was charged with.
I guess you missed this post
6:39a

and the fact that there was at least 40,000 hours of video. So an individual with limited financial means will have a large team of lawyers and investigators to peruse through at minimum 40,000 hours of video?
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
7
Squadron7
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AgBandsman • 12:04p, 3/7/23
AG
Quote:
Yet we still have Desantis apologists...

Pray tell, what are we apologizing for again?
Reply Quote
3
Tom Kazansky 2012
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:08p, 3/7/23
AG
Reply Quote
8
Tom Kazansky 2012
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:12p, 3/7/23
AG
Quote:
It bears repeating that Jan 6th was a completely fake psy-op to retcon the preceding 12 months of utter lawlessness perpetrated by Red Guard shock troops across the country, and fabricate a narrative end-point to justify the many breaches big and small to the public trust and our basic civic compact undertaken during the entirety of the Trump presidencyfrom Russiagate, to election "fortification," to race riots...all of itin order to undermine the possibility of a Trump re-election and forever kill any kind of viable right wing populist movement, and as stupid and transparent as the psyop isjust watch the video belowit is now being written into the "official historical record" as "The Greatest Attack on Our Democracy in a Century, an actual Insurrection," and even if, especially if, you style yourself a "serious and smart conservative intellectual," though you fell for this stupid ruse from the jump, it is okay to name it for what it is and swallow your "serious and smart conservative intellectual" pretensions for two seconds to, god forbid, throw your weight behind the Shaman and the Q crowd, who may be beneath your high-minded self-regard, but nonetheless are the only coalition who will ever provide even the slimmest possibility of achieving the political outcomes you ostensibly want and are deserving of a proper and accurate accounting of what actually happened.
Reply Quote
10
CanyonAg77
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jja79 • 12:24p, 3/7/23
AG
jja79 said:
Of course but now there's a Republican speaker. I'm wondering why he went this route with it since everyone had to know would further add to the division in the country. Again, that might have been the goal.

You reveal crimes because people have the right to know when the government is corrupt

If that divides the country against the corrupt, I'm good with that
Reply Quote
17
BluHorseShu
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Beast of Burden • 12:55p, 3/7/23
AG
Beast of Burden said:
BluHorseShu said:
Ellis Wyatt said:
nai06 said:
Did tucker also mention the Jacob Chansley left a note for pence that said "It's only a matter of time. Justice is coming."


Or did he bring up the fact that Chansley actually pled guilty to his charges?
People are coerced to plead all the time. Particularly when their civil rights are denied. That's why our constitution is supposed to guarantee it doesn't happen.
So is this the standard we can use for anyone who pleads guilty? Or just the ones we want to really believe are innocent? I'm just trying to gauge a consistent standard.


That's all you've got? Seriously? Tell the board, again, how you're really conservative.

Well, I guess if bad arguments are cool...and I'm proposing something more substantive...then yes, that's all I got. I guess to be considered a conservative here, you just have to agree with the circle jerk about everything. Noted.
Reply Quote
1
TxTarpon
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AGHouston11 • 12:56p, 3/7/23

Quote:
What Troy should do assuming he's never seen the video and has been under a rock - is he should be asking why the flag pole guy was being lead around by police!
Yep.
Quote:
But makes you wonder why they were told to leave but the one officer on the other side of the door was ready to shoot ……..
Had Bin Laden known how easy it was to get int there, in 2001 we might have had a very different 9/11 terrorist event. After 15 years and trillions spent on the WOT, there was not a "We need help immediately" button and protocol? As kookie as Coach Popovich is, he did say "You don't get into secure places without a wink and a nod." As you accurately noted, that seems to be the case.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
TAMU1990
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to maroonthrunthru • 12:59p, 3/7/23
AG
maroonthrunthru said:
My brother-in-law is a pretty prominent criminal defense attorney…

Per his description of this case, Chansley had no shot of winning this case in DC… The Govt and the media stacked the case against him…

It was trial by media, and he was the scapegoat du jour…

According to my BIL, he did the smart thing by pleading guilty…

Because of this video, we see he was no terrorist, just a wacky guy who the Govt pounced on to embarrass 45…

Chansley has a pretty good chance of release, and a pardon via the next Republican POTUS….

Wouldn't want to have to endure what he went through, but after all is said and done, he'll probably be OK financially…

Heck, I'll contribute to his GoFundMe…
If Chansley is set free it would be the ultimate dagger to the Dem narrative. This guy was the face of Jan 6. Even people who never watched a minute of coverage on Jan 6 know who this guy is. I see the Dems fighting to the death to prevent that. I hope they lose and suffer a significant blow to their narratives.
Reply Quote
7
1 edit
TxTarpon
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag87H2O • 1:01p, 3/7/23

Quote:
There is a distinct possibility that he was speaking to establishment operatives, not just some crowd of random protesters. He wasn't defending anything.
He was defending the house chamber.
It is all documented.
What is he doing here? Pole vaulting practice in a mask?


Reply Quote
3 edits
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.