Russia/Ukraine from Another Perspective (Relaunch Part Deux)

606,624 Views | 9883 Replies | Last: 11 hrs ago by nortex97
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You've sure picked up your posting since the end of July. What is your precise question? The desperation was not the folks in/around Kursk but the other, real battle front.

I guess it depends, as far as the Kursk offensive, what the goal was? Was it to generate positive press? Then it's a great success. Was it to generate meaningful battlefield gains/shifts from the Russians? Then no, not a success. Losing several of their best remaining brigades (including personnel and gear like Strykers etc) in a feint into Russia would be considered a win by the Russians I would guess. HTH.
girlfriend_experience
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

You've sure picked up your posting since the end of July. What is your precise question? The desperation was not the folks in/around Kursk but the other, real battle front.

I guess it depends, as far as the Kursk offensive, what the goal was? Was it to generate positive press? Then it's a great success. Was it to generate meaningful battlefield gains/shifts from the Russians? Then no, not a success. Losing several of their best remaining brigades (including personnel and gear like Strykers etc) in a feint into Russia would be considered a win by the Russians I would guess. HTH.


Not sure what my posting habits have to do with the topic at hand ? Thanks for the response though
MJ20/20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Based on the limited information and accuracy of information, this reeks of a rope a dope manuever by the Russians. Angling the favorable terrain and Ukraine's willingness to continually devote upper tier personnel and equipment (along with some feaux momentum) to eventually deliver a devestating blow.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
girlfriend_experience said:

nortex97 said:

Wow.



Meanwhile;



Concluding bit:
Quote:

Why did the AFU command go with this desperate gamble? After all, these were their reserves. Russian troops in the Donbass seem to have gotten a "go order" today and made significant gains (particularly in the ever-growing Ocheretino Salient) with seemingly little effort, likely aware the Ukrainian reserve pool is bottoming out. Well, it's simple - as I explained at length earlier, the status quo of the war favors Russia. If things continued, the AFU would gradually be strangled to death in the Donbass and the war would end on Putin's terms. They needed to change the game and an "off-axis" attack offered the chance to achieve shocking success and bring Putin to the table on Zelensky's terms... if things worked out.
Pretty crazy strategy/plan, imho. Meanwhile, Zelensky the green openly talks about a referendum to cede the lost lands officially, so he can just concede to the 'will of the people.' Maybe, just maybe…he should also consider holding at least a Venezuelan style election. I don't know why there is some notion that a referendum would be acceptable but an election just too much amidst the war.
did I read it wrong the guy on that twiiter post pretty much said UKE offensive is a failure?
Yes.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

You've sure picked up your posting since the end of July. What is your precise question? The desperation was not the folks in/around Kursk but the other, real battle front.

I guess it depends, as far as the Kursk offensive, what the goal was? Was it to generate positive press? Then it's a great success. Was it to generate meaningful battlefield gains/shifts from the Russians? Then no, not a success. Losing several of their best remaining brigades (including personnel and gear like Strykers etc) in a feint into Russia would be considered a win by the Russians I would guess. HTH.
Any evidence this has occurred?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
See the Russian MoD statement of Ukrainian losses. Not the full 3-4 brigades yet, but now they are altogether exposed to various direct/indirect fires. How can they protect themselves in that salient? Any notional element of surprise is gone, if it existed. Even some Ukrainians have called out the folly per simplicius' sitrep 2 days ago:

Quote:

The Ukrainian Armed Forces are in a very difficult situation and risk running out of resources! - Butusov on the dangerous offensive in the Kursk region
Ukrainian propagandist - editor-in-chief of "Censor.net" Yu. Butusov doubts the advisability of an offensive on the Kursk region in the context of the difficult situation for the Ukrainian Armed Forces in other parts of the front.
"I don't have all the information, but if we have started to attack somewhere, then we should hope that the Supreme Commander-in-Chief's Headquarters has taken the necessary measures to strengthen the defense of Mirnograd, Chasy Yar, Toretsk and New York, important cities where fighting is currently taking place, with reserves. This means that ammunition is being concentrated there in the near future, reliable lines are being built, the use of drones and electronic warfare is being improved," Butusov writes, hinting that none of this has been done.
After all, without organizing a permanent defense in the strategic directions of the offensive of the RF Armed Forces and without destroying the combat capability of strike groups, "there is a risk of exhausting our reserves and then not having anything to counter new attacks with."
"As it happened in 2023, when our reserves were exhausted, which led to the loss of Avdiivka," he writes.
Again, I know 'success' can be defined differently, yet I think this is an unforced error for/by the Ukrainians, myself. It may actually be 4 brigades, and these have been/are considered their 'elite' ones by all I have read, but there is a lot of skepticism about 'Kharkiv 2.0.'



But I admit to enjoying playing devil's advocate, and they are apparently 20 or 30 km from the Kursk NPP (nuke plant) so that could provide some 'fire works.'
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

See the Russian MoD statement of Ukrainian losses. Not the full 3-4 brigades yet, but now they are altogether exposed to various direct/indirect fires. How can they protect themselves in that salient? Any notional element of surprise is gone, if it existed. Even some Ukrainians have called out the folly per simplicius' sitrep 2 days ago:

Quote:

The Ukrainian Armed Forces are in a very difficult situation and risk running out of resources! - Butusov on the dangerous offensive in the Kursk region
Ukrainian propagandist - editor-in-chief of "Censor.net" Yu. Butusov doubts the advisability of an offensive on the Kursk region in the context of the difficult situation for the Ukrainian Armed Forces in other parts of the front.
"I don't have all the information, but if we have started to attack somewhere, then we should hope that the Supreme Commander-in-Chief's Headquarters has taken the necessary measures to strengthen the defense of Mirnograd, Chasy Yar, Toretsk and New York, important cities where fighting is currently taking place, with reserves. This means that ammunition is being concentrated there in the near future, reliable lines are being built, the use of drones and electronic warfare is being improved," Butusov writes, hinting that none of this has been done.
After all, without organizing a permanent defense in the strategic directions of the offensive of the RF Armed Forces and without destroying the combat capability of strike groups, "there is a risk of exhausting our reserves and then not having anything to counter new attacks with."
"As it happened in 2023, when our reserves were exhausted, which led to the loss of Avdiivka," he writes.
Again, I know 'success' can be defined differently, yet I think this is an unforced error for/by the Ukrainians, myself. It may actually be 4 brigades, and these have been/are considered their 'elite' ones by all I have read, but there is a lot of skepticism about 'Kharkiv 2.0.'



But I admit to enjoying playing devil's advocate, and they are apparently 20 or 30 km from the Kursk NPP (nuke plant) so that could provide some 'fire works.'
Pardon me if I don't believe the Russian MoD. They're known for issuing false propaganda.
AtticusMatlock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, because the Russians have so demonstrated the ability to be completely brilliant during this entire 3-day operation.

OPAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Pardon me if I don't believe the Russian MoD. They're known for issuing false propaganda.
But you believe the Uke's!!!!!
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OPAG said:

Quote:

Pardon me if I don't believe the Russian MoD. They're known for issuing false propaganda.
But you believe the Uke's!!!!!
Let's just say, I know things that show the Russian MoD is incorrect.

I can't tell you how I know this, though.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Coming up on 3-years of this war with no end in sight.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

Coming up on 3-years of this war with no end in sight.
Well, Russia could leave.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't think it's as far off as it seems at first glance.


Sitrep: last-gasp Ardenne offensive?
Quote:

In short: it's a text book assault, with nothing bad that can be said about it. Ukraine chose a region that was a soft underbelly and accumulated a force disparity against a bunch of nearly defenseless Russian border guards and conscripts. However, as soon as Ukrainian forces began incurring, they were hit mercilessly from Russia's fire-strike-complex.

What's remarkable is that besides the first border checkpoint capture of Russian troops, Ukrainian units have posted nearly no other Russian losses whatsoever. Russians on the other hand have now posted a verifiable dozens of destroyed armored vehicles of all types.

Yesterday, Russian MOD claimed over 600 manpower losses for the AFU already. Even if we assume this number is exaggerated, the MOD's vehicular losses was something in the 60-80 region, which is mostly in line with verified losses. So, if they didn't lie about the vehicle hits, why would they lie about the manpower number?

Quote:

If this is really the case, then that means this may be Ukraine's final big hurrah offensive, the one they had been saving up for a long time as their last needle-moving attempt to affect "coming negotiations". If these brigades are recklessly thrown away in the same way that the 10th and 11th Corps were done during the Zaporozhye '23 offensive, then the fat lady may sing for the AFU as a whole, as there will be no reserves left, particularly to contain Russia's coming breakthroughs in the Donbass direction.


In short, the Kursk offensive was well coordinated with EW, drones, and a large task force of relatively elite forces/units, yet the first 20 km etc. were not Russian reserves but border guards, the main Russian reserves north being placed outside of MLRS/ATACM etc. range. I expect more rapid movement of the Russians forward in the Donbas/Donetsk areas etc. this year and elimination of this pocket, because the Ukrainians now have nothing left to provide for their desperate front line units by way of reserves/fresh troops. And, critically, the Russians didn't have to transfer any significant forces from the east/south to put down this incursion.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waiting for war reporter footage of the remote control guy:
X was born on October 28, 2022 and should be a national holiday.
OPAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Let's just say, I know things that show the Russian MoD is incorrect.

I can't tell you how I know this, though.
And I can say with even more confidence that the UKE MoD is incorrect.

And I can tell you how I know this, through contact I have in the theater. LOL
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OPAG said:

Quote:

Let's just say, I know things that show the Russian MoD is incorrect.

I can't tell you how I know this, though.
And I can say with even more confidence that the UKE MoD is incorrect.

And I can tell you how I know this, through contact I have in the theater. LOL
Your Russian friend isn't telling you the truth.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Small Zelensky oopsie
"They attacked civilians"
*posts pictures of camo military vehicles*
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Not surprised at all. Downtown Kiev has been left alone quite deliberately. I would expect the remaining power transmission/generation infrastructure to be hit/decimated, in quick order now.

This will be an interesting evening/overnight period.



Ukrainian Black Sea attacks halted. As well, Nuland-style coup warned of in Serbia.
OPAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Your Russian friend isn't telling you the truth.
Ah that would be wrong! LOL
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OPAG said:

Quote:

Your Russian friend isn't telling you the truth.
Ah that would be wrong! LOL
I completely believe you.
OPAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I completely believe you.
And why does what you believe matter at all? As I said, it really doesn't matter what you believe or don't believe. it has zero impact on the truth.

Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OPAG said:

Quote:

I completely believe you.
And why does what you believe matter at all? As I said, it really doesn't matter what you believe or don't believe. it has zero impact on the truth.


Then why do you keep responding to me?

I have my information.

It says the Russian MoD has been lying.
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:



Not surprised at all. Downtown Kiev has been left alone quite deliberately. I would expect the remaining power transmission/generation infrastructure to be hit/decimated, in quick order now.

This will be an interesting evening/overnight period.



Ukrainian Black Sea attacks halted. As well, Nuland-style coup warned of in Serbia.


The people of Ukraine can and will continue to thank Putin for everything they've had to endure as a result of his invasion since every part of this is 100% his responsibility. No matter what his social media mouthpieces claim.

Of course, thanks to Ukraine's retaliation, his own people now have something to blame him for too.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stating your opinion like it's fact wont make it true.

It is your opinion that no one else has any culpability here, plenty of rational people disagree.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What effort has been made to negotiate an end of this war over the past 2.75 years?

There were meetings in Belarus

There were meetings in Turkey.

Mexico submitted a peace plan to the UN.

Elon Musk proposed his own plan on Twitter.

There was a peace summit at the UN.

Brazil proposes a plan.

Indonesia proposes a plan.

Saudi Arabia hosted talks.

Hungary and Orban trying to negotiate an end.

China had its own plan.

All global resources have been thrown at this problem and have failed. Now the war in Ukraine coming up on it's third year with no end in sight.
AlaskanAg99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Russians don't want peace. So they're stalling and/or making unrealistic demands.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

What effort has been made to negotiate an end of this war over the past 2.75 years?

There were meetings in Belarus

There were meetings in Turkey.

Mexico submitted a peace plan to the UN.

Elon Musk proposed his own plan on Twitter.

There was a peace summit at the UN.

Brazil proposes a plan.

Indonesia proposes a plan.

Saudi Arabia hosted talks.

Hungary and Orban trying to negotiate an end.

China had its own plan.

All global resources have been thrown at this problem and have failed. Now the war in Ukraine coming up on it's third year with no end in sight.
Putin won't leave until he's forced to leave or he thinks he's got all he can get FOR NOW. The only way to stop what happens AFTER NOW is for Ukraine to join NATO.

There will be no serious negotiations until Putin's ball are in a vice.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Putin's view is that he's taking a stand against the new world-order. So thats ultimately what it boils down to, Imo.

If this conflict is to be ended by negotiation it would've been done already.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We may see this thing play out to the end. No off-ramp in sight.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sounds like the Russians continue to advance around New York and the Ardenne Kursk offensive has stabilized, notably the Russians retook Sudzha. Ukrainian navy loses a couple boats.



There is, per above discussion/posts, speculation that this means Putin will have to push through to total surrender.




There won't be negotiations because Zelensky the wonderful mad man is simply delusional:
Quote:

Therefore, Zelensky is confident that time is playing on the side of Ukraine in the war - as Orban wrote in a letter to EU leaders after meeting with the Ukrainian president. A source in diplomatic circles informed Strana about the existence of such a letter.

"As for the outcome of the war, the President of Ukraine is confident that the Russian armed forces will be forced to resort to general mobilization in the middle of next year, which will lead to internal destabilization. He believes that the Ukrainian forces are stable, prepared and able to maintain combat effectiveness even in the long term, if Western arms supplies continue. He believes that time is on the side of Ukraine, not on the side of Russia," the letter says.
Yeah, Russia will depose Putin and then a surrender caucus will somehow take over in Moscow. Great plan there, Z, while stripping your forces at the main front of even more reserves/ammo/fighting capacity. Yermak, Zelensky's brain, currently sees no point at all in direct negotiations with Russia. He wants to convince regime supporters that Ukraine can win:
Quote:

"We are working today both with people from the team of candidate Donald Trump, and even before the nomination with Vice President Kamala Harris, who is already a candidate from the Democratic Party. It is very important for us that both headquarters, both candidates and those around them clearly understand what is happening in Ukraine, that they clearly understand the current stage of the war and our strategy. I believe it is very important that both candidates have a plan for Ukraine's victory," he said.
We will see how long the bridges across the Dnieper remain up.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gonna post this link as it is an accurate, hilarious, imho, if highly profane (caution, if one is a sensitive person prone to being offended) summation of the situation in/around Ukraine/Russia right now. Ukrainian recruiters trying to kidnap a retired American NCO, and failing made me laugh too.

Concluding tweet:
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Supposedly a T-62 captured in Kursk. Of note, if true, is that there's an airborne unit insignia painted on it, meaning even Russia's elite units are now equipped with sixty year old relics.

Or maybe it's just for funsies like Walz and his SF hat. Either way, it's telling that Russia is countering an invasion with this crap, not just using it in meat assaults in Ukraine.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A lot of this gets into silly comparisons, imho, but most of the Ukrainian tank corps such as it is remains, are upgraded T-64's, so not a big deal, even if true. The main issue with the -62 in a territorial defense posture is just that it has a smaller cannon and requires a larger crew (no auto-loader).

The Ukrainians have been doing their very best to take pictures of prisoners/gear they come upon in Russia, because this is primarily a PR offensive.

I am listening to this one right now, which is very relevant as our forever wars, including the proxy one against Russia, are driven by interests antithetical to Americans, and signed off on in DC by the swamp/blob anonymously.



GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The backbone of Ukraine's tank force was T-64's to start the war. T-62's were not in service at all with Russia when they invaded Ukraine. Only now is their much stronger military equipped with relics pulled from a field in Siberia. Nice attempt at a hand wave though.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

The backbone of Ukraine's tank force was T-64's to start the war. T-62's were not in service at all with Russia when they invaded Ukraine. Only now is their much stronger military equipped with relics pulled from a field in Siberia. Nice attempt at a hand wave though.


I'm certain the idea of a stronger Russia is based on a much more in depth analysis than the age of the tanks used. Your post is not convincing.
First Page Last Page
Page 241 of 283
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.