Russia/Ukraine from Another Perspective (Relaunch Part Deux)

484,130 Views | 9118 Replies | Last: 26 min ago by PlaneCrashGuy
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
P.U.T.U said:

Issue is I don't think they are building the A-50 anymore as they are focusing on the A-100 which appears to have a cost from $700 million to $1 billion each. The A-100 also requires high speed processing chips that Russia can't build and sanctions are slowing them down from getting them.
So what you are saying is Russia might wind up deploying more effective platforms more quickly as a result of this loss, aka, 'Russia got stronger' in this?

Interesting theory. I am not clear at all on if they have built 1 or 2 of these, but I had read they only had 2 A-50's actually active.

Quote:

The first flight of the A-100 prototype took place in February 2019. Earlier, an experimental A-100LL performed several flights as part of flight design tests.

An informed source told Russian state-owned agency RIA Novosti that the aircraft on February 9 made its maiden flight with radar equipment turned on.

The Premier program began in 2006 and the A-100 was scheduled to enter service in late 2020. It is being built by Vega Concern, Taganrog Beriev Aircraft Scientific and Technical Complex (TANTK) and United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) to provide an edge over the Cold War-era A-50 Mainstay being used by the Russian Aerospace Forces (VKS).

Russia wants to complete testing the A-100 by 2024.

Under the Premier-476 program, the new radar equipment was first mounted on an old 1990 built AWACS A-50 aircraft. It became a flying laboratory, which worked out the individual elements of the complex.
The modernized lightweight Il-76MD-90A aircraft produced in Ulyanovsk at the Aviastar-SP enterprise was chosen as the platform for the A-100. It can be on duty a thousand kilometres from its base for six hours in the air. It can be refuelled in flight.

The Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) will be placed 200km from the front line and can detect far into the depths of the enemy's defenses. The latest AWACS planes can transmit target data fully automatic without using voice communication. The Russians claim it is almost impossible to "muffle" it with electronic warfare (EW).

The Premier has a new dual-band phased array radar using which it will be able to detect air and sea and ground targets. The aircraft has an increased detection range and can better distinguish targets, including aircraft 'invisible' to conventional radars and cruise missiles created using stealth technologies. The Russian flying radar can reportedly simultaneously track up to 300 targets at 650 km.
The Chinese also certainly have an ability to assist if they choose to do so, but what little I know is that they seem to have been moving more to unmanned platforms;

Quote:

A future airborne warning and control system (AWACS) will likely not be one single early warning aircraft, but a cluster of platforms that can accomplish different missions and build an information network, said chief designers of China's early warning aircraft. The development trend of the world's most advanced AWACS has two aspects, namely the capability of an individual aircraft and the system, Lu Jun, chief designer of China's KJ-2000 early warning aircraft, said in a seminar organized by xinhuanet.com, the website of the Xinhua News Agency, on 06 July 2021.

For individual aircraft, they will be more capable of dealing with small targets, stealth aircraft and drones, said Lu, also an academician at the Chinese Academy of Engineering. But war is not about just an individual aircraft, but a system, so there should be space, aerial, ground, maritime and underwater platforms integrated together and doing their job, Lu said, noting that this will enhance the joint combat capability based on an information network system. The fast-developing military intelligentization will also contribute to the development of AWACS, Lu said.

Cui Jixian, the executive deputy designer of China's KJ-500 early warning aircraft and the chief designer of country's next generation AWCAS, said at the seminar that future AWACS will definitely become an information network system that includes not only one single aircraft, but a cluster of platforms that can either operate together or alone. These platforms will play their specially designed roles based on the demands of combat missions, with the final goal being winning the war, Cui said, noting that both large and small AWCAS platforms are future trends.

Some Chinese military observers and analysts have been discussing whether larger platforms like the KJ-2000 or smaller platforms like the KJ-500 or even drones are better candidates for future AWACS development, but the two chief designers' remarks indicate that both types could be developed, a Chinese military expert told the Global Times on 08 July 2021, requesting anonymity.

The KJ-2000 was developed based on the Russian 190 ton-class Il-76 large transport aircraft, and the KJ-500 is derived from the domestically made 60 ton-class Y-8 medium-sized transport aircraft. The Y-20 large transport aircraft is a good platform to spawn an early warning variant, and completely new platforms could be in the works, the expert said.

I think the Russians have also been wary of giving the CCP a 'foot hold' into their surveillance technology/platforms.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I doubt it.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rostec apparently delivered another 'new' A-50U though in September 2023. This is certainly an upgraded A-50, but I don't think they are solely procuring A-100's right now either.

Quote:

"The holding company Roselektronika and the United Aircraft Corporation (both are part of the state corporation Rostec) have provided for the Armed Forces another upgraded airborne long-range radar surveillance and guidance system A-50U," the Rostec press service said in a release.

Highlighting new and cutting-edge capabilities added to the aircraft, Rostec stated, "The aircraft can detect new types of aircraft. Also, it can simultaneously track a larger number of targets and guided fighters than its predecessor. Modern equipment has reduced the aircraft's weight and increased the plane's range and time in the air while performing combat missions."

In July this year, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu stressed the urgency of the A-50 Airborne Warning & Control System (AWACS) modernization in a conference call with Russian Armed Forces officers. The deficit in the number of modern A-50U AWACS aircraft has consistently been cited as a problem for the Russian Air Force (RuAF).

The modernization and swift delivery of the aircraft are essential because these flying radars are used in Russia's Special Military Operation in Ukraine and are believed to be indispensable for establishing air superiority. The A-50 is crucial to RuAF, offering long-range surveillance, command and control capabilities, and early warning of airborne threats.
I do think this is a critical capability the Russians are pretty short on, and as well the tool they have is largely…poor.
Quote:

On December 29, 2021, Beriev handed over the 7th A-50U to the RuAF. Speaking on occasion, the General Director of the Vega concern, which develops the supporting electronics for the platform, Vyacheslav Mikheev, said, "We continue to work on modernizing the military A-50 to the level of the A-50U. This is the seventh such complex delivered to the troops. We plan to commission the next aircraft in 2023."
On February 26, 2023, a Russian A-50U parked at the Machulishchy air base near Minsk, Belarus, may or may not have been damaged during a drone attack.

The 6 or 7 RuAF A-50Us are reportedly part of the 610th Combat Use and Retraining Center on the Ivanovo-Severny airbase. As part of the Special Military Operations, they likely operate from forward-located airbases, including Machulishchy air base near Minsk.
I don't think the loss of this airframe/crew is as significant as the propagandists for Kiev/Biden have claimed, though.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And I'll reshare that when this whole thing kicked off I was on another investment call at the time where both Ash Carter and Alex Younger (former MI6 head) stated that attacking NATO was not on Putins agenda.

He was focused on consolidating the non-NATO satellite countries of Russia to build further buffer to NATO. Ukraine, K Stan, and Moldova were the big three he wanted. He never intended to attack NATO.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It is being reported that a Ukrainian tennis player that did not shake hands with an opponent from Belarus lost to that opponent in straight sets, both bagels.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PlaneCrashGuy said:

"No ability to mount an offensive"

Forgot to actually read it, I see...

Quote:

The ISW's analysis indicates a probable shortfall in Russia's ability to realize significant operational breakthroughs, despite potential intensification of their offensive operations.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

"No ability to mount an offensive"

Forgot to actually read it, I see...

Quote:

The ISW's analysis indicates a probable shortfall in Russia's ability to realize significant operational breakthroughs, despite potential intensification of their offensive operations.



How are you defining "significant operational breakthroughs?"
Remember to be specific so we can come back and measure.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PlaneCrashGuy said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

"No ability to mount an offensive"

Forgot to actually read it, I see...

Quote:

The ISW's analysis indicates a probable shortfall in Russia's ability to realize significant operational breakthroughs, despite potential intensification of their offensive operations.



How are you defining "significant operational breakthroughs?"
Remember to be specific so we can come back and measure.
That would be what occurs if you have an successful offensive.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

"No ability to mount an offensive"

Forgot to actually read it, I see...

Quote:

The ISW's analysis indicates a probable shortfall in Russia's ability to realize significant operational breakthroughs, despite potential intensification of their offensive operations.



How are you defining "significant operational breakthroughs?"
Remember to be specific so we can come back and measure.
That would be what occurs if you have an successful offensive.


When you're ready to be serious (specific) you know where to find me.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

"No ability to mount an offensive"

Forgot to actually read it, I see...

Quote:

The ISW's analysis indicates a probable shortfall in Russia's ability to realize significant operational breakthroughs, despite potential intensification of their offensive operations.



How are you defining "significant operational breakthroughs?"
Remember to be specific so we can come back and measure.
That would be what occurs if you have an successful offensive.
What significant operational breakthroughs did the Ukrainian 'spring 2023 counter-offensive' achieve?

PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

"No ability to mount an offensive"

Forgot to actually read it, I see...

Quote:

The ISW's analysis indicates a probable shortfall in Russia's ability to realize significant operational breakthroughs, despite potential intensification of their offensive operations.



How are you defining "significant operational breakthroughs?"
Remember to be specific so we can come back and measure.
That would be what occurs if you have an successful offensive.
What significant operational breakthroughs did the Ukrainian 'spring 2023 counter-offensive' achieve?




Something about a foot and mouth.

But he was intentionally vague
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PlaneCrashGuy said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

"No ability to mount an offensive"

Forgot to actually read it, I see...

Quote:

The ISW's analysis indicates a probable shortfall in Russia's ability to realize significant operational breakthroughs, despite potential intensification of their offensive operations.



How are you defining "significant operational breakthroughs?"
Remember to be specific so we can come back and measure.
That would be what occurs if you have an successful offensive.


When you're ready to be serious (specific) you know where to find me.
You seem to think they CAN mount an offensive. Why don't YOU be specific?

And you'll be right here in your safe space thread, happily pimping for Putin.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

"No ability to mount an offensive"

Forgot to actually read it, I see...

Quote:

The ISW's analysis indicates a probable shortfall in Russia's ability to realize significant operational breakthroughs, despite potential intensification of their offensive operations.



How are you defining "significant operational breakthroughs?"
Remember to be specific so we can come back and measure.
That would be what occurs if you have an successful offensive.
What significant operational breakthroughs did the Ukrainian 'spring 2023 counter-offensive' achieve?


Not really any. What does that have to do with Russia not being able to mount an offensive right now?
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A lot of puffery early on about sanctions crippling the Russians in short order.

What evidence do we have of the true state of the Russian economy?
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PlaneCrashGuy said:

"No ability to mount an offensive"



They don't. Nothing he posted changes that. Russians talk a lot. They also don't do a lot.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ISW disagrees with you. Sorry.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No, they don't.

Quote:


The ISW's analysis indicates a probable shortfall in Russia's ability to realize significant operational breakthroughs, despite potential intensification of their offensive operations.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

No, they don't.

Quote:


The ISW's analysis indicates a probable shortfall in Russia's ability to realize significant operational breakthroughs, despite potential intensification of their offensive operations.



"No ability to mount an offensive" -Teslag

"Probable shortfall in ability to make significant gains" -Teslag a few week later

Thats called a crawfish.

"As the temperature drops and the ground in Ukraine eventually freezes over the coming weeks, according to Insitute for the Study of War (ISW) there is growing speculation that the Russian military will launch a new offensive specifically targeting the eastern and southern regions."

Keep squealing.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No one said the Russians wouldn't try. But there's a difference between trying and succeeding.

The Russians have no ability to mount an offensive.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Saint Zelensky condescending to mock Donald Trump. Sure, that's helpful. Now Republicans should be even more excited to approve more aid, right?





A lot of vapors coming out of Europe, but not a lot of spending…







War cheerleaders should take note of real feedback from Ukraine outside of their propaganda industry/apologists like "Sarah" Cirillo, etc:



The Biden proxy war and massive disruption in energy costs the 'globalists' have driven through this conflict (and nordstream bombing etc) have really kicked up a huge political impact in Germany. They might try to ban the AfD but the left there also has a new party posing a real threat to the 'establishment' which wants to change the approach to Russia:

Quote:

For comparison: the SPD, traditionally one of the core parties of Germany and the political home of Chancellor Olaf Scholz, reaches 14% as well. For the BSW this is an impressive figure, but for the SPD it is catastrophic. Meanwhile the Greens, the second partner in Berlin's governing "Ampel" coalition, are at 12%. The FDP, the third "Ampel" component, would fail to get any seats at all (due to not crossing Germany's electoral threshold of 5%). Sarah Wagenknecht's own former party, Die Linke, would suffer the same fate. The only two parties that would do better than the BSW are the traditional center-right CDU (27%) and the populist-right/far-right AfD (18%).

In sum, with BSW, we are witnessing not the making of a fringe but a core movement in what seems to be emerging as Germany's re-shaped party system, consisting of three traditional parties (SPD, CDU, and the Greens) and two new forces. The latter are coming from the right and left periphery but are likely to re-define the center, directly and by their pressure on the traditional players.

Representatives of the threatened traditional parties and their expert and mainstream media surrogates often denounce the challengers from the wings as extremists or, at least, irresponsible populists (just another way of saying "demagogue"). But they only have themselves to blame: The true cause of this tectonic movement is the failure of the traditionals. The challengers' rise marks a reaction to it.

Wagenknecht is right about this: Germany's "democracy is imperiled most of all" by government policies that make ever more citizens feel left alone or alienated.

Against that background, the BSW promises more generous social policies, such as on education, wages, and pensions (and higher taxes for the wealthy). As Germany is doing badly economically, this will resonate. And Wagenknecht, a political "natural," knows how to signal: She has just taken the side of the protesting farmers as do the majority (68%) of Germans, according to polls.

Mainstream media are making desperate attempts to frame the rebellious farmers as serving extremists and somehow playing into the hands of guess which country! Russia. The ever more besieged minister of the economy Robert Habeck has even detected financing by guess who! "Putin!" (without, of course, providing any evidence). This time, these tired scare tactics are failing to catch on. Wagenknecht's public call for chancellor Olaf Scholz to apologize to the farmers will fare better.

Crucially, Wagenknecht and the BSW have combined socially left approaches with a set of traditionally conservative stances, challenging, for instance, the hypertrophic development of new gender categories or, in general, "symbolical struggles" over hyper-sensitive terminology, so fashionable with what Wagenknecht dismisses as the "lifestyle Left."

While this push-back against political correctness is a largely symbolic, though effective, operation, migration is a more substantial field. There as well, Wagenknecht has adopted positions closer to the right and center than the liberal left, stressing the need for control and limits. The fact that she herself had a Persian father and that prominent BSW heads are also non-ethnic Germans gives her a strong starting position for this kind of debate, shielding her points from dismissal as racist or xenophobic.

Given how many Germans feel, left alone in an economic crisis and also alienated by especially Green attempts at re-education in the spirit of urban upper class multiculturalism and gender obsessions, it will be hard to counter the BSW's brand of socially left but otherwise centrist and even conservative policies. No wonder then that opponents are trying to portray Wagenknecht as a monster, along with the new party. Their playbook is predictable and boring: namely to smear them as being pro-Russian or even working in the service of Russia.

In reality, Wagenknecht has positioned her new party to resist the push for ever more confrontation with Moscow, especially with regard to Ukraine. At this moment, for instance, she is speaking up against the delivery of German Taurus cruise missiles to Ukraine, which is the latest fad among the insatiable "miracle weapon" addicts. More generally, she is demanding to shift from a policy of military confrontation by proxy to one of negotiation and compromise, which makes, of course, perfect sense.

For her enemies, there is an irony waiting to catch them: They may hope that accusing Wagenknecht of being too friendly toward Russia will weaken her appeal. Yet that ship has sailed. The days of making hay with unbridled neo-McCarthyism are ending. It is more likely, fortunately, that the BSW's reasonable approach to foreign policy will only get it more sympathy and voters.
As it should. Because remember: At this point, Germany is so dependent on the US that it is treated not only like a vassal, but like a vassal whose wishes and interests do not count. Even Germans who distrust Russia will come to understand that this is fundamentally unsound. In its own national interest, Germany must re-establish some balance by rebuilding its relationship with Russia.
I actually think the same could happen to the CCP-Dems here, who have sponsored this war so loudly, and driven such alienation from Americans as well domestically. But I don't know that there is a "Wagenknecht" on the scene here (on the left) to provide such leadership.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

No one said the Russians wouldn't try. But there's a difference between trying and succeeding.

The Russians have no ability to mount an offensive.


ISW disagrees with you. I'll take their word over yours. I'm sure you can understand.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This ISW?

Quote:

The ISW's analysis indicates a probable shortfall in Russia's ability to realize significant operational breakthroughs, despite potential intensification of their offensive operations.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

This ISW?

Quote:

The ISW's analysis indicates a probable shortfall in Russia's ability to realize significant operational breakthroughs, despite potential intensification of their offensive operations.



Watching you back pedal is enough for me. Thanks.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What back pedal?

Myself and ISW believe that Russia has no ability to mount an offensive.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PlaneCrashGuy said:

Teslag said:

This ISW?

Quote:

The ISW's analysis indicates a probable shortfall in Russia's ability to realize significant operational breakthroughs, despite potential intensification of their offensive operations.



Watching you back pedal is enough for me. Thanks.
It's not backpedaling to point out you're wrong.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some updates from Rob Campbell for the week. The maps are interesting. I believe he is Scottish.

Again the developments toward 'supporting' Ukraine in Germany are quite…Germaine I think, to the war.

Quote:

The German parliament (Bundestag) has overwhelmingly rejected a resolution to give Ukraine long range Taurus missiles (above). 485 voted against and 178 for. This is a sure sign of Ukraine war fatigue or of reason asserting itself over German emotion.
Quote:

Russian philosopher Alexander Dugin has suggested that this could be a year of revolution as the globalist left, which has usurped the working class left (to which I belong), faces challenges from the non-globalist left which could combine with right wing movements such as the AfD in Germany and Marine Le Pen in France. Those who want change in Europe are frustrated by the lack of choice at the ballot box so a populist revolution in which the categories of left and right are collapsed could challenge the establishment on the streets. Arguably, this has already started.
I'm a fan of the 'globalist left' losing power, in every instance, including China Joe.

Also, the Russian strikes (wrongly dismissed out of hand as desperate/ineffective) may in fact have also struck the domestic artillery production capabilities in Ukraine this week;

Quote:

Russian Missile/Drone Attacks
12th/13th January Overnight
According to the Military Chronicle:
Quote:

A massive missile attack has been reported throughout Ukraine since about 8 am. The final of the strike was the launch of Kh-22/32 missiles from the Tu-22M3. Earlier, the first batch went to the targets of the Kh-101, which circled over cities for more than an hour, identifying enemy air defenses. According to the enemy, the hypersonic Kinzhals were launched from the MiG-31K. The enemy reports a strike by Kinzhals on objects in the Dnipropetrovsk area. Strikes were also noted in other regions of Ukraine: in the Mykolaiv region, Kremenchuk, Poltava region and in the Ivano-Frankivsk region. We'll find out the details in the evening.
The Russian MoD reported that:
Quote:

During the morning strike, Ukrainian military-industrial complex facilities producing 155, 152, and 125 mm shells, gunpowder, and UAVs were hit, the target of the strike was achieved, all designated facilities were hit
Another report claims that Chernikov and Kharkov were also attacked while Dima has reported that Patriot and Stormshadow missiles were among those destroyed along with a number of aircraft.

13th/14th January Overnight

According to Rybar:
Quote:

Ukrainian media and authorities reported on the explosions in Kiev, Dnepropetrovsk, Kropivnitsky, Kremenchuk, Chernigov, in the Sumy region and the Kiev-controlled city of Kherson.
14th/15th January Overnight
Sumy, Kharkov, Krivoy Rog and Kherson were attacked by Russian missiles/drones overnight.
15th/16th January Overnight

The Two Majors reported that:
Quote:

Our Aerospace Forces launched a series of strikes on AFU military facilities in Berislav, Kherson region, targeting warehouses and reserves. New facilities in Kharkov Region were hit, with a strike on the Kurazovska TPP, according to preliminary data, the enemy was hiding equipment and personnel there.
The Russian MoD claimed that 60 French mercenaries were killed at a temporary collection point in Kharkov during this attack while another 20 were wounded.
16th/17th January Overnight
According to the Two Majors:
Quote:

At night, missile strikes were carried out on targets in Kharkov, Geranium UAVs operated in the Odessa region, and the operation of air defence systems was reported from the Nikolayev, Odessa, and Zaporozhye regions.
Ukrainian military bases/command and control centres were destroyed in Kharkov and Odessa.
17th/18th January Overnight

According to the Military Chronicle:
Quote:

Night strikes by "Gerans" were recorded at the Starokostyantyniv airfield in the Khmelnytskyi region. Powerful strikes were seen in Snigirivka near Kherson, as well as in Pavlohrad in the Dnipropetrovsk region. In the area of Piatykhatki on the Zaporizhzhia front, closer to the Dnieper, our attack aircraft occupied several enemy fortifications.

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


He's right.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sounds like Russia is hitting military targets, not civilian ones.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Where's the best place to get reliable information on the situation in Avdeevka? It sounds like Uke might be about to lose it. For supposedly being a place for tactical discussion, the yokels in the other thread are silent on this.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is Russia STILL trying to take that abandoned town? Jeez, and we thought the Ukrainian counter offense was bad.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PlaneCrashGuy said:

Where's the best place to get reliable information on the situation in Avdeevka? It sounds like Uke might be about to lose it. For supposedly being a place for tactical discussion, the yokels in the other thread are silent on this.
Suriyak maps is pretty good, or the rybar ones for more detail...







Update: UFA has their 47th going against penal/DPR units mainly, there, which is why the Bradley's hectoring a T-90M got so much fan fare. Holidays over now (orthodox), Russian advances resume, some discussion of the French foreign legion losses (not really a surprise).



Quote:

That means any fantasies of extremely 'heavy' Russian losses are just that. There are occasional episodes of 5-15 troops dying at a time, which are used by Ukraine to play to emotions and create the perception of a killing field; but in reality, most days there are very few losses. And despite Russia's technical deficiencies in this area, they are using brute force to inflict heavier casualties on Ukraine with bombs and artillery raining down all day and generating a constant flow of sanitary losses.

Avdeevka is taking far longer than many imagined, as some believed it would fall by the end of last year. At this pace it could likely hold another three months if not even longer. It may very well hold for six months, however in the end it will certainly fall. The AFU troops in the town speak of vast Russian firepower superiority and the constant ability to rotate fresh troops. It may wield a cudgel rather than the hoped-for scalpel here, but Russia simply has far too many resources and fresh troops and they are inexorably inching forward.

In the end, Avdeevka is cunningly providing the same result as Bakhmut: more 'expendable' Russian troops are being traded for Ukraine's most irreplaceable elite units.









nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sort of interesting topic related to the developments flowing somewhat/largely to/from this war:



More:
Quote:

Anvil, also known as Interceptor, is an unmanned combat aerial vehicle quadrotor designed principally to attack other unmanned aerial vehicles. When launched, Anvil locates target drones using computer vision, and can be commanded to kinetically ram targets by its operator. The drone can reportedly reach speeds of up to 200 mph (320 km/h). Anduril is also developing versions to attack larger targets like helicopters or cruise missiles. Anvil can be integrated into Anduril's Lattice system. A detonating version called the Anvil-M was unveiled in October 2023.

Lattice is a software platform that can use artificial intelligence to classify objects by ingesting and fusing data from disparate sensors, including from Anduril's own platforms and those of third parties. Lattice has been used to control Anduril equipment for national border and military base surveillance.

The Sentry Tower is a 33-foot (10 meter) tall solar-powered portable surveillance tower. The Sentry contains a camera, communications antennae, radar, and thermal imaging equipment. The tower operates autonomously and feeds data back into Anduril's Lattice system, which can classify moving objects and targets in the imagery. When disassembled, the Sentry can fit into a pickup truck, and can reportedly be re-assembled in under an hour. The CBP says agents can set up individual systems at the border in under 2 hours. The Sentry Tower and associated systems such as Lattice have been referred to as a virtual border wall or smart wall.

Fury is a long-range, subsonic, stealthy military drone with 17-foot wingspan suited for surveillance and combat operations.

The Roadrunner is a 6 ft (1.8 m)-long twin turbojet-powered delta-winged craft capable of high subsonic speeds and extreme maneuverability; company officials describe it as somewhere between an autonomous drone and a reusable missile. The basic version can be fitted with modular payloads such as intelligence and reconnaissance sensors, while the Roadrunner-M has an explosive warhead to intercept UAS, cruise missiles, and manned aircraft. Both models can take off and land vertically from a dedicated container, and the munition version can be recovered if not detonated. Although specifications are not known, it is purported to have three times the warhead payload, three times the maneuverability under g-forces, and 10 times the one-way range of comparable air vehicles.

Anduril revealed the Roadrunner in December 2023, saying that it had been in development for two years, and that they were about to begin low-rate production for an order of hundreds of units. A single unit costs in the low hundreds of thousands of dollars but price is expected to drop as more get produced.
I like the 'money ball' reference.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

Is Russia STILL trying to take that abandoned town? Jeez, and we thought the Ukrainian counter offense was bad.


I think they already have. Lots pf videos of dead Ukes, very sad.

But I do love to see you back pedal. What happened to "gaining ground everyday"? Now you're pretending you always knew.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why would Ukraine be gaining ground if they aren't conducting an offensive?
First Page Last Page
Page 159 of 261
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.