Oh no, never, that is a sacrosanct principle. As Turkey and Greece agree.
Our 'partners' in the war for freedom in Ukraine:
Recreating their forefathers good ol' days during the holocaust:
This is a decent summary of r
ecent events: Quote:
Aside from failures on the battlefields, Ukraine had a rough few weeks filled with massive L's surrounding it on international arena and it makes you wonder if it's all coincidental.
Zelensky's massive failure at the UN
No invitation to Congress
Duda and Lula refuse to meet with him
NYT article debunking the missile hit on the market in Konstantinovka
No ATACMS "anytime soon"
Getting compared to a drowning man
Numerous media outlets admitting that we've been lied to about Ukraine's success at the front and talking about Ukraine losing
Poltava recruitment office admitting 80% casualty rate
"Sarah" Ashton Cirillo getting fired and being put under investigation
The new package(s) announced doesn't contain anything remotely close to being able to turn the tide and will only prolong the suffering of Ukrainian soldiers. But you can see from the tones, facial expressions and gloom in the corporate war media that the audience is being set up for the inevitable.
The question, how painful the process of losing is going to be for the world as whole, but especially for those that invested certain percentages of their GDP into the sinking ship that is Ukraine. We can all anticipate either some huge provocation or false flag as a last attempt to reinvigorate the interests of the investors into Ukrainian misery.
I like the 'stand for freedom' poster in English in the background. No doubt that one was printed/paid for with US dollars:
On the idiot front, Sean Penn (CCP/idiot) was on national TV blathering that he wishes there was more nuclear brinksmanship/we're not doing enough to confront Putin/Russia over Donbas/Crimea.
I think Caitlin does a good job pointing out the utter emptiness of the whole 'this is in American and world interests' in her piece a couple days ago:
Quote:
Empire loyalists often talk about nuclear brinkmanship like it's something courageous that they personally are doing, as though gambling every terrestrial life on strategic grand chessboard maneuverings is a brave risk that could only hurt them. If you think you are brave for risking the life of everyone on earth to advance your personal geopolitical agendas, you might be a malignant narcissist, because you think the world revolves around you, and other lives exist only as props to support your main character adventures.
Hardly any human on this planet gives a **** who governs Crimea or the Donbass and exactly zero of the plants and animals do but people like Sean Penn and Paul Massaro think they have every right to not only gamble all their lives on a bid to control that outcome, but to call themselves courageous for doing so. Imagine being so self-absorbed you think you're a brave hero for putting the lives of Africans, Asians, and South Americans on the betting table who've never even heard of Donetsk or Luhansk and don't care who governs them, as well as every non-human life on earth.
I mean, the absolute arrogance. The ****ing gall. It's as emotionally stunted and infantile a perspective as you could possibly come up with, but these are the people whose worldview is shaping outcomes on this planet. These are the sort of people who are setting the trajectory of our species as a collective.
RSH has a very biased/anti-Ukrainian
casualty discussion up. I do think it's reasonable to impute/swag Ukraine has at least 250K-300K KIA, though his high end numbers seem silly.
Anyway, forever war, comrades. Everything is going so great, I am shocked biden(*) is rumored to be pushing Zelensky to negotiate in November.
