ABATTBQ11 said:
fka ftc said:
ABATTBQ11 said:
fka ftc said:
PlaneCrashGuy said:
GAC06 said:
PlaneCrashGuy said:
You didnt stay long or say much.
Is that because this thread is less fun now that NYT made Uke propaganda obvious? Was celebrating 1-2 meters of "gains" always a bit or did it just recently get old? Is the breakthrough coming?
Are you going to track my presence on this thread now? Go ahead and mark me present this morning laughing at the latest updates from RT.
Did you have any answers? I'd like to hear your thoughts...
Along with their friends who troll this thread calling people Putin fanbois, Russian intelligence plants or purveyors of Russian propaganda, they do not seek discussion. They only seek to silence any dissenting views of their most fabulous, most sovereign Ukraine and its brave wonderful leader Zelensky.
If it helps, just imagine they are Vindman with a keyboard and TexAgs account and you can get a pretty accurate idea of who they are.
The irony of someone posting this and continually citing the literal mouthpieces of the Russian government as purveyors of fact beyond reproach is palpable. You say picture them as Vindman with a keyboard, but maybe you should picture yourself as Scott Ritter.
Please show an example of me "citing the literal mouthpieces of the Russian government". Just one example. On this thread or any other threads or forums around here.
Just one example. Go on, give it a go. Or just apologize for making yet another false accusation.
You know, you're right. I did a long perusal of your history, and you don't cite Russian propaganda. In fact, you don't cite anything. You just post a bunch of BS as if it's all factually true and unquestionable. You let nortex or someone else post all the propaganda and then just nod along and pontificate.
Nice. Kudos to you for your research. But you let your ad Homs take over by calling my posts bullshat.
You want to counter points I make and positions I take, go for it. Happy to discuss where I get my information and how I form my opinions. I don't cite sources when the thoughts come from my own brain. I know that is a hard concept for many here, but some of are indeed capable of independent thought, some of us receive information from unconventional sources, some of us simply pay more attention, have learned more history and can understand broad, complex concepts.
And some folks simply cannot. For those that cannot, they typically resort to "muh Russia propaganda" or try and make me do collegiate research that they should be capable of doing on their own.
I only encourage you to maybe try harder to understand and learn about issues from multiple perspectives. How does that sound?