Kvetch said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

RWWilson said:

---

Children aren't born gay, they are, by and large, recruited to the LGBTQ+. The statistics are clear. How else to explain Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. You may be born more or less masculine or feminine, but you aren't "born that way".

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11501300/

---

This stat again and damaging and false premise that most gay men are molested. They weren't.

Get a new schtick and take your derail somewhere else. As a gay man I can't even fathom how people think you can be recruited into this or would choose this life.

---

So are some people just born as puppy play gimps, or is that a desire that they choose and cultivate over time until they feel it is a part of their identity?

---

Don't know what that is and I'm afraid to google it.

---

You haven't seen our current nuclear waste kleptomaniac?

---

Oh, yeah. Now I remember. What a freak.

GeorgiAg said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

RWWilson said:

---

Children aren't born gay, they are, by and large, recruited to the LGBTQ+. The statistics are clear. How else to explain Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. You may be born more or less masculine or feminine, but you aren't "born that way".

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11501300/

---

This stat again and damaging and false premise that most gay men are molested. They weren't.

Get a new schtick and take your derail somewhere else. As a gay man I can't even fathom how people think you can be recruited into this or would choose this life.

---

So are some people just born as puppy play gimps, or is that a desire that they choose and cultivate over time until they feel it is a part of their identity?

---

Don't know what that is and I'm afraid to google it.

---

riverrataggie said:

---

What a gay bill.

That said, I'd support through 8th grade. Sad as others said this has to be even proposed.

---

i'd support it just not being discussed at school at all ever.

Get Off My Lawn said:

---

In this thread alone you've thrown victim cards, you've maligned other posters, you've derailed the topic, you've accused others of bigotry, you've waffled on your actual position, and you've thread spamming to try to avoid supporters of legislation from having a reasoned discussion.

No matter what you feel - you don't present yourself as a stable or respectful poster. And that's even WITH mod cleanups in your corner.

---

I totally disagree.

No Spin Ag said:

---

Agthatbuilds said:

---

https://www.kxan.com/news/texas/texas-bills-aim-to-eliminate-gender-identity-sexual-orientation-topics-in-the-classroom/?utm_campaign=socialflow&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=t.co

Quote:

---

HB 631, filed by House Rep. Steve Toth (R-The Woodlands), said discussions on sexual orientation and gender identity aren't allowed in the classroom from kindergarten through fifth grade. Meanwhile, HB 1155, filed by House Rep. Jared Patterson (R-Frisco), would restrict discussion of these topics from kindergarten through eighth grade.

---

It's absurd this even needs to be a law.

---

So it'll be Okay for them to become gay when they get to the 9th grade? Okay.

---

User name does not check out.

TXAGFAN said:

---

RWWilson said:

---

Children aren't born gay, they are, by and large, recruited to the LGBTQ+. The statistics are clear. How else to explain Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. You may be born more or less masculine or feminine, but you aren't "born that way".

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11501300/

---

This stat again and damaging and false premise that most gay men are molested. They weren't.

Get a new schtick and take your derail somewhere else. As a gay man I can't even fathom how people think you can be recruited into this or would choose this life.

---

I did not and do not claim "most gay men were molested". That is lie and hopefully you will retract it. I simply cited a study that homosexual men are far more likely (7x) to report being molested by a man. Add that to 20% plus Gen Z identifying as LGBTQ+ and there is no other logical explanation than massive propaganda and "recruitment". Normalizing and celebrating behavior will increase its likelihood just like stigmatizing behavior decreases the behavior.

You can claim "nobody would choose a particular lifestyle", but they do, just as people choose to be alcoholics.

LegalDrugPusher said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Agthatbuilds said:

---

https://www.kxan.com/news/texas/texas-bills-aim-to-eliminate-gender-identity-sexual-orientation-topics-in-the-classroom/?utm_campaign=socialflow&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=t.co

Quote:

---

HB 631, filed by House Rep. Steve Toth (R-The Woodlands), said discussions on sexual orientation and gender identity aren't allowed in the classroom from kindergarten through fifth grade. Meanwhile, HB 1155, filed by House Rep. Jared Patterson (R-Frisco), would restrict discussion of these topics from kindergarten through eighth grade.

---

It's absurd this even needs to be a law.

---

So it'll be Okay for them to become gay when they get to the 9th grade? Okay.

---

Should be extended out till death

---

This is the way. Don't ask, don't tell should be official State policy. Sure my gaydar might be pinging but we shall not speak of such things.

The whole point of bills that prohibit LGBTQ+ theory in elementary school is to protect children from teachings that would be harmful to them. Such teaching normalizes behavior that most parents do not desire for their children. Most gay people I've heard even say "do you think I would choose to be this way"? That indicates that they'd rather be another way, and the only other way is heterosexual. We should desire that normal sexual life for everyone.

RWWilson said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

RWWilson said:

---

Children aren't born gay, they are, by and large, recruited to the LGBTQ+. The statistics are clear. How else to explain Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. You may be born more or less masculine or feminine, but you aren't "born that way".

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11501300/

---

This stat again and damaging and false premise that most gay men are molested. They weren't.

Get a new schtick and take your derail somewhere else. As a gay man I can't even fathom how people think you can be recruited into this or would choose this life.

---

I did not and do not claim "most gay men were molested". That is lie and hopefully you will retract it. I simply cited a study that homosexual men are far more likely (7x) to report being molested by a man. Add that to 20% plus Gen Z identifying as LGBTQ+ and there is no other logical explanation than massive propaganda and "recruitment". Normalizing and celebrating behavior will increase its likelihood just like stigmatizing behavior decreases the behavior.

You can claim "nobody would choose a particular lifestyle", but they do, just as people choose to be alcoholics.

---

You can't say "by and large" LGBT people are recruited, post a stat for 46%, and then get upset I used the word "most" to characterize your bs opinion. Bizarre point of contention.

Its unfortunate that the ignorance and fear people have about LGBTQ+ folks will continue.

PabloSerna said:

---

Its unfortunate that the ignorance and fear people have about LGBTQ+ folks will continue.

---

You're extremely lost here. Nice ad hominem though.

Not really.

Ag87H2O said:

---

It's a sad statement on the state of our schools that this even needs to happen but glad they are moving on it. Better late than never.

---

So sad because Texas used to be a leader in things like this but these days we seem to take our direction from Florida.

TXAGFAN said:

---

RWWilson said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

RWWilson said:

---

Children aren't born gay, they are, by and large, recruited to the LGBTQ+. The statistics are clear. How else to explain Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. You may be born more or less masculine or feminine, but you aren't "born that way".

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11501300/

---

This stat again and damaging and false premise that most gay men are molested. They weren't.

Get a new schtick and take your derail somewhere else. As a gay man I can't even fathom how people think you can be recruited into this or would choose this life.

---

I did not and do not claim "most gay men were molested". That is lie and hopefully you will retract it. I simply cited a study that homosexual men are far more likely (7x) to report being molested by a man. Add that to 20% plus Gen Z identifying as LGBTQ+ and there is no other logical explanation than massive propaganda and "recruitment". Normalizing and celebrating behavior will increase its likelihood just like stigmatizing behavior decreases the behavior.

You can claim "nobody would choose a particular lifestyle", but they do, just as people choose to be alcoholics.

---

You can't say "by and large" LGBT people are recruited, post a stat for 46%, and then get upset I used the word "most" to characterize your bs opinion. Bizarre point of contention.

---

There is certainly some sort of correlation between a boy being molested by a man and the later chance he lives as a homosexual. The statistics are and have always been consistent (7x more homosexual men report homosexual molestation than heterosexual men). It is not my "opinion" and certainly not "b.s.". It is backed by years of statistical studies.

We also know that homosexuals and heterosexuals both report choosing to pursue a sexual orientation different from a prior "orientation". People who are born with genetic features are unable to change them. You can't choose to change from man to woman, black to white, or green eyes to brown eyes. Genetics don't change. Additionally, the "homosexual gene" argument has long since been disproven and abandon. Evolutionary theory teaches useless genes are subject to negative selection pressures. If being gay were "genetic" the gene would have long-since died off.

So, while nature may play some part in homosexuality, there is clearly an environmental factor. To the extent we can control the environment and prevent children from pursuing a homosexual lifestyle, that would be preferable.

RWWilson said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

RWWilson said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

RWWilson said:

---

Children aren't born gay, they are, by and large, recruited to the LGBTQ+. The statistics are clear. How else to explain Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. You may be born more or less masculine or feminine, but you aren't "born that way".

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11501300/

---

This stat again and damaging and false premise that most gay men are molested. They weren't.

Get a new schtick and take your derail somewhere else. As a gay man I can't even fathom how people think you can be recruited into this or would choose this life.

---

I did not and do not claim "most gay men were molested". That is lie and hopefully you will retract it. I simply cited a study that homosexual men are far more likely (7x) to report being molested by a man. Add that to 20% plus Gen Z identifying as LGBTQ+ and there is no other logical explanation than massive propaganda and "recruitment". Normalizing and celebrating behavior will increase its likelihood just like stigmatizing behavior decreases the behavior.

You can claim "nobody would choose a particular lifestyle", but they do, just as people choose to be alcoholics.

---

You can't say "by and large" LGBT people are recruited, post a stat for 46%, and then get upset I used the word "most" to characterize your bs opinion. Bizarre point of contention.

---

There is certainly some sort of correlation between a boy being molested by a man and the later chance he lives as a homosexual. The statistics are and have always been consistent (7x more homosexual men report homosexual molestation than heterosexual men). It is not my "opinion" and certainly not "b.s.". It is backed by years of statistical studies.

We also know that homosexuals and heterosexuals both report choosing to pursue a sexual orientation different from a prior "orientation". People who are born with genetic features are unable to change them. You can't choose to change from man to woman, black to white, or green eyes to brown eyes. Genetics don't change. Additionally, the "homosexual gene" argument has long since been disproven and abandon. Evolutionary theory teaches useless genes are subject to negative selection pressures. If being gay were "genetic" the gene would have long-since died off.

So, while nature may play some part in homosexuality, there is clearly an environmental factor. To the extent we can control the environment and prevent children from pursuing a homosexual lifestyle, that would be preferable.

---

Nope. So much wrong in this. I think you just make stuff up. I wasn't molested, at all... not even a hint of itl. Most will tell you the same.

I do find that bisexual men were often abused as children....

and, the "homosexual gene" arguemnt is abandoned? By who? The faimly research council.

Just laughably biased "data"

TXAGFAN said:

---

RWWilson said:

---

Children aren't born gay, they are, by and large, recruited to the LGBTQ+. The statistics are clear. How else to explain Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. You may be born more or less masculine or feminine, but you aren't "born that way".

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11501300/

---

This stat again and damaging and false premise that most gay men are molested. They weren't.

Get a new schtick and take your derail somewhere else. As a gay man I can't even fathom how people think you can be recruited into this or would choose this life.

---

He shared that his brother was molested, which is very sad, but has also led him to lead an emotional crusade against gays that what happened to his brother must be the experience for all gay men.

Therefore, all gay sex must be rooted in evil. It's a bit of a narcissistic jump in logic, to say the least.

murphyag said:

---

Is this really a problem? What districts in Texas is this happening in where they are talking about gay stuff in elementary school? I have two kids and it didn't happen in either of their schools (private schools in Dallas and public schools in Lucas.) Never happened when I was a kid either. So, I'm just curious what Texas towns this is actually happening in. Seems like it would be on the local news all the time. Or I would hear about it at church or hear other parents talking about it at my kids sports practices and games.

---

Come on man...sure the reported and publicized incidents are relatively low...which is where I expect you'll move the goalposts to, but it should not happen at all. I respect laws like this that get out in front of troubling trends before they can really gain steam.

Per LibsOfTikTok and other similar social media accounts that post actual videos of proselytizing hardcore gay, gender fluid and trans people proudly proclaiming how they indoctrinate their young students though, this does seem to happen quite a bit.

We had gay teachers growing up and they just acted like everyone else. Not sure why that is increasingly so difficult. my theory is that with millennials and Gen Z, they are being praised for being gay and constantly called heroes for being loud and proud and in your face.

Tanya 93 said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

Why do kids that age need to discuss sexuality at all? I support this bill.

---

Because an increasing number of girls are getting their first period in 3rd or 4th grade.

They need to know that they can get pregnant now and how to avoid it.

---

DAFUQ? 8 and 9 yrs old?

Not to derail, but this seems like a troubling trend that may deserve its own thread.

BallerStaf2003 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

RWWilson said:

---

Children aren't born gay, they are, by and large, recruited to the LGBTQ+. The statistics are clear. How else to explain Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. You may be born more or less masculine or feminine, but you aren't "born that way".

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11501300/

---

This stat again and damaging and false premise that most gay men are molested. They weren't.

Get a new schtick and take your derail somewhere else. As a gay man I can't even fathom how people think you can be recruited into this or would choose this life.

---

He shared that his brother was molested, which is very sad, but has also led him to lead an emotional crusade against gays that what happened to his brother must be the experience for all gay men.

Therefore, all gay sex must be rooted in evil. It's a bit of a narcissistic jump in logic, to say the least.

---

Too be fair, people that think this almost always think the same for polygamy, orgies, adultery, prostitution etc.

It's not just male on male sodomy that they think is bad, so don't feel too "targeted".

Brittmoore Car Club said:

---

Tanya 93 said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

Why do kids that age need to discuss sexuality at all? I support this bill.

---

Because an increasing number of girls are getting their first period in 3rd or 4th grade.

They need to know that they can get pregnant now and how to avoid it.

---

DAFUQ? 8 and 9 yrs old?

Not to derail, but this seems like a troubling trend that may deserve its own thread.

---

I don't at all know the reason or even have knowledge of whether it's actually a trend or not, but there could very well be a no troubling explanation. If it's due to better something, say better nutrition (prenatal vitamins, better formula, more digestible food stuffs, more fiber, and, and, and...) jumpstarting development and therefore sexual maturity, is this something that we want to undo?

No Spin Ag said:

---

Agthatbuilds said:

---

https://www.kxan.com/news/texas/texas-bills-aim-to-eliminate-gender-identity-sexual-orientation-topics-in-the-classroom/?utm_campaign=socialflow&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=t.co

Quote:

---

HB 631, filed by House Rep. Steve Toth (R-The Woodlands), said discussions on sexual orientation and gender identity aren't allowed in the classroom from kindergarten through fifth grade. Meanwhile, HB 1155, filed by House Rep. Jared Patterson (R-Frisco), would restrict discussion of these topics from kindergarten through eighth grade.

---

It's absurd this even needs to be a law.

---

So it'll be Okay for them to become gay when they get to the 9th grade? Okay.

---

good point. We should make this through 12th grade.

Similar to the molestation question but purely anecdotal, I know I have known around a dozen gay guys. Only one of them had a present, stable, and loving father. I would be curious to see a legitimately non-biased study of this.

BallerStaf2003 said:

---

RWWilson said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

RWWilson said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

RWWilson said:

---

Children aren't born gay, they are, by and large, recruited to the LGBTQ+. The statistics are clear. How else to explain Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. You may be born more or less masculine or feminine, but you aren't "born that way".

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11501300/

---

This stat again and damaging and false premise that most gay men are molested. They weren't.

Get a new schtick and take your derail somewhere else. As a gay man I can't even fathom how people think you can be recruited into this or would choose this life.

---

I did not and do not claim "most gay men were molested". That is lie and hopefully you will retract it. I simply cited a study that homosexual men are far more likely (7x) to report being molested by a man. Add that to 20% plus Gen Z identifying as LGBTQ+ and there is no other logical explanation than massive propaganda and "recruitment". Normalizing and celebrating behavior will increase its likelihood just like stigmatizing behavior decreases the behavior.

You can claim "nobody would choose a particular lifestyle", but they do, just as people choose to be alcoholics.

---

You can't say "by and large" LGBT people are recruited, post a stat for 46%, and then get upset I used the word "most" to characterize your bs opinion. Bizarre point of contention.

---

There is certainly some sort of correlation between a boy being molested by a man and the later chance he lives as a homosexual. The statistics are and have always been consistent (7x more homosexual men report homosexual molestation than heterosexual men). It is not my "opinion" and certainly not "b.s.". It is backed by years of statistical studies.

We also know that homosexuals and heterosexuals both report choosing to pursue a sexual orientation different from a prior "orientation". People who are born with genetic features are unable to change them. You can't choose to change from man to woman, black to white, or green eyes to brown eyes. Genetics don't change. Additionally, the "homosexual gene" argument has long since been disproven and abandon. Evolutionary theory teaches useless genes are subject to negative selection pressures. If being gay were "genetic" the gene would have long-since died off.

So, while nature may play some part in homosexuality, there is clearly an environmental factor. To the extent we can control the environment and prevent children from pursuing a homosexual lifestyle, that would be preferable.

---

Nope. So much wrong in this. I think you just make stuff up. I wasn't molested, at all... not even a hint of itl. Most will tell you the same.

I do find that bisexual men were often abused as children....

and, the "homosexual gene" arguemnt is abandoned? By who? The faimly research council.

Just laughably biased "data"

---

I never claimed you were molested.

There is no homosexual gene. If there is, please show us your evidence.

https://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/news/20190829/there-is-no-gay-gene-major-study-concludes

https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/executive-summary-sexuality-and-gender

Point is, sexuality is very complex. There's all sort of research being done on what makes people tick, and sexuality is one topic.

To act like you know when gay men ON THIS THREAD are telling you their experience is different than what you're stating, is peak narcisisistc behavior. You're basically telling me how I am and what happened to me, and I'm telling you're wrong.

Most gay men will tell you the same thing. They weren't abused, and they always knew they were gay or different in some way.

chickencoupe16 said:

---

Similar to the molestation question but purely anecdotal, I know I have known around a dozen gay guys. Only one of them had a present, stable, and loving father. I would be curious to see a legitimately non-biased study of this.

---

My dad was very loving, and also hard on me like most fathers are.

There's 2!

chickencoupe16 said:

---

Brittmoore Car Club said:

---

Tanya 93 said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

Why do kids that age need to discuss sexuality at all? I support this bill.

---

Because an increasing number of girls are getting their first period in 3rd or 4th grade.

They need to know that they can get pregnant now and how to avoid it.

---

DAFUQ? 8 and 9 yrs old?

Not to derail, but this seems like a troubling trend that may deserve its own thread.

---

I don't at all know the reason or even have knowledge of whether it's actually a trend or not, but there could very well be a no troubling explanation. If it's due to better something, say better nutrition (prenatal vitamins, better formula, more digestible food stuffs, more fiber, and, and, and...) jumpstarting development and therefore sexual maturity, is this something that we want to undo?

---

If that is the case, no. But we have seen a sharp decline in mens' average testosterone rates...something like 30-40% since the 1980's...which IS troubling. People have theorized that, in addition to obesity rates, it could be due to all of the estrogenic compounds in the plastics and other things we consume on a daily basis. Even in young physically fit men, testosterone rates are much lower than they used to be. You can usually see it by comparing them physically to men from 20-40 years ago...less prominent jawlines, narrower chest/shoulders, less pronounced brows and less facial and body hair.

James Garner was 35 in the Great Escape. Steve McQueen was like 32. Fast fwd to Tom Selleck...35 in the below promo pic for Magnum PI in 1980. When was the last time you saw 30-something year old "kids" that looks like that?





If this is the case, I have to wonder if the same things are contributing to spikes in estrogen in younger girls.

I am always troubled when we are seeing new trends across the entire population that have never existed in human history.

8-10 year old girls are NEVER meant to breed. Their body's simply can't handle it the way teens and preteens could. So no, I don't think it's a good thing that many 3rd and 4th graders are now apparently of breeding age.

BallerStaf2003 said:

---

Point is, sexuality is very complex. There's all sort of research being done on what makes people tick, and sexuality is one topic.

To act like you know when gay men ON THIS THREAD are telling you their experience is different than what you're stating, is peak narcisisistc behavior. You're basically telling me how I am and what happened to me, and I'm telling you're wrong.

Most gay men will tell you the same thing. They weren't abused, and they always knew they were gay or different in some way.

---

You like being gay? Would you change if you "could"? Why not become celebrant?

BallerStaf2003 said:

---

Point is, sexuality is very complex. There's all sort of research being done on what makes people tick, and sexuality is one topic.

To act like you know when gay men ON THIS THREAD are telling you their experience is different than what you're stating, is peak narcisisistc behavior. You're basically telling me how I am and what happened to me, and I'm telling you're wrong.

Most gay men will tell you the same thing. They weren't abused, and they always knew they were gay or different in some way.

---

When someone cites statistical evidence, they are not making declarations about your specific circumstances. That is, in fact, very narcissistic to assume. Those statistics merely indicate there must be a significant environmental component to homosexuality. The same goes for the statistic indicating over 20% of Gen Z identifies as LGBTQ+. We do know that the natural inclination, the very purpose and biological operation of our sexual reproductive system, inclines toward heterosexuality. That is the norm. Anything else is abnormal. We should desire normal for children.

Those statistics evidencing environmental determination of sexuality are especially important in the context of what young children are being taught. Do we want to create an environment that leads to biological normal sexual relations or sexual relations which obviate the very purpose of our sexual reproductive system?

murphyag said:

---

Is this really a problem? What districts in Texas is this happening in where they are talking about gay stuff in elementary school? I have two kids and it didn't happen in either of their schools (private schools in Dallas and public schools in Lucas.) Never happened when I was a kid either. So, I'm just curious what Texas towns this is actually happening in. Seems like it would be on the local news all the time. Or I would hear about it at church or hear other parents talking about it at my kids sports practices and games.

---

Your reasoning is the same as the reasoning against codifying marriage as between a man and a woman.

Case in point, our current President in 2006.

Biden’s position on marriage before the Current Thing (2006): pic.twitter.com/hhDoxOkfUW

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) November 17, 2022

LegalDrugPusher said:

---

BallerStaf2003 said:

---

Point is, sexuality is very complex. There's all sort of research being done on what makes people tick, and sexuality is one topic.

To act like you know when gay men ON THIS THREAD are telling you their experience is different than what you're stating, is peak narcisisistc behavior. You're basically telling me how I am and what happened to me, and I'm telling you're wrong.

Most gay men will tell you the same thing. They weren't abused, and they always knew they were gay or different in some way.

---

You like being gay? Would you change if you "could"? Why not become celebrant?

---

Wut?

LegalDrugPusher said:

---

BallerStaf2003 said:

---

Point is, sexuality is very complex. There's all sort of research being done on what makes people tick, and sexuality is one topic.

To act like you know when gay men ON THIS THREAD are telling you their experience is different than what you're stating, is peak narcisisistc behavior. You're basically telling me how I am and what happened to me, and I'm telling you're wrong.

Most gay men will tell you the same thing. They weren't abused, and they always knew they were gay or different in some way.

---

You like being gay? Would you change if you "could"? Why not become celebrant?

---

I'm only going to become celebrant if the Aggies win the whole thing…

BallerStaf2003 said:

---

Nope. So much wrong in this. I think you just make stuff up. I wasn't molested, at all... not even a hint of itl. Most will tell you the same.

I do find that bisexual men were often abused as children...

---

So, likely heterosexual boys (as is the statistical norm) were abused and now have confusions about their sexuality.

That's the logical conclusion to your statement.

And people wonder why there is a parental resistance to opening up sexual topics to children from teachers and drag queens.

tehmackdaddy said:

---

BallerStaf2003 said:

---

Nope. So much wrong in this. I think you just make stuff up. I wasn't molested, at all... not even a hint of itl. Most will tell you the same.

I do find that bisexual men were often abused as children...

---

So, likely heterosexual boys (as is the statistical norm) were abused and now have confusions about their sexuality.

That's the logical conclusion to your statement.

And people wonder why there is a parental resistance to opening up sexual topics to children from teachers and drag queens.

---

That's quite a leap you've made. Getting raped as a child and sexual education are not comparable.

Agthatbuilds said:

---

https://www.kxan.com/news/texas/texas-bills-aim-to-eliminate-gender-identity-sexual-orientation-topics-in-the-classroom/?utm_campaign=socialflow&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=t.co

Quote:

---

HB 631, filed by House Rep. Steve Toth (R-The Woodlands), said discussions on sexual orientation and gender identity aren't allowed in the classroom from kindergarten through fifth grade. Meanwhile, HB 1155, filed by House Rep. Jared Patterson (R-Frisco), would restrict discussion of these topics from kindergarten through eighth grade.

---

It's absurd this even needs to be a law.

---

It doesn't need to be a law. Let the ISDs take care of it.

LegalDrugPusher said:

---

BallerStaf2003 said:

---

Point is, sexuality is very complex. There's all sort of research being done on what makes people tick, and sexuality is one topic.

To act like you know when gay men ON THIS THREAD are telling you their experience is different than what you're stating, is peak narcisisistc behavior. You're basically telling me how I am and what happened to me, and I'm telling you're wrong.

Most gay men will tell you the same thing. They weren't abused, and they always knew they were gay or different in some way.

---

You like being gay? Would you change if you "could"? Why not become celebrant?

---

These questions are so damn ignorant and insulting. It's amazing, really.

How's that kari lake governorship coming along? Any day now? Any other predictions for us?