The whether or not there on the rate of fall seems a little ambiguous. Building 7 sure does look like it meets it.Quote:
And as was pointed out in the other thread, you don't just put explosives on a building and it comes down. It takes A LOT of work by A LOT of people (there's that 100's involved in the conspiracy again who all have remained silent) to get a building ready to fall down. Also, it was NOT "controlled". Both the North and South towers damaged the buildings around them and DID NOT FALL AT FREE FALL SPEED despite the elementary education student stating it repeatedly.
But just as an outlier --- the wild card is this notion-claim of some kind of pre-wiring done after 1993 as some kind of ultimate precaution. That event rattled a lot of people, with the specter suddenly of `what if they came down' and people started thinking about it. (That part is true) It is just possible to see in the rather naive and upbeat 90's where the future looked ever bright that something odd was done as a failsafe in completely good faith. I don't believe it but the fact is some of those citations had a lot of testimony, who had access type stuff, other connections, etc. Since one has no way of knowing what is simply made up without doing the research themselves, can't possibly venture whether its all just fabrication. But one thing is clear and more slack should be given -- its easier to understand why a subsection of the public is buying into some of this.
To distinguish own stance. Remain rather agnostic about Building 7. Its so much later, its just conceivable even some kind of elaborate fiscal payback/insurance motive, whatever - with tycoon level wealth its hard to know - it might have been dropped. No one died from it-- another clue that a benign drop might just be true there, and it is leading everyone astray about the rest. Napolitano before he was crazy seemed to think something in it, even Geraldo. Just saying that it is possible for analysis to be confused about an outlier that is true, and ends up making everything else screwed up in interpretation.