DNA is a match, evil monster needs to be put down.
One other new thing was that they found DNA on one of the victim's nightgown. If that is matched to BK, he's toast.PA24 said:
DNA is a match, evil monster needs to be put down.
I might have misheard. The topic was the DNA on the knife sheath and that was found under Maddie's body and "nightclothes" meaning the bed comforter, I think. It was awkwardly worded from a motion filed the other day, conflating the DNA "location" as found there but they reall only meant on the sheath that was found there, under the comforter and her body.jrrhouston98 said:
And this has not made the media headlines yet. Where did this come from?
One thing I can say it news to me is the confirmation that investigators were in fact using a DNA public database to find people who were related to the DNA on the sheath and they found over a hundred potential matches as they honed in on BK. Prosecution is claiming there are no records pertaining to that search however as they were taking screen shots. And when I say "they" I mean the FBI.jrrhouston98 said:
Thank you for the clarification. That's big news if it is in other locations.
MsDoubleD81 said:
My thoughts, he had a thing for Maddie. The other 3 were unexpected and he had to cover his tracks.
Regarding the sheath, I think he had it attached to him, and it got knocked off in a struggle.
Something has always struck me as being fishy about that part of the prosecution's story.TexasRebel said:MsDoubleD81 said:
My thoughts, he had a thing for Maddie. The other 3 were unexpected and he had to cover his tracks.
Regarding the sheath, I think he had it attached to him, and it got knocked off in a struggle.
Ka-Bar sheaths are attached by belt through leather loop. There's no pulling it off without breaking something.
He probably did NOT have it looped through the belt, maybe tucked in the waistband or shoved in his pocket, then pulled it out, holding sheath in off hand, pulled knife with primary hand, dropped, or lost sheath.Jabin said:Something has always struck me as being fishy about that part of the prosecution's story.TexasRebel said:MsDoubleD81 said:
My thoughts, he had a thing for Maddie. The other 3 were unexpected and he had to cover his tracks.
Regarding the sheath, I think he had it attached to him, and it got knocked off in a struggle.
Ka-Bar sheaths are attached by belt through leather loop. There's no pulling it off without breaking something.
Yeah, just because it is designed to be worn on a belt doesn't mean he wore it on a belt.flakrat said:He probably did NOT have it looped through the belt, maybe tucked in the waistband or shoved in his pocket, then pulled it out, holding sheath in off hand, pulled knife with primary hand, dropped, or lost sheath.Jabin said:Something has always struck me as being fishy about that part of the prosecution's story.TexasRebel said:MsDoubleD81 said:
My thoughts, he had a thing for Maddie. The other 3 were unexpected and he had to cover his tracks.
Regarding the sheath, I think he had it attached to him, and it got knocked off in a struggle.
Ka-Bar sheaths are attached by belt through leather loop. There's no pulling it off without breaking something.
We have no idea what kind of clothes or hazmat type suit he was wearing othe than it was dark in color. He may not have worn a belt at all.Quote:
Yeah, just because it is designed to be worn on a belt doesn't mean he wore it on a belt.
No signs of a sexual assault that I'm aware of, if that is what you are suggesting. Because DNA such as that would have "come out" so to speak.CheeseSndwch said:
Or he unfastened his belt.
As do IQuote:
I have a sneaky feeling the judge is going to bar cameras for the trial.
TBH, I lost track when the hold happened. It was in late July originally.MsDoubleD81 said:
Xana's mom has said she doesn't support it. Kaylee's family strongly support.
When is the deadline to file that they are pursuing that angle?
I don't see how someone who lost a child to a murderer, someone who stole everything from their child and from their family, could be opposed to the death penalty. I suppose some of us are just wired differently. I'd volunteer to carry it out, though I'd stick the needle in both eyes prior to half-ass looking for a vein, being sure to take my time.MsDoubleD81 said:
Xana's mom has said she doesn't support it. Kaylee's family strongly support.
When is the deadline to file that they are pursuing that angle?
one safe place said:I don't see how someone who lost a child to a murderer, someone who stole everything from their child and from their family, could be opposed to the death penalty. I suppose some of us are just wired differently. I'd volunteer to carry it out, though I'd stick the needle in both eyes prior to half-ass looking for a vein, being sure to take my time.MsDoubleD81 said:
Xana's mom has said she doesn't support it. Kaylee's family strongly support.
When is the deadline to file that they are pursuing that angle?
Can't disagree with that, considering it is the biggest case to hit that jurisdiction in decades.MsDoubleD81 said:
I don't have much confidence in a judge who didn't take the time to learn how to pronounce the victim names prior to a hearing.
WHOA! Kind of surprised a bit. That throws a big twist in jury selection.Quote:
The state filed for the death penalty today.
aggiehawg said:Can't disagree with that, considering it is the biggest case to hit that jurisdiction in decades.MsDoubleD81 said:
I don't have much confidence in a judge who didn't take the time to learn how to pronounce the victim names prior to a hearing.
I really hope we can see a live stream of the trial. (And I am still alive when it happens because I think it gets continued for an another year or so.)
Not a Bot said:
Busy few days:
- Defense requested discovery information, including info on three unknown male DNA samples found during investigation. One of the samples was found on a discarded glove outside the home. Also requesting FBI records from their genealogical search. FBI typically does not keep the genealogical tree developed from the DNA. This is crucial IMO because keeping and reviewing this data (and dates of research) can go to them working forwards instead of backwards. They don't want anyone seeing their work. Why not? Can the government show they didn't just pick Kohberger and then fake the DNA? How do we know they did the genealogical tree at all?
- The state filed for the death penalty today.
Just getting old and the wages of sin and all that.Quote:
Hawg - is everything ok with you? I saw another thread where you aid you were now disabled. I hope nothing is too serious.