It’s ok for the left to says there’s election fraud and unfair elections, but it’s “dangerous and could get someone killed” when others say it. pic.twitter.com/ix915JnNKj
— Hodgetwins (@hodgetwins) August 23, 2022
Artorias said:
As soon as you explain these...
They’re setting up the “stolen election” excuse for November. https://t.co/leNngqfrPK
— Bonchie (@bonchieredstate) August 24, 2022
What would you expect the curve to look like when a very heavily populated, urban, blue-leaning county reports its vote tabulation? Still a smooth curve? Almost a hundred blue stars on this post. Y'all need to go back to math class.Artorias said:
As soon as you explain these...
GeorgiAg said:
Quote:
On July 21, 2022, there was a hearing for Lake v Hobbs in Phoenix. A witness by the name of Clay Parikh was called for the plaintiff. Parikh is the lead information systems security officer for the ground missile defense system for Northrop Grumman. Prior to that, he worked for Lockheed Martin and Leidos through their merger as the deputy cyber manager for the Army Corps of Engineers.
But it's his prior work that is of particular relevance to this case: from 2008 to 2017, he worked as a security tester and a security subject matter expert for Wyle Laboratories and Pro V&V. Parikh claims to have tested hundreds of voting systems, including the Dominion and ES&S voting machines throughout his career as part of the certification process for the EAC and Secretaries of State. He holds a CISSP certification (Certified Information System Security Professional), as well as certification as an ethical hacker and a certified hacking forensics investigator.
Quote:
Parikh later went on to say that his "best time" hacking the ES&S machines was "two and a half minutes, but averaged five to ten minutes. It really didn't matter to the vendor." I wonder how that would stack up against the hackers that flock to Las Vegas for DEFCON each year for their shot at hacking these machines! As is often reported, the hackers are more often than not successful in (quickly) hacking these machines.
LinkQuote:
LaRue also got Parikh to confess that the testing laboratories he worked for would not let him run certain tests: "…the point I'm trying to get to is…the labs told me not to do certain tests. They will not allow me to do certain tests." Why would the testing labs try to restrict a certified tester from doing certain tests? You would think a testing lab paid by the state or local government would definitely want to ensure the machines were safe and secure no matter what testing was necessary! But that would imply that the state funds these testing labs. They don't. The voting machine vendors pay them. You read that correctly: the voting machine companies pay the testing companies to certify that the voting machine companies software is safe and secure.
And yet not a single damn GOP member is introducing bills for paper balloting only until legitimate concerns are resolved.aggiehawg said:
Bottom line, these electronic voting machines are complete crap, security wise. The accreditation companies are crap. The EAC is crap. It's all a shell game. The same people move around the chess board from one of the voting machine companies to the compliance company to EAC, CISA, and back. Checking their own "work" so to speak but in reality they don't even do that. At all. Ever.
Diebold was basically destroyed after 2004 and rightfully so. Problem was that they never really went away, just were repackaged under another name. And it was Obama/Holder Justice Department that largely created Dominion from a small Canadian company into the behemoth it is today.jagvocate said:And yet not a single damn GOP member is introducing bills for paper balloting only until legitimate concerns are resolved.aggiehawg said:
Bottom line, these electronic voting machines are complete crap, security wise. The accreditation companies are crap. The EAC is crap. It's all a shell game. The same people move around the chess board from one of the voting machine companies to the compliance company to EAC, CISA, and back. Checking their own "work" so to speak but in reality they don't even do that. At all. Ever.
jagvocate said:And yet not a single damn GOP member is introducing bills for paper balloting only until legitimate concerns are resolved.aggiehawg said:
Bottom line, these electronic voting machines are complete crap, security wise. The accreditation companies are crap. The EAC is crap. It's all a shell game. The same people move around the chess board from one of the voting machine companies to the compliance company to EAC, CISA, and back. Checking their own "work" so to speak but in reality they don't even do that. At all. Ever.
What a crock of s***. Did you read that? They already had evidentiary hearings in this case. I posted the expert's testimony including his cross examination which was a disaster for the defence. Dominion has admitted that their BMDs create QR codes that are scanned, that is unreadable to voters. So that piece of paper doesn't allow voters to see whether or not their votes were accurately recorded.GeorgiAg said:
The latest filing, a motion for Rule 11 Sanctions against Plaintiffs, will be interesting if granted. It is basically the Plaintiff's claim of election fraud are so baseless, they need to be sanctioned.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.azd.1294569/gov.uscourts.azd.1294569.97.0_2.pdf
I will type this very slowly for you and put it in caps:GeorgiAg said:
I haven't followed all the case. We'll see what the plaintiff's response is and how the court rules. Did they use QR codes in AR? I didn't see that mentioned but they mention the use of paper ballots. The brief also mentions that their system is not connected to the internet.
It’s ok for the left to says there’s election fraud and unfair elections, but it’s “dangerous and could get someone killed” when others say it. pic.twitter.com/ix915JnNKj
— Hodgetwins (@hodgetwins) August 23, 2022
You are equating 2016 to 2020?nortex97 said:It’s ok for the left to says there’s election fraud and unfair elections, but it’s “dangerous and could get someone killed” when others say it. pic.twitter.com/ix915JnNKj
— Hodgetwins (@hodgetwins) August 23, 2022
I don't see any of the 'there's no election fraud' types (and yes that of course includes georgiag) condemning all of this which claims Trump was fraudulently elected. Weird, you partisans sure are worried only about disproving/ignoring/excusing 2020 fraud, not 2016 stuff, or your team lining up to claim 2022 is going to be fraudulent (except in Pa and NC).
Russia did, and will continue to, interfere in our elections. What I was told, and what turned out to not be true, was that Russia had damning Kompromat on Trump and that there was specific quid pro quo agreements between Trump and Russia. Trump was giddy about Russia hacking Hillary's emails and him getting up on stage and saying the "Russia if you are listening..." comment was tacky and unamerican. I think that comment alone caused people to wonder about his ties to Russia.nortex97 said:It’s ok for the left to says there’s election fraud and unfair elections, but it’s “dangerous and could get someone killed” when others say it. pic.twitter.com/ix915JnNKj
— Hodgetwins (@hodgetwins) August 23, 2022
I don't see any of the 'there's no election fraud' types (and yes that of course includes georgiag) condemning all of this which claims Trump was fraudulently elected. Weird, you partisans sure are worried only about disproving/ignoring/excusing 2020 fraud, not 2016 stuff, or your team lining up to claim 2022 is going to be fraudulent (except in Pa and NC).