***Russian - Ukraine War Tactical and Strategic Updates*** [Warning on OP]

7,819,869 Views | 48313 Replies | Last: 11 hrs ago by JFABNRGR
Not a Bot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Not a Bot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

3 people killed, 11 wounded as result of missile strike in Perevalsk city of Luhansk region
https://liveuamap.com/en/2023/12-march-3-people-killed-11-wounded-as-result-of-missile

lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
lb3 said:

Last years Ukraine offensive was successful because HIMARS gave the Ukes longer range fires than the Russians. We had weeks of ammo depots blowing up and senior officers being killed until the Russians moved those assets further to the rear.

For the Ukes to be successful this spring they really need ATACMS in order to hit those repositioned supply bases.

Of course, that won't win the war but will make Russian logistics far more challenging. Ultimately the Ukes will probably need cruise missiles to win this battle of attrition. They need to be able to hit manufacturing facilities within Russia and key economic infrastructure.
Yep but that is a major escalation risk. Maybe the Ukes ought to use special forces to hit high value eco or logistic targets just inside Russia proper.
revvie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ttu_85 said:

lb3 said:

Last years Ukraine offensive was successful because HIMARS gave the Ukes longer range fires than the Russians. We had weeks of ammo depots blowing up and senior officers being killed until the Russians moved those assets further to the rear.

For the Ukes to be successful this spring they really need ATACMS in order to hit those repositioned supply bases.

Of course, that won't win the war but will make Russian logistics far more challenging. Ultimately the Ukes will probably need cruise missiles to win this battle of attrition. They need to be able to hit manufacturing facilities within Russia and key economic infrastructure.
Yep but that is a major escalation risk. Maybe the Ukes ought to use special forces to hit high value eco or logistic targets just inside Russia proper.

With ATACMS Ukraine would be able to hit all railway bridges across the Siviers Donets and Don Rivers supplying the Donbas region and the Kerch bridges that supply Crimea. They are able to attack ports of Mariupol and Berdyansk with existing armaments to some degree already.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
UPDATES
AGS-R-TUFF
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:


Awesome!
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It seems like Ukraine has been hitting Russian logistics in the Southeast. Air defense was active in Volnovakha and Mariupol, per LiveUAMap.



notex
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


FJB24
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://taskandpurpose.com/news/army-veteran-john-mcintyre-russian-propaganda/

Interesting use of an American (willingly) for propaganda.
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
insane video of russian trench being wiped out. INF support by IFV. I think the Bradleys and other IFV/AFVs are going to be plenty effective against russians including their MBTs.

https://funker530.com/video/nsfw-insane-footage-of-russian-trench-being-wiped-out/

Engine10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh sick we've got the plot for Hunt for Red October starting to play out

P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A lot better combined arms than the Russians. The IFV could not hit the Russians except when they were in the trench in-line with the machine gun. Uke gets out of the IFV and fires a RPG almost immediately knocking out a few Russians, tank main gun and machine gun knock out the rest.

I do think the volume of IFVs and tanks should help Ukraine push a counter offensive if implemented properly. Russia is fortifying positions in the south and east. They will have trenches built and minefields ready as well as artillery positions pre-sighted. Unlike with most American conflicts recently Ukraine should not focus on a zero loss outcome, they will take losses of both men and systems. How they implement both together will determine the outcome.
P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The USA never signed the UNCLOS that sets a country's boundaries 12 nautical miles from the coastline so being an unmanned aircraft I doubt we escalate more than some words being spoken. Especially with how weak out leadership is.

Or they want to make more money and do something stupid. My first thought is to find out where the SU27 was launched from and help Ukraine with a strike/operation on the base. Not a direct counter attack but also sends a message that knocking down an American aircraft will not go unpunished.
Not a Bot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ukraine isn't trying to win there. They are trying to get Russia to commit as many forces as possible there which necessarily weakens the front lines elsewhere, while not allowing a big breakthrough.

Ukraine seems to be willing to trade this area slowly for the opportunity to perhaps execute an attack in the south that is more strategically important.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

FJB24
How long do you want to ignore this user?
P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
To translate:

Northern Front: Bakhmut/Artemovsk

Effort Wagner units in the immediate vicinity of the administrative center of the city (Yevgeny Prigozhin)

Kiev is losing 10 to 11,000 soldiers per month in this sector of the front which has around 50,000 fighters (12 to 20,000 in the city)

If Ukraine tries to stick this out they are goners by the time summer is here, I get trying to weaken the Wagner and Russian elite units but Russia has millions or men they can conscript, Ukraine does not. Standing up to Russia never works, you need to pick when and where the battles are.
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Only on the internet can someone say they might be losing 10 to 10k soldiers a month and be taken seriously.
Touchless
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgLA06 said:

Only on the internet can someone say they might be losing 10 to 10k soldiers a month and be taken seriously.
I'd interpret that as 10,000 to 11,000. Not 10 to 11,000. Clearly it's more than 10 soldiers in a month.
FJB24
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Russian media outlet Verstka confirms Russian military enlistment offices starting new mobilisation campaign for war in Ukraine. Eligible men will be summoned to enlistment offices to "update personal data" and will be offered to go to Ukraine voluntarily
https://liveuamap.com/en/2023/14-march-russian-media-outlet-verstka-confirms-russian-military
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Waffledynamics said:

Quote:

Russian media outlet Verstka confirms Russian military enlistment offices starting new mobilisation campaign for war in Ukraine. Eligible men will be summoned to enlistment offices to "update personal data" and will be offered to go to Ukraine voluntarily
https://liveuamap.com/en/2023/14-march-russian-media-outlet-verstka-confirms-russian-military
LOL. Russian men falling for that?

Be easier to create a Tinder profile of an attractive Russian woman setting up dates.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


More museum pieces to the front
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The maxim machine gun is widely used/sought in this conflict. The M2 is enormously common/popular in US/western military service. I think we've sent them a bunch of M113's that were originally fielded around 1961.

Old is not always bad in military weaponry.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The goaltending is unbecoming. They were in storage for a reason
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Today's SITREP.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Longer one than usual today. Lots of information. Despite the front appearing stagnant, it is not inactive.

A few points:

  • Western analysts estimate ~200,000 dead or wounded for the Russian side
  • The offensive may have culminated in some places, such as in the Zaporizhzhia area.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Christ. They're real, lmao.

First Page Last Page
Page 1029 of 1381
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.