***Russian - Ukraine War Tactical and Strategic Updates*** [Warning on OP]

8,108,565 Views | 48827 Replies | Last: 7 hrs ago by ABATTBQ11
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guess Finland is on deck.

Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

Rossticus said:




I'll be astonished if we're delivering M777s because, for us, those are first line artillery in active duty units, not tubes sitting in reserve stocks. Still betting on it being the plentiful M198.


LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgLA06 said:

74OA said:

Rossticus said:




I'll be astonished if we're delivering M777s because, for us, those are first line artillery in active duty units, not tubes sitting in reserve stocks. Still betting on it being the plentiful M198.





Fox always has General Jack Keane on- as he was today. He is singularly uninformed and never mentions anything actually original or analytical. A viewer would be more educated following this thread than listening to 90% of the "experts" on the news.

he literally stated today that Ukraine only has artillery with less range than the Russian artillery which puts them at a disadvantage. and here we see M777s being provided which is probably the best tube in the world.
EMY92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
deddog said:

Rossticus said:


Know this is the Ukraine thread, but it absolutely always baffled me that the Royal Army has about 400 tanks.
The WWIII plan was for British tanks to quickly be moved across the channel to be used to counter attack any Soviet breakthroughs.

I think some were also sent to the gulf
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgLA06 said:

74OA said:

Rossticus said:




I'll be astonished if we're delivering M777s because, for us, those are first line artillery in active duty units, not tubes sitting in reserve stocks. Still betting on it being the plentiful M198.



Welp, there you go. Color me astonished.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

The WWIII plan was for British tanks to quickly be moved across the channel to be used to counter attack any Soviet breakthroughs.

I think some were also sent to the gulf
That makes sense to me. Could they be transported through the Chunnel?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is actually a bit of a change in course as I believe, at first announcement, M198s were specified. That's interesting. Hmm.
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good News Everyone! Now WE'RE Nazis AND genocidal!

Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How do the Russians actually believe that crap? There's no way they can. They have to just be lying when they say they buy it. Seriously?
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

Rossticus said:




Is that actually new? The last shot looks very similar to the wreck of an An-26 from the first few days of the war


Found it. Recycled footage from February

wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Never underestimate the stupidity and ignorance of the average human being
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well he is right...it is a proxy war now...but it would not have been anything if they had not tried to roll over a weaker neighbor.
You do not have a soul. You are a soul that has a body.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgBQ-00 said:

Well he is right...it is a proxy war now...but it would not have been anything if they had not tried to roll over a weaker neighbor.


I'd say that equating that to genocidal intent toward the Russian people is, to put it mildly, a stretch.

But like you said, Russia brought this on itself by invading a sovereign nation out of expansionist desire. Our current administration had given them a pass on Nordstream 2 for eff sake. We haven't exactly been all that aggressive toward them.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh I agree...I was just talking about the proxy way part. Also noting they fully brought it on themselves.
You do not have a soul. You are a soul that has a body.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
black_ice
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Speaking of Russian stupidity…

WesMaroon&White
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WesMaroon&White
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


This was a costly war for them.
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Waffledynamics said:

How do the Russians actually believe that crap? There's no way they can. They have to just be lying when they say they buy it. Seriously?
Russians be dumb. And genetically endowed with a paranoid gene, apparently.
twilly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A good numbers of these men still have their families in country with them. If they don't fight...
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Waffledynamics said:

How do the Russians actually believe that crap? There's no way they can. They have to just be lying when they say they buy it. Seriously?
Russians be dumb. And genetically endowed with a paranoid gene, apparently.


Example. Actual quote from a Russian expat in France I'm engaging with. Discussing how Putin can utilize Wagner and other extremist elements but claim Naziism as justification for invasion.

"I checked: Wagner is not a Nazi. And if Wagner had a relationship with VP, it's impossible because Putin wants to exterminate the Nazis. So not logical."

All points I've posed are passed through this filter. If Putin says something that is contradicted by facts and evidence then it's impossible for those facts and evidence to be legitimate. It's inherently illogical for anything to be factual if it violates Putin's assertions. She had the same "logic" for Bucha and Mariupol. Even videos and photos with no evidence of tampering are "clearly fake".

EDIT: Most recent reply on Wagner from Russian lady in France re: Wagner and Russia. And I swear I have no clue what propaganda joke she pulled this from. NATO generals said that Russia doesn't work with Wagner Group. Riiiiight…

"Well, even NATO generals have said so. If you don't believe NATO, who do you believe?
A few days ago I saw several articles: but the evidence has since disappeared from the net. I will try to find you the evidence that I had seen."
WesMaroon&White
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FamousAgg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It would be interesting to distribute the modern equivalent of a bunch of FP-45s all over eastern Ukraine. Give the men, women and children a way to defend themselves

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FP-45_Liberator
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
After doing some digging regarding the weapons storage captured by Russians in Balakleya, the following seems to be the case. Balakleya was taken by Russia days into the war. This isn't a capture of recent weapons deliveries. It also explains the carefully choreographed nature of it.

It's well produced propaganda in a secure area long held by Russians. This captured stash has no impact on hampering the current supply status of UAF and either

1) was off the board almost immediately.
2) is in large part Russian munitions portrayed as captured Ukrainian munitions.
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russian trolls getting ballsy over their (checks notes)…moral victory in Mariupol?



Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Predator. Love it.

MeatDr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
First Page Last Page
Page 527 of 1396
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.