Rossticus said:
aggiehawg said:
JFABNRGR said:
aggiehawg said:
Thanks. Really hard to follow and understand everything.
Part of info missing is likely that 2 rockets were fired. One failed or was taken out and the other impacted as targeted.
Then where are the parts of the warhead? Wouldn't there be some evidence? A crater? Other parts somewhere?
"SS-21 / Tochka-U's basic 9N123F conventional warhead is 120kg of high explosives and is designed for fragmentation [shrapnel]. But it can also carry 9N123 cluster munitions, which Russia has used repeatedly in the war, even against hospital facilities."
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/russia-ukraine-war-banned-cluster-munion-used-syria
After further review of additional footage, it seems this was certainly an airburst with fragmentation (damage/blood on 3 sides of the bldg). Fragmentation almost always means
Anti-personnel utilizing several hundred to thousands of small steel fragments. This would explain the limited damage to structure and no craters. With several hundred LB of explosives I still believe this rocket(s) did not fully work as capable, by the amount of intact glass and roof, either due to partial internal failure, intercept, etc.
I think the US mentioned this was a strategic target, but I strongly disagree. If you center the radius of damage the explosion occurred on the north end of the depot, where you buy tickets use the restroom etc where mostly passengers would be located, while missing the majority of industrial/commercial part of the yard and well beyond the blast radius of this weapon. There is zero evidence of any damage to track or trains and I am confident even the closet lines are completely operational. Coincidentally the remaining fuselage part of the rocket is about 300 feet from the center of the blast which also happens to be the expected damage radius of this warhead.
If I wanted to destroy the RR I would use HE explosive type warhead NOT fragmentation and I would target a bridge on the mainlines not yard track (several north and south of this location) or would have centered on the industrial/commercial part of the yard where transloading equipment is located
and knowing a train loaded with something that would cook off creating much more damage. I would have also used multiple rockets not a single, which what I now believe this was changing my previous thought.
This missile has a 95M CEP (circular error probability) and those *******s hit their target evidenced by the blood soaked teddy bear that was in some childs arms at the moment they died. **** russia.