GAC06 said:
The Debt said:
Quote:
Is this just throwing stuff on the wall time? You are seeing a war in real time, where Russia is unprepared. Please tell me an instance where human nature you throw in the "B" team.
As for DOD logistics, the Russian's couldn't hold our jock.
I guess it's not common knowledge, so let me explain it to you. During the cold war the west had intel on the quality of equipment in case things got hot. All the satellite states had 3rd and 4rh rate equipment, and tons of it. They saved their best equipment (tanks/jets) for Russia proper.
The idea behind this is that when nato invades, nato will send their best, just like you suggest. The best will grind through substandard equipment. They will put thousands of miles and hours on the shiny new equipment, causing erosion and maintenance, and by the time the allies get to Russia, the Soviets unleash fresh equipment that was tactically comparable, but with less wear.
I was not surprised when we saw 30year old tanks and trucks with half a tank of gas being thrown at Ukraine. Its consistent with their m.o.
Plus you have to remember Russians play chess from age 5. Do you lead with a rook, or with a pawn? Pawns, in this war, probe enemy positions, flush them out, Ukrainians throw the kitchen sink at the pawns, then a queen shows up and they are all fked.
Except they are using their newest stuff, and their elite units.
Where did I say the queen wasnt on the board?
You are presuming the Russian losses are the best stuff and I just refuted the idea that they led with their best.
I would warn you guys, dont believe anything you hear on TV or see on twitter. This thread is filled with "omg news about javelins and trucks" at least half of it has been manufactured to make ukraine look competent and Russia incompetent.
You are seeing it for public consumption for the sake of a narrative, a narrative someone is pushing.