GAC06 said:ABATTBQ11 said:GAC06 said:
MLRS, HIMARS, SDB, etc. Sending a B-2 from the US to attack tactical mobile targets in Europe isn't what they do
Not mobile when they're stuck in their own traffic and will get stuck once you care the world's biggest potholes. You also want to destroy the road since it seems like they're having trouble in the mud. And good luck getting an MLRS or HIMARS anywhere close enough anytime before April.
Sure it isn't what they do, but if you need to get in and get out with absolute minimal risk of being hit or seen, it's the platform for the job because that is pretty much the only mission parameter that matters right now.
I was talking about our response to an invasion of Poland. Even if we're talking attacking Russia in Ukraine tomorrow that's not a good weapon to target match. There's other stuff the B-2 is more suited for, and lots of other systems better suited for attacking a convoy.
Then you commented out of line. What you commented on was strictly in response to hitting the currently stuck convoy with BRRRRRTTTTT that would likely be lit up by the convoy's air defenses. Then again, the Russians have proven somewhat inept at following their own doctrine and don't seem to have any kind of layered air defenses.
Either way, at the current juncture, yes, there are better weapon to target matches, but no, you would not want any of them in theater lest you give away the fact you just bombed a Russian convoy. It's not about the best weapon to target match, it's about the best weapon to mission match, which places not being seen above all else.