***Russian - Ukraine War Tactical and Strategic Updates*** [Warning on OP]

7,829,476 Views | 48352 Replies | Last: 9 min ago by lb3
black_ice
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SPSAg05 said:



Go time?



LOL !!!!! WAT? Go time because of a reporter getting fraggged???? LOL
bonfarr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
angus55 said:

Eliminatus said:

As awful as it sounds, I still doubt it. Embedded journalists have always been a weird gray area in these kinds of things.

Definitely a step in that direction though.

Also, **** Putin.


Have we been ramping up any forces to Europe if they strike? I have heard of smaller movements, but if they strike are we going to throw in a smaller force? If we are forced go it needs to be with overwhelming force. Kick them out of Ukraine and then ensure Putin understands Ukraine is defended going forward.


I would imagine any initial NATO strike would be missiles and aircraft strikes. I don't see NATO sending in the small number of ground troops that are staged nearby before they were reinforced with much bigger numbers from elsewhere in Europe.
Disclaimer: Views expressed in this post reflect the opinions of Texags user bonfarr and are not to be accepted as facts or to be accepted at face value.
OKC~Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nato won't considered "attacked" unless such an attack occurred in Nato soil...

Nato supply getting attacked in Ukraine is not considered Nato...
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PJYoung said:


The other side of that coin is that the absence of US special forces may have emboldened Putin.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Decay said:

MeatDr said:

Some possible confirmation NATO will retaliate if convoys are attacked.



This strikes me as very odd. We seem to be capitulating at every turn but we're supposed to believe NATO will defend vehicles and supplies they've taken into a war zone?

This is a very different stance if so.


Long overdue if you ask me. Hopefully they follow through.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
McInnis 03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OKC~Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hope this is true...but won't bet on it
Ag In Ok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Don't trust the name.
Dorm 15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
G Martin 87 said:

PJYoung said:


The other side of that coin is that the absence of US special forces may have emboldened Putin.
"More" ?
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We've been training the Ukrainians for years
Dorm 15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That I knew. I was just commenting on the confirmation that we have SOF there now.
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dorm 15 said:

That I knew. I was just commenting on the confirmation that we have SOF there now.


That's not a confirmation of that, it's a denial
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That was some precise shooting. Has there been a change in airborne assets command and control directing to precise targets?
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Decay said:

MeatDr said:

Some possible confirmation NATO will retaliate if convoys are attacked.



This strikes me as very odd. We seem to be capitulating at every turn but we're supposed to believe NATO will defend vehicles and supplies they've taken into a war zone?

This is a very different stance if so.
NATO transports supplies to the Polish border with Ukraine.

Ukraine then transports the supplies across the border and into the war zone.

Ukrainian convoys inside Ukraine have always been at risk of attack.

NATO is saying any strike against its convoys in NATO territory will be treated as an attack on NATO.
SPSAg05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Leadership.
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
may not have been many air defense assets in the area.

Russia caught them by surprise
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
W said:

may not have been many air defense assets in the area.

Russia caught them by surprise
In a training facility?
ATX_AG_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
it's a surprise.

a Russian attack that actually worked like it was supposed to.

maybe the fact that is was so far in the western part of the country helped
ATX_AG_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
are the Russians finally getting their act together?

sounds like some military leaders have been replaced...and the new guys are making adjustments
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maybe? Blowing up buildings full of people hasn't been their problem to this point. Actually disabling strategic assets has been.
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teddy Perkins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Attempts to silence Melitopol.

Spaceship, I hope your BIL is doing ok.

chris1515
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
W said:

are the Russians finally getting their act together?

sounds like some military leaders have been replaced...and the new guys are making adjustments


Could be that Russia is just sharing more info and sharing some of their successes.
DapperDanMan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Damn right he's a leader!
Slava Ukraini!
Yukon Cornelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pretty obvious the training facility was being used to stage foreign fighters and foreign supplies. Can't be surprised it was attacked. Russia has been saying for days now they would attack.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SPSAg05 said:



Leadership.


The man is pure inspiration.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATX_AG_08 said:




That would be a real disaster
neAGle96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
angus55 said:

Eliminatus said:

As awful as it sounds, I still doubt it. Embedded journalists have always been a weird gray area in these kinds of things.

Definitely a step in that direction though.

Also, **** Putin.


Have we been ramping up any forces to Europe if they strike? I have heard of smaller movements, but if they strike are we going to throw in a smaller force? If we are forced go it needs to be with overwhelming force. Kick them out of Ukraine and then ensure Putin understands Ukraine is defended going forward.


We don't want to provoke Putin.

Seriously, one of the associates in the secretary of states office was asked that question on sky news and she mentioned sanctions, but "we don't want to take any action that will be perceived as a provocation "
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I found an interesting map website. Not sure if it's been posted before.

https://liveuamap.com/
Build It
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The only way this ends faster is for more Russians to die much more quickly.


We aren't giving them aircraft, what defensive weapons do they not have that will increase the body count?
First Page Last Page
Page 315 of 1382
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.